lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:34 PM
Original message |
Just a guess, but will they call off the debate in protest of moderator Gwen Iffil? |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 07:36 PM by lonestarnot
Just because their assholes and can't google the tubes or read the papers, shit I thought she read "all of 'em."
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No! The rethugs are imbeciles; Olbermann nailed them. nt |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. As Olbermann says, they are MORONS! |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. And that is exactly why they could use this excuse! |
angstlessk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. no, but they will blame evey gaff and all the problems of Palin on Ifill |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No. Whining is expected and it won't be called off. |
Tallison
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Her publication has been on record for months |
|
and the Pub side agreed to her moderation in full cognizance of it months ago. If they try, it'll be because the Palin variable turned wild, not Gwen, and I don't know that they can 'legally' do that.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. Good because my beer is in the fridgie chill'n. |
|
:evilgrin: and it ain't no piss water coors or buttcheek bud! :D
|
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
7. they won't call off the debate - just suspend the campaign for 90 minutes. |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Ha! They need more than 90 minutes. nt |
npk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They will have bigger things to worry about. Like what the hell was Palin talking about.
|
Blaze Diem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
9. No but they ARE getting their talking points ready when Palin bombs. |
|
I was Iffel's fault. Iffel favored Biden..(won't be cuz their VP candidate is a blithering heap of bullshit)
Already setting it up to cover Palin's idiocy. -------------
The answer to this, however, is the fact that Gwen Iffel is a woman, like Palin. You'd think they'd be happy with this arrangment.
GOP whiners.
|
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
12. They are putting Ifill in th eposition of having to bend over backwards to NOTappear biased toward |
|
Obama. This may be enough for them.
|
verges
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they decide the death blow of a no-show would be less painful than Sarah actually showing up and finishing them off that way. It would really be like conceding the election now if she doesn't show Her showing up gives them a slower perhaps more painful (for them) death. It show's some defree of fight!
|
A Brand New World
(803 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Just substitute Katie Couric. She seems to be handling Palin |
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
15. That would be interesting. n/t |
jimshoes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I'm going with an emergency appendectomy |
|
Very sudden like. Will be laid up for 2 or 3 days.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |