Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if this "giveaway " passes ...what are the odds of a presidential signing statement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:37 PM
Original message
So if this "giveaway " passes ...what are the odds of a presidential signing statement
eliminating everything not in the original bill he proposed and all the "unfunded" mandates also being wiped out with a stroke of the kings pen?

This is too important for "trust" at this point... he should be asked up front
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's a given
and even if they 'promise' they won't, I'd still say it's a given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended - a really good question...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. The last statement in the bill needs to be:
"By signing this bill, the President acknowledges and accepts that any rights, whether real, perceived, or otherwise, to modify this bill in any manner by use of a signing statement will nullify and void this bill."

That should take care of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Should add a clause to the bill then...
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 01:43 PM by calipendence
Any effort to alter this agreement through signing statements or not following it's language in executing the tenets of this bill as laid out, would be viewed as grounds for IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT and REMOVAL FROM OFFICE!

Perhaps find making impeachment even part of the bill, so that if it's changed, then in effect, Bush would be impeached THEN, when he issued the signing statement, since a vote would already be cast in the house on it. Not sure if that could be done, but might make * think twice abou f'ing with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Viewed as"? How about "trigger automatic"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yea, that was kind of what the second part of my post said...
If they could make that stick as "automatic", then I say go for it. Not sure if Republicans would help pass it, or if "impeachment off the table" Pelosi would stand in the way of this language being added, but perhaps if there's enough pressure on them to pass it if it is the right thing to do, they'll do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. The beauty of signing statements is that even if there is a specific passage barring them, their
very nature gives them veto power over the bill itself. They cannot be prevented.

That is what a unitary presidency is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That is my fear
He can chop it up/slice it dice it and we can do nothing about it


I wish the congress could let us know about any signing statement attached to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. That may be the number one reason to wait until Obama is in office to deal with this.
Congress is arguing over wording of the bill...and the whole thing may be totally pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. 100%
Let's call it Carlysle's $700,000,000,000 parting gift. Now we have to make sure the we truly get rid of these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC