Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The framers of the Constitution were not stupid, but the document contains some monumental screw-ups

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:28 PM
Original message
The framers of the Constitution were not stupid, but the document contains some monumental screw-ups
For 218 years, the Constitution of the United States of America has allowed the District of Columbia to exist as a playground for Congress and the courts. D.C. residents have fought and died in every war this nation has fought, yet they have never been allowed to cast a vote for or against the individuals who sent them to their fate. D.C. residents pay the same taxes as everyone else, yet are denied the opportunity to elect a representative with any say in how their tax money is spent. (As I recall this nation can trace its genesis to a war of rebellion in the face of that particular inequity.) D.C. residents are permitted to elect a city council which may determine how local revenues are employed, but Congress can step in at any time and forbid the expenditure of local funds for any endeavor of which Congress disapproves. Earlier injustices within the Constitution have been remedied, including, but not limited to, slavery and women's suffrage. It is time to address this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. i think the screwup was letting people live there in the first place
i think they should have allocated less land to washington d.c. and reserved it for government office buildings only (specifically, no residents), and the people who actually live in the area would naturally be residents of either virginia or maryland.

i think the idea was to protect the federal government from state and municipal laws and/or influence. i.e., there was a legitimate problem to be solved, they just implemented a poor solution, which time has only made worse as there are now many, many residents of washington, d.c.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree, unblock...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Return most of the land to Maryland.
The land Virginia ceded was returned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC