http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10500550Published Saturday November 29, 2008
Psychologist had dual role in confessions of Beatrice 6
BY PAUL HAMMEL
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU
LINCOLN — How could so many people admit in vivid detail to a horrendous crime that they didn't commit?
That was the question after the Central Park 5.
After the Norfolk 4.
And now, the Beatrice 6.
The murder case out of Beatrice, Neb., in which six people were wrongfully convicted in 1989 of the slaying of a 68-year-old woman, is a new national record for the most people exonerated in one case by DNA evidence.
Two national experts who study false confessions said the Beatrice case appears to fit patterns of other cases: The suspects were young people with low-esteem or mental problems who were abusing alcohol or drugs. They were easily influenced, easily confused and worn out by aggressive questioning.
But Saul Kassin, a professor of psychology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, and Richard Leo, a law professor at the University of San Francisco, said the Beatrice case had an unusual aspect: the role played during interrogations by a police psychologist who previously had served as private therapist to some of those being questioned.
FULL story at link.