Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the way the bailout money SHOULD have been used

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:02 PM
Original message
the way the bailout money SHOULD have been used
the clear and unequivocal goal of the bailout was to get the financial markets lending again. it was the credit crunch and the ensuing economic calamity that rang the alarm bells and caused the rush to infuse trillions in an effort to prevent a wholesale seizing up of the credit markets.

the initial thought was to buy up "troubled" assets, most notably, mortgage and mortgage-related products that were otherwise likely to default. this was ill-conceived because at best one dollar helps one dollar of assets. there's no bang for the buck, it's throwing good money after bad.

the later thought, largely stolen from those "socialists" in europe, was to buy equity in in financial institutions. that's about a dozen times better, because for every dollar invested, you can lend out twelve dollars at today's far more conservative leverage ratios.

however, the whole idea is still ill-conceived, because we're investing in troubled companies and worse, we're not actually requiring them to lend. in fact, companies are actively DE-leveraging in order to prevent complete failure, or they're hoarding cash to use for acquisitions of failed competitors, so grow at bargain-basement prices.


the real solution, which works on both moral and practical levels, was to let the failing institutions fail, let the failed products default, let those who invested in them pay the price, and to invest the trillions instead in NEW companies, NEW government sponsored entities, with a CHARTER and a MANDATE to lend. fnma and fhlmc would fail, but fnma2 and fhlmc2 would help bring new homeowners into the housing market, buying up foreclosed houses, and putting a floor on home prices.


of course, a better plan would have been to do this over a year ago, when it was obvious to those in the credit markets. or, of course, to not have kept the housing/credit bubble going as long as greenspan did. but that's another argument....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Chinese Govt ordered us not to let Fannie and Freddie fail.
They have us by the you know whats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. The biggest problem is that that the same criminals that got us into this mess
are handling the "Bail-out" also. It is like the bank robber handling the investigation into the bank robbery. There is no difference because that is what is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. At this point there are about 1 million houses foreclosed.
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 02:53 PM by Turbineguy
Let's see... $700 billion divided by 1 million... that's $700,000

The housing maket has dropped some 20% (roughly) so those houses on average must have been at one time worth $3.5 million each. OK, I got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC