Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Gov. Don Siegelman and HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy lawyers file final appeal briefs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:59 PM
Original message
Former Gov. Don Siegelman and HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy lawyers file final appeal briefs
Former Gov. Don Siegelman and HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy lawyers file final appeal briefs
Final appeals in for convictions in corruption case
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
KIM CHANDLER
News staff writer


MONTGOMERY - Former Gov. Don Siegelman and HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy filed their final briefs Monday with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals asking the court overturn their convictions in a government corruption case.

Defense lawyers wrote that prosecutors confused legal campaign contributions with illegal bribes and that the trial judge did not fully investigate allegations of juror misconduct.

The appellate court is expected to hear oral arguments in the case in December.

A federal jury in 2006 convicted Scrushy and Siegelman of federal funds bribery, conspiracy and mail fraud. Prosecutors alleged Scrushy bought a seat on the state Certificate of Need Review Board with $500,000 in donations to Siegelman's 1999 lottery campaign.

Siegelman also was convicted on a separate obstruction of justice charge on allegations he tried to hide money he got from a lobbyist by claiming it was an aide's down payment for his motorcycle.

Defense lawyers wrote Monday that federal prosecutors did not meet the legal standard established by the Supreme Court that differentiates an illegal bribe from a legal campaign contribution. In a 1991 case involving a West Virginia politician, the Supreme Court ruled campaign contributions could be prosecuted as bribes only when the politician makes an "explicit promise" to sell some official action in exchange for the contribution.

"Prosecutors must prove that the official promised, pledged to undertook to take some official action in exchange for the contribution," Siegelman's defense lawyers wrote.

more...

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/metro.ssf?/base/news/122276251162120.xml&coll=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC