A shift toward nuclear disarmament for THE WORLD, with this country openly taking the first step in destroying our nuclear weapons.Nuclear weapons are a deterrent. If we ever use the nuclear weapons we have, their purpose will be a failure. If we were to unilaterally disarm, we would be unable to stop other nations who saved their nuclear weapons from taking over large portions of the world and possibly the United States.
Having said that, I worry about terrorists obtaining nuclear weapons. Out nuclear stockpile does little to deter a terrorist group.
We need to work on weapons that are more precise and will accomplish much of the mission of a nuclear weapon without all the collateral damage. I suspect we are moving in this direction with weapons such as the MOAB (Mother of All Bombs).
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/moab.htm or the penetrating ICBM warhead:
(U) This category contains writeups about ICBM sustainment programs to include Minuteman III and ballistic missile replacement. ICBM systems (Peacekeeper and Minuteman III) provide both nuclear and non-nuclear strike options against fixed targets that are heavily defended or hardened. ICBMs with nuclear payloads are currently deployed in Missile Wings located throughout the CONUS. Non-nuclear ICBM payloads will be deployed at launch sites located on the Eastern Test Range (ETR) and the Western Test Range (WTR). High re-entry speeds and penetrating payloads deployed from ICBMs are effective against a broad range of heavily defended, high-value, and time critical targets (nuclear counterforce deterrence, buried command centers, and time-urgent targets that would be difficult to locate later). Historically high reliability of these systems will assure a capability to respond to sudden changes in the world environment, almost instantaneously.http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/nssrm/categories/icbms.htmUnilateral disarmament would be similar to taking all firearms from the police, hoping that the criminals would also decide to stop using firearms. Few people would join the police force and the existing police would avoid paroling the truly dangerous areas of many big cities. Crime would escalate and most citizens would find themselves at the mercy of the criminal element.
But we are working on ways of arming the police with non-lethal weapons so that the use of their firearms is a last resort.
We can develop weapons for the military that in almost all circumstances can replace nuclear weapons. If we accomplish this we should be able to reduce our nuclear stockpile to much lower levels then we have today.
And we may be able to stop nuclear proliferation if we can convince the other nations of the world to join in employing draconian sanctions against any nation who attempts to develop such weapons.
You made one statement in your post that I agree with passionately.
That being said, I WILL NOT stand for a "do-nothing" Congress that we control. Come the mid-terms, I would tirelessly work towards getting EVERY incumbent member of congress voted out of office.
Failure to act once our party is in power will OUT elected representatives as being in the pockets of Big Money. Those who've been elected to their seats multiple times up to 17 will NEED TO GO. I will at that point contribute to ANY campaign that challenges those who've been there for decades, but whose best campaign slogan is "IF I'M RE-ELECTED, I'LL DO X". Time's up. Get with the program or GO HOME.If we are ever to solve the enormous problems our country faces, we must insist that the people we elect represent us and not the big corporations. If they fail to make significant progress in the next few years we need to replace them with new people who will.