Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hustler Produces Palin-Lookalike Porn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:47 AM
Original message
Hustler Produces Palin-Lookalike Porn
Larry Flynt is using the power of porn to express his views on Sarah Palin.

The Hustler founder and freedom of speech advocate has produced an X-rated movie using an adult-film actress who resembles the Republican vice presidential candidate.

Flynt's producers posted an anonymous help-wanted ad on Craigslist in L.A. just days after the Republican convention. "Looking for a Sarah Palin look-alike," read the ad, "for an adult film to be shot in the next 10 days." The actress would be paid $3,000 for the part, said the ad.

Flynt's spokesman David Carrillo confirmed to us yesterday that the film has been shot by Hustler Video, but he wouldn't yet reveal the title.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/02/hustler-produces-palin-lo_n_131127.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Icky. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. $3,000? That's it? Why are they so cheap? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think porn is a lot like professional wrestling, appropriately enough.
I think top tier people probably get paid a lot and the rest get paid shit. I wouldn't dream to know how you gauge the top talent in porn but they actually have an awards show every year lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They aren't going to pay more than they have to.
No business is ever going to pay more than they have to.

Obviously $3k was enough to do the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. They also get points up front. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. points up front? What does that amount to? I don't understand
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 11:08 AM by Ilsa
how these things work in indie (or whatever) films.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I believe "points up front" means a percentage of the take from Gross sales (not net profit)
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 11:13 AM by slampoet

However I think the post was trying to turn "points up front" into a sexual joke.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Standard porn per diem was $1000 per day in 1997. So $3000 for a one day shoot sounds about right...
....considering the actress will get paid a little more because this is a "Special Fetish" role (like Midgets, Double Anal, or Scat)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I highly doubt porn producers are generous enough to give their actors "points" though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. For one day's worth of work? That's on the higher end of things.
Without getting into its long-term effects, porn is pretty good short-term money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. It's a hoax. I'll believe it only when the casting call goes out for both a "Sarah" and a "Bristol"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't reveal the title
I've got a good title for it, "Drill Here,Drill Now!!"

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bukowskiforever Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
72. Don't you mean: "Drill, baby, Drill!?" Yeah, that's right
Drill harder, drill deeper. Yeah baby, go offshore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. As far as you know, I did not almost fall out of my chair laughing at that.
I'm much too high-minded for that sort of humor. I'm always, 100% of the time, above this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. this isn't funny.
Really. WTF is the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think the whole idea is pretty stupid, but I bet more Republicans
buy the flick. They were the ones getting hot and using that term "MILF".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Either way, it's sad and pathetic.
Not only do we have a female politician being reduced to nothing more than a sexual fantasy for assholes, but now I have to defend Palin because of it and this really pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Agreed. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. As an asshole myself, I can assure you I have NEVER had a sexual fantasy about Sarah Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Hahahaha - you need not defend anything, especially THAT!
If you hate porn so very much, rail on Larry Flynt like all the other "I'm more feminist than you are and what I say goes!" types.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
95. I don't hate porn. I hate doing this to female politicians.
Can you honestly not see the problem with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. I hear you. I really don't want to feel any sympathy towards her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. You don't need to defend Palin because of it.
Did you defend Bill Clinton when Flynt used a Bill Clinton look alike in porn?

Lets face it. Sarah Palin lookalike porn is morally superior to Sarah Palin. Or Sarah Palin supporters, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. McCain and his ilk are the ones that have been pushing her looks and "charm"
They've brought out the most under qualified, out of her league candidate that they possibly could have found. They have pushed this "charming", "attractive", "hot", "MILF" and other terms describing her looks for weeks now. It's about all I've heard from the GOP sheep that I work with when it comes to her.

They love the sexual fantasy of her for some reason. Let Flynt make the flick and take the GOP's money as fast as he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Pff.
The whole purpose of Sarah Palin is to trick stupid women into voting Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Now there's the Larry we know and love
Porn should always be done as parody. Do they still make the cheesy movie and TV rip offs? "Star Whores", "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Poon", "Miami Spice" (real title BTW. Has an impressive underwater blowjob scene.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I prefer the classic story - ala "How Moist was my Valley?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Old school, I feel that.
I'd still do Nina Hartley or Marilyn Chambers and they're both pushing 80. Ok, I go now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. Ewww...
You obviously haven't seen Marilyn Chambers lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
17. Nice! Go Larry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. Title: "Sarah Spreads Her Democracy"
And it's opening nationwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. Drill Here, Drill Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. The Bush Doctrine----
She learns it, finally......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
54. "The Butt Plug to Nowhere"
Staring Joe "Dildo" Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juan_de_la_Dem Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
68. DP V.P.
I am a little embarrassed to post this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
92. The Old Man and the General Erection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm sure lots of republican men will be secretly buying it.
Larry will make lots of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. What happened to the names of hypocritical politicians he said he would release?
Anytime now, Larry...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. Larry decided to cut right to the chase. The working title is "Moose Fucker".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. And we cheer this because we think he's on our side.
Makes me want to puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I don't think Larry is on our side
I think Larry is and always has been on Larry's side. I don't neccissarily think of him as a friend to Democrats, but he's certainly an enemy to Republicans so I don't mind him being a thorn in their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. While that may be true, it makes me ill to see peeps on this board applauding
the total and wanton objectification of women for financial gain. HIS financial gain. I don't care what a person says, supporting ANYTHING LF does is tantamount to supporting the oppression of women. He's a thorn in the ass of women even more so than the rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I'm not going to turn this thread into a porn war thing
suffice to say I disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. If you don't like porn, DON'T WATCH IT
That's how it works, rather than trying to take other's rights away

If you feel oppressed and objectified by it, don't watch it.

I feel oppressed and objectified by Sex in the City. And you know what, I don't watch it.

Flynt, love him or hate him, is why you can watch shows on HBO with nudity. He is why you can satirize a politician any way you see fit.

Yes he made money. I'm glad. His stuff is one method of celebrating sexuality. If you are threatened by sex, don't watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Bravo and Well Said
I find it very odd that people like this and ultra-fundamentalists are on the same page. It's not as if women are being forced to do porn - they choose to do so and from all accounts, many enjoy the work. Who can argue with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. You think so?
I alway find it very odd that porn apologists never give a shit about the real life of sex workers. Just close their eyes and pretend what they want to be true is true. Kind of like religious fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. What are you talking about?
I'm talking about Porn stars - not sex workers in the sense of prostitutes, etc.

There's a whole industry devoted to promoting the stars and the stars make a good amount of money. You think someone is holding a gun to these peoples heads and forcing them to join up? Adults should be able to make decisions on what they want to do with their lives.

I'm not saying that there aren't some instances in porn where people get hoodwinked (no pun intended) or taken advantage of, but to dismiss it outright is - well, contrary to the basic tenants of our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. And add to it the majority of porn is not done by pro's
Amateur Porn skyrocketed in the 90's, and hasn't gone down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. Yes, that's a very important point
There are entire communities on the internet (I wont give them out - do some research if you want them) devoted to amateur pornography. Men and woman, just like us, who enjoy taking photos and posting them on the internet or within their e-community. It's a big business for the site owners and the women by in large are just as active in it as the men.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Yup
Personally, that's my 'flavor' of porn - being I like seeing nekkid housewives - and with digital cameras you no longer have to speculate over a blurry Polaroid reprint to see what she looks like.

But to each his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. You know what they say about great minds?
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 02:28 PM by TornadoTN
Great minds think alike. That's my porn preference.

"Hollywood" Porn is just too overdone and the women look either perfect or overdone.

My wife and I (yes my wife!) prefer looking at amateurs/homemade stuff on the occasions that we do look. I don't think we are degrading women in any respect, more appreciating differences and beauty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. Exactly - for me the human body is art
Organic Art

It drives my wife crazy that I don't have a "type" either. She tries to guess my type and I'll come along with appreciation for a totally different body type.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
76. So you think
Every porn worker is a star? No, I know you don't. Trust me on this one, it's not an easy life for some and there are those who don't have much of choice for one reason or another. Understand as well, I think on a global level, not just the good old US. There are pro-sex worker advocates who fight for the health and safety of sex workers every day. Yes, there is a need for this fight beyond any first amendment arguments.

It's the height of hypocrisy to assume it's all about "good" money or simple self promotion and empowerment. Some of those workers get in dire straights.

It's not porn I object to, although I find it misogynist, as much as the industry itself which makes wall street look like a day care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. The industry itself???
You would be surprised how low tech it is.

No not every porn worker is a star. IN fact, the majority of them are amateurs - regular people who like to pose and show themselves. You know 'Misogynist Women who enjoy being oppressed' :eyes:

You know what I find Misogynist? People telling women what they can and can't do with their body. Telling them that their choice of profession is misogynist just because they don't like it.

Like I said earlier, there are no anti-porn feminists. Its about as oxymoronic as Feminists for Life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #76
99. How is it different from factory work for men? Let's try a little experiment
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 05:29 PM by GliderGuider
I'll take your post, but change the words "porn" or "sex" to "factory". Lets see how it reads...
(So you think) Every factory worker is a star? No, I know you don't. Trust me on this one, it's not an easy life for some and there are those who don't have much of choice for one reason or another. Understand as well, I think on a global level, not just the good old US. There are pro-factory worker advocates who fight for the health and safety of factory workers every day. Yes, there is a need for this fight beyond any first amendment arguments.

It's the height of hypocrisy to assume it's all about "good" money or simple self promotion and empowerment. Some of those workers get in dire straights.

It's not factory work I object to, although I find it (misanthropic), as much as the industry itself which makes wall street look like a day care.

Hmmm...

The point is there's just as much alienation, mistreatment and lack of choice in any assembly line work, whether you sell your hands or your sex organs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. And FYI - the life of a prostitute varies from CSW to CSW
Some make $10,000 a night like the Jersey Lolita that went out with Spitzer Swallows

Some make $20 at a time

But most fall somewhere in the middle

The internet has all but destroyed the 'pimp' to the point where he's only a caricature used in Hip Hop Videos. Now days the CSW will hire a 'bouncer' only to step in if she is harassed or unpaid. He usually just charges a percentage of the reclaimed $$$.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #64
79. Huh.
I always find it really odd that the anti-porn pearl-clutchers secretly masturbate to the really, really nasty shit. At least those who haven't got some sort of biological dysfunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #79
84. Hi Bo!
And here you are, keyboard in hand, so to speak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Hiya.
Did you enjoy that Man on Chicken link you requested?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #79
87. LOL
Very true

The more you repress your desires, the weirder they come out (and they will come out)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
61. How about the objectification of men?
Those shots of athletic male posteriors aren't there to please male viewers, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
67. Presumably the person who took the job was over 18 and mentally competent.
She had the final say in whether she was objectified, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. No - we need others to consent for them...
:sarcasm:

There is no such thing as an anti-porn feminist. You are either for women choosing to do what they want with their bodies, or you are NOT a feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Wrong
Wrong and a very silly and ignorant thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #71
86. Agreed.
Being against porn and for feminism is like when Sarah Palin calls herself a feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
78. I agree with you.
I agree with you...

I make no apologies about it. And I don't watch porn. And I think it's degrading to the human spirit-- all of it. I think it reduces even more what our true potentials would otherwise allow.

And for those who think we should keep my opinions to ourselves because it's different than yours, (which is counter intuitive given the very nature of this forum), "kiss my skinny, fish-belly-white, pimpled butt".

(Notice I didn't tell anyone they couldn't watch it... notice no one has said that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. I respect that - but arguing against porn is tantamount to wanting it eradicated
I don't see a middle ground on this one but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've been known to eat crow before, I suspect I'll do it again at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #81
93. With specificity, please tell me how I am...
With specificity, please tell me how I am either directly or indirect, advocating for a ban of porn by stating I believe it degrades the human condition and objectifies the individual?

A valid answer to that question would have me eating crow. Are we to keep our mouths shut on all things that we believe reduce our humanity whilst still legal and within the parameters of contemporary social mores? If that is indeed the case, then most of us would have stay silent 90% of the time I'd guess.

May we take your statement, "arguing against porn is tantamount to wanting it eradicated" and replace 'porn' with 'republican' for the sake of argument. Do we want a ban on people making the personal choice to be a Republican (a serious, albeit rhetorical question)? Don't we, almost to a person argue against both the republican ideals and republicans as individuals on DU? Does your statement then mean we want a legal ban preventing anyone from making that choice?

This is not intended as snark-- but I'm having a seriously bad afternoon. Take me with sincerity, as that is how it meant regardless of how it comes across.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. Got news for you: Your job, your clothes, and your bank accounts all objectify you
We are an object related society, so naturally objectification will always happen.

Ever hear the term "prostitution of labor"?

So why is objectification in sexual way bad
But objectification in a monetary sense good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #96
100. I'm afraid I don't see how the shirt I'm wearing objectifies me.
I'm afraid I don't see how the shirt I'm wearing objectifies me. As far as I know, it's merely protecting me from this morning's early drizzle. Possibly you think I'm wearing it for a different reason. I happen to believe that intent (or means to and end) is just as important as the goal (or the end reached).

Yet as this is all perception, each one no less nor nor more valid than any other (all things being equal), then your opinion that I'm objectified and degraded by my shirt is neither greater nor less than my opinion that pornography is degrading


But allow me to re-qualify my statement if we take your statement as valid. It would then follow that objectification, like any human construct may be either positive or negative. I imagined that even in the worst case scenario, that would have been implicit in my position-- but I guess not. Thus, I imagine some people would be forced to state that, although pornography objectified the individual, it must objectify the individual in a positive way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Life, get a cherokeeprogressive
Woohoo! Pornwars revisited!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Well he's on MY side. Not sure if he's on yours.
You see I happen to be pretty obsessive about that First Ammendment thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. I wonder if the male lead will be played by a moose?
Bullwinkle Boinks Barbie comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. lulz
Rule #34.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. i wont be seeing that because i dont want to lose all desire for women
or porn for that matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Well yeah - If I'm up for political fantasies, they will always involve Monica Lewinski
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. i think pelosi and hillary are FAR more attractive than palin
i cant find people i disrespect attractive. my brain wont allow it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Hillary was a cutie until she cut her hair short
After that, it was all over :cry:

But honestly, she's kept her looks as well as anyone who didn't get sleep for 1 1/2 years could...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadinMo Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. Gag. But don't you know there will some good ole boys
who enjoy that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Are you saying the OP is "sexist bullshit"
?

Kill the messenger I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. What's the matter with sexy bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. Can I pretend that it's Tina Fey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. I can "handle" that
I love me some Tina Fey (and Amy Poehler).

Tina Fey AND Amy Poehler.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. That's a sandwich
I'd thankfully be the meat in.

Whooo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. Hefner wants her in playboy
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 12:38 PM by ismnotwasm
Sans glasses.

Suppose I should clarify, the 'real' Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
63. She agreed,but only if there is no interview.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Oooh Bad!!
Clever though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. Love ya Larry; but the primary purpose of porn IMHO is to arouse & facilitate masturbation...
...this concept fails on both fronts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Ah, but a lesser purpose is satire.
Like Falwell and his mom in his outhouse.

He's killing three birds with one stone. Making money with assorted rednecks who actually purchase this porn. Making liberals laugh. And causing outrage among all sorts of snivelling pissants, which I say justifies the means in and of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Oh, I'm certainly not outraged. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
60. One thing's for sure...
it won't just be Putin rearing his head and coming into Palin's space...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
74. this post is worthless without pictures. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Already seen it
or something like it
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
88. THANKS, BUT NO THANKS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. LOL! You said it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
94. One for masochists, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
97. 3,000 buck is it??? What a fucking fatassed pigface bigot sexist ugly POS
I've wasted enough breath on that fuckwad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
98. Bwahaha! Brilliant way to express social criticism of the American sheeple, if you ask me.
No one has mentioned it on this thread, but I would like
to suggest the possibility that the motivation behind this
endeavor is NOT to make a porn film, but a scathing critique
of the popular culture that has produced a nation of morons
and hypocrites.

The very same x-tian cretins who claim Palin is
a woman of Gawd are the very same people
slipping in the alley door of their local porn shops.

I think it is brilliant of Flynt.
The ultimate "calling out" of the most
hypocritical people among our citizenry.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC