Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

39-61. 61-39.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:31 PM
Original message
39-61. 61-39.
Those were the margins by which the youngest voters in California voted no on Prop 8, and by which the oldest voters voted for it.

Hang tight, everyone. Change is coming. We will be burying those bigots soon enough. We just have to make sure that the next generation continues to become more and more accepting of gays.

It's a tough blow, but remember that there wasn't even a gay rights movement 65 years ago, when that 61% yes demographic was born. People black and white have been fighting for African-American equality since the 1700s. I'm only 34, and even I can remember a time when straight people simply did not care about or fight for the rights of gays. This legislative setback (which will be struck down in court) comes in the midst of the greatest advances toward acceptance of LGBT people in American history. It is not a victory at all, but a vicious rearguard effort by people who know they are dying out. Their attempts to capture the youth are pathetic, desperate, and ultimately doomed.

The kids get it. They will keep getting it no matter how much hot air gets blown in the churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whalestoe Donating Member (928 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck those older voters.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 05:34 PM by Whalestoe
This is bullshit. I'm gonna write a Prop so they can't be married anymore. I'm 19 and my friends and I find the fact that CA voted YES offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just breathe. Give them time, and they will die.
Time is always on the side of progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Jesus fucking christ!
You did not just say that!

God damn that was ugly!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Ugly as denying people their rights for no reason?
People who would do that can't die soon enough for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It's just true--accept it. If it wasn't for death,
Congress would still be full of slaveowners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. "I'm gonna write a Prop so they can't be married anymore."
I feel better knowing there are people like you and your friends involved in politics!

Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whalestoe Donating Member (928 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's how I try and explain to EVERYONE why they
shouldn't have voted for Prop 8. It's a disgusting, dangerous line we're walking on to vote against another person's rights in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree, which is why I think Prop Hate will be overturned by a court ...
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 05:49 PM by ColbertWatcher
... not swayed by a barrage of hateful commercials or unduly influenced by a rich church.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whalestoe Donating Member (928 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I really hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Think about it.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 06:00 PM by ColbertWatcher
taxpayers--citizens--of CA have already been married.

What will Prop Hate do regarding their marriages? It cannot retroactively take that right away from them! And what about someone else who also now wants that right? Prop Hate cannot deny it for them, when the state has already given it to others.

Prop Hate has opened a can of worms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whalestoe Donating Member (928 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. HEY! Good point.
You rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Have faith. CA's justice system has not yet been fully tainted by the Federalist Society. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sometimes forget how big an influence California is on the rest of the country...
People are talking about this Proposition like its a national referendum. Personally, I think the California Justice Dept, or perhaps the US Supreme Court (with new judges appointed by President Obama) will strike it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Since it is an issue of the California constitution,
the California Supreme Court will lay it to rest shortly. I don't know if they can appeal it to SCOTUS, since they didn't last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maria Teresa Petersen said yesterday on MSNBC
that 50,000 young Latinos turn 18 every month in America.

That change is coming and those young Latinos were crucial in our vicory yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There is a conflict, though, because many of them are Catholic ...
I'm not saying all Catholics are anti-gay (and gawd knows most of the priests are gay), but if they're traditional Catholics they're likely to vote against gay rights, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. I don't think it works that way.
I could be wrong, but in my experience even religious young people are relatively supportive of gay rights. I have a few fundie acquaintances that are 21 and while they are batshit insane on most issues, they don't seem to have an issue with gay equality.

Also,I hang out mostly with Hispanic Catholics that are in the 18-25 year old age range, and I would say about 75% are pro gay equality. On the issue of choice, it's much more divided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Okay, that's good that the young ones seem open to gay rights.
Hopefully we'll start to see many reversals of this horrible legislation after some time has passed...I hope it is not decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. It isn't just the oldest voters that made it pass. 30-44 went for prop8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. True, but as the oldest bigots die, a less bigoted cohort replaces them.
Every age group showed less support than the age group directly ahead of it. There's no reason to assume that the next generation of 18-29 year olds will be more bigoted, or that the current crop will become bigots as they age. So, like I said, time is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenFiles Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm saddened by the results.
But I am more resolute than ever. This must be undone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. We passed a constitutional amendment - we can repeal that amendment.
And so we have our task cut out for us each and every election until it is repealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greg K Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. And THEN California needs to make it so that it takes more than a simple majority vote
to amend the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. My "elder" friends/family in CA are appalled that it is even an issue.
New bigots are born all the time, old bigots die all the time. Not all of the "oldest" are bigots. Only 60% of the youngest aren't.

This should not be an issue, keep working and eventually we will get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's all about the numbers. I'm not one of those who believe in
redemption for racists or bigots. If the bigots die off faster than they can be reproduced, one day... no more bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks!
They're not available from the S.O.S. site yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I don't know if S.O.S. reports exit polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. They don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC