Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want a rethug to look me straight in the eye, and tell me who should bear the burden of taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:23 PM
Original message
I want a rethug to look me straight in the eye, and tell me who should bear the burden of taxes
Since they seem to think that the wealthiest in this country shouldn't have to be bothered with paying taxes, who DO they think should carry the heaviest burden? Have any of them ever had the cajones to stand up and actually answer that question? Do they think the middle class should carry the heaviest tax burden? The poor? Who?

Yes, I want a rethug to look me in the eye and tell me that a working middle class family should pay more taxes than some fatcat CEO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. And, while they're at it, WHAT exactly should taxes be spent on...
Haliburton, Endless Occupation and War,

OR

Health Care and Infrastructure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. man, turn on some of the liberal radio. It seems they are all being over
run with trolls and paid operatives yapping about how raising the rates on the rich will ruin the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have we completely forgotten that this country had no income tax
until the robber baron's were able to ram it through with a campaign of lies at the beginning of the 20th century?

Teddy was a class traitor that broke up the trusts and this is how they fought back. We failed to follow up and take the opportunity he gave us, and allowed them to steal our lives. Now, nobody even seems to consider that there are other, better, ways to finance government.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Which is......?
"Now, nobody even seems to consider that there are other, better, ways to finance government."

Okay, so what are the ways to do it? I'm not being snarky, I'm curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No problem, this is why I hang out here, to discuss. I wish it happened more often.
Tariffs, fees, and taxing profits/unearned income for a start. It would have to coincide with a dramatic reduction and elimination of the military and police state initiatives/departments.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some would have every person pay an equal amount.
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 12:41 PM by TahitiNut
Haven't you ever been to lunch or dinner with the hog who washed down his prime rib with a bottle of wine while you enjoyed a salad and ice water .... and then, when the check came, he said "let's split this evenly"?? That's your average fat-cat reichbot ... who conveniently has no concept of fairness or equity and pretends that his wealth and success are 100% attributable to his own efforts. He ignores the system of laws and regulations and public services within which he found ways to exploit loopholes ... conveniently presuming "that's just the way things are" ... Acts of God and benefits of Nature.

Oh... his rationale for splitting the check evenly? Well, YOU could have had a prime rib, too. Your choice. Uh-huh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will look you straight back in the face and say "Fair Tax"
To them if everyone pays the same percentage that makes it fair. To a Liberal those that have more need to pay more because that is FAIR. Sometimes equality is not Fair. FAIR and Equal do not have the same meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tn_eagle Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. when I first heard about the "Fair Tax"...
...I thought it was a horrible idea with the 23% inclusive consumption tax on everything you would buy, including things like food. That would certainly hurt the poor disproportionately. It sounded like a very "Unfair Tax" to me. When I looked more into "Fair Tax", I found that part of the plan includes a so-called "prebate" check that everyone would receive from the government at the beginning of every month to reimburse them in advance for the "Fair Tax" they would have to pay on the necessities of life. The "prebate" check would supposedly amount to something like $195/month for single head of household and $525/month for a family of 4. With the "Fair Tax" there would be no federal income tax and no FICA withheld from anyone's paycheck so they would have all that extra money to start with every payday. Also, there would be no federal business taxes to be passed on to the consumer and that would supposedly largely offset the added "Fair Tax" to items purchased since the embedded taxes would be gone.

Lower and middle income folks pay a disproportionate amount of FICA compared to the rich. The FICA tax is regressive. If you've ever paid the self-employment tax of 15.3% (FICA x 2) plus federal income tax on top of that, you know how that sucks. Considering that you would pay neither FICA nor federal income tax under the "Fair Tax", and considering the "prebate" check everyone would get every month, maybe it's a more progressive way to tax than the status quo. Of course there's more to the "Fair Tax" than what I've mentioned. In any case, I've found that the "Fair Tax" is very different than how it was originally represented to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. They don't include wage taxes - only income taxes
Please note that their figures NEVER include SSI, or wage taxes - ONLY income taxes.

Fact is that if you make $10,000 a year, you're paying a higher WAGE tax RATE than someone making $250,000.

Also, they will cite how say, how the top 1% pay like 30% of income taxes (again, not wage taxes) but they won't admit that the top 1% MAKE *MORE* than 30% of all income.

It would seem "fair" to me if you made 30% of all the income, you should at LEAST pay 30% of the taxes.

I'm a radical when it comes to taxes, however, having been an accountant, it boggles my mind to see what ignorance is left unchallenged in the public discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive_In_NC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Can you please define wage taxes? I just personally think everybody should pay something....
With the earned income tax credit and the child deductions, 32% of the country pays no income tax. I don't care if it's 2% I'd like to see everybody pay something into the system if they physically can do so.

We are heading for a 50/50 split and a very polarized country (re:taxes) at this rate. I'd like to head that off if I could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Social Security and Medicare are taken out of your check if you make under ninty five thousand a yea
Neither are considered income tax although they amount to over fifteen percent when employer part is added in. It is part of your wages even though they pay a portion. People earning over $95 thousand only pay 22% income tax and nothing for SCCI or Medicare...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive_In_NC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks,
I think you mean, people pay nothing for SCCI or Medicare after the first 102,500 for this coming tax year. It used to be 95K, but Congress has managed to bump it up a bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think we should try the "trickle up" doctrine for awhile
The trickle down theory hasn't worked too well. Give rich people tax breaks and they don't necessarily invest the money at home. They invest in foreign money market funds, they invest it in offshore accounts, or they build factories in foreign countries.

Put money in the form of tax breaks in the hands of the common people who spend it in buying domestic goods and services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Like logic works on them....
A guy at work says that the guy in the Jaguar should pay the same as the guy in the Hyundai. He doesn't see that the guy in the Jaguar just got a $700 billion bailout. He only sees what Rush wants him to.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC