malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-08 06:09 AM
Original message |
| WJ this morning - Stevens |
|
Rethug caller - I'm not concerned about Senator Ted Stevenson - he's probably not guilty since I don't trust the courts blah, blah, blah attack Dems. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! :rofl:
|
| Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-08 06:19 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Funny how the GOPers trust the courts enough to let them put folks |
| ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-08 06:29 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It wasn't the Judge that decided his guilt, it was his fellow Americans |
|
A jury of his peers found him GUILTY of 7 Felonies. At this moment and forever after his is a 'convicted felon'. Were he you or I he would be behind bars at this very moment and would not come out until he was prepared for burial.
|
| Native
(885 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. That's completely lost on these morans. |
| KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
A good discussion...the ADN has been at the forefront of the reporting of Stevens and the other scandals.
The obvious solution to this dilemma is for Mark Begich to kick ass next Tuesday.
This conviction reminds me of the indictment of the Iran-Contra conspirators right before the '92 election that, IMHO, put the final dagger in Poppy's campaign. So how do you defend a convicted felon? Let's see how the barracuda tap dances with this one. Yet another important news cycle sucked away from Camp Gramps.
Good morning to you...
:hi:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Sun May 05th 2024, 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
