Wiley50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:17 PM
Original message |
So That's Why Stevens Wanted His Trial Expedited: To Be Convicted In Time For Shrub To Pardon Him |
|
It figures
I knew there was something going on
The public line was he wanted to be acquitted before the election so he would be re-elected
Somehow that always seemed fishy, but, hey, lots of fishy in alaska
Wonder how Shrub's visit with the new Pres of Paraguay went today?
I'd be very surprised if that guy was bribe-able
He's a liberation theology priest who gives a damn about the poor
Threatened? maybe
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Will chimpy pardon Stevens? Certainly not before the election. |
Wiley50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. He's got until 1/20 n/t |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I never thought of that. So, does he appeal, or wait? Good point. nt |
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't care if he's pardoned, just so long as MARK BEGICH |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It doesn't matter if Shrub pardons him. He'll lose his Senate seat |
|
and THAT will devastate him enough. He's a very old man, and to receive a blow like this will shorten his life.
|
Geoff R. Casavant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Agreed, there is no pardon for shame and disgrace. n/t |
blueknight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. i figured the same thing wiley |
|
first an appeal,which will take months, then BEFORE the new trial, he will be pardoned, and CASE CLOSED. the rotten bastard wont serve a day
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |