Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pure and simple: Do you support the Senate's financial rescue bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:10 AM
Original message
Poll question: Pure and simple: Do you support the Senate's financial rescue bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rolleitreks Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh Boy, kicking butt with that first yes!
I don't care if a few fat cats stay fat, if it keeps the rest of us from getting too skinny. Schadenfreude has its limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. No regulation, more tax cuts, bullshit.
Although they almost got me with raising the FDIC limit to 250000.

Pass a Democratic bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Extending the abomination of the Cheney/Bush tax cuts? No FUCKING way!
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 11:19 AM by TahitiNut
:grr: :grr:

Some poison pills are too toxic even for the best plans ... and the fundamental theory of this 'bailout' (buying up toxic MBS) is flawed and misguided.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Very little with this mess is pure and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely not.
I love how the Republicans were portrayed by many in the media as standing firm with the American public against the original bill...when all they were apparently holding out for was a few more tax cuts for their corporate masters.

This bailout is criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ww2player Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. That money won't solve OUR Problems
It is going to be used to buy bad loans from other countries that made bad mortgage deals in foriegn countries. When they change the wording to spend the money ONLY on buying up bad loans made in THIS country on property in THIS country.. then it would be alot more sane. Alot of people need to be going to prison when all this is done and over with. Including some politicians who took bribes - I mean "campaign contributions" from the crooks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Uh, Katie, I'd like to use a lifeline?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidan Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. (edit - supposed to be a reply to the OP)
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 11:41 AM by Poseidan
If there is no better way, then I would vote yes. I personally do not know enough about the economy to comment exhaustively, but certainly, the government portion should not be so open to crime. Republican fascists have adopted the worst qualities of both liberalism and conservatism.

I still like the idea of the government itself providing credit (tax-payers lending to other tax-payers). Rich people don't care about anyone but themselves, and anything but their profit margins. If we can solve the problem without going through them, we should.

I do have some concern congress was bought many years ago by corporations, who are happy to buy and sell people like products, or slaves, and would be happiest purchasing an entire government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not sure... Barney Frank is for it... but he was supporting it with the
whole 'can't prosecute for unconstitutional actions' thing still in it... I'm very, very unsure now.

And extremely disgusted with all of them (except Kucinich and that guy in Oregon)... because they have seen this mess coming for years, and either didn't do any research into the different ways other countries addressed the problem -- in order to learn from their mistakes -- or are just completely bankrupt of any real desire to serve the people (the non-rich people, anyway).

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Damn the DLC bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hell no.
It's an abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tismyself Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. I can not get beyond
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. I would if it bailed me out. My "house is on fire" too. n/t
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 11:54 AM by Dr Fate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. It is the WRONG MOVE
the wrong bill.

call a moratorium on foreclosures. take over the failing banks and audit ALL of them. those that are insolvent must be allowed to fail.

put liquidity into the market via solvent financial institutions and, as much as possible, at state and local levels - allow the SBA to extend loans to get through this crisis at this local level.

both the House and Senate moves are the wrong moves. they show a total lack of acceptance of reality by republicans - opposition isn't just based upon "no bailout."

Business as usual, as has been practiced over the last three decades is OVER. It is over because it has fallen due to the corruption it fosters that is part of its foundation. The era of Reaganomics has ended and politicians who do not "get" this are a danger to the American people. honestly.

I do not think that Bush will agree to any of this, obviously.

In so many ways, I find it's useless to talk about any of this because the powers-that-be are so corrupt in this nation they cannot and will not make a good decision for the health and well-being of this nation. Republicans continue to refuse to see the failure of their ideology and the harm it has done and will continue to do to this nation.

I feel like I'm watching the train wreck that so many saw coming...and no one in a position to do so was willing to switch tracks.

We are seeing the total collapse of republican ideology. THEIR POLICIES have done long, long term damage to the U.S. and have led to this moment in which the U.S. has lost its position as the world power. No matter what is done, this is the truth. This is the consequence of their policies. Cause and effect.

I find it astonishing that they continue to refuse to accept the reality that they are the problem, but that is why nothing will stop this train wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC