mirror wall
(282 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:10 AM
Original message |
Is increasing a sales tax always regressive? |
|
I'm absentee voting right now and am a bit confused on a proposed amendment. The funds would go toward preserving wildlife, but the sales tax would be increase. I've always felt that sales taxes were unfair and that if you want to fund something, do it by raising income taxes on the wealthy.
What do you think?
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:16 AM
Original message |
They should have a wildlife tax on snowmobiles, ATV's and chainsaws |
|
Let the destroyers of wildlife and wildlife habitat pay the price.
|
progdonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I believe so, even if the proposed target is noble... |
|
Who's taxed and where the taxes go are two different questions. The first question determines whether it's pro-/regressive and the second just determines whether it's a worthwhile tax.
With the amendment, it's basically making the people at the lower end of the economic ladder pay for the preservation of wildlife. (That's better than having them pay for new B-2 bombers to kill other poor people at least.)
Sounds like the people behind it are basically saying, "You want to protect the forests? Fine, YOU pay for it; now, excuse me while I go fish on my yacht."
|
nebenaube
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The problem is that we already paid to preserve the wild-life and build schools and... |
|
cover health care, the puppet government decided to blow it all on war instead.
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Sales taxes can be made less unfair |
|
an across-the-board flat tax on all purchases does tend to bite the poor worse than it does the rich, in that it takes a larger percent of their income
some places don't levy them on food and medicine; some have increased "luxury" taxes on some items deemed non-essential like jewelry and pleasure boats
one good thing about a luxury tax - it is harder to duck than is an income tax. Wealthy people can use loopholes to avoid paying taxes on millions in income, but if they buy that yacht, or 30,000 square foot house, or fifty carat diamond, the transaction is (usually) visible and there is no complex tax code to allow them to offset it.
|
Somawas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-07-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes. Sales taxes are always regressive. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |