|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:57 PM Original message |
Are you as eager to see Robert Blake behind bars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Just thinking the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. No, but Bush* Cheney, Perle, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Addington, etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because they're white of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sure am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
56. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. No, I'm pissed off that Gary Condit and Jon Ramsey aren't behind bars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. you do know that they found levy's killer and it wasn't condit, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. thats the point being made. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Yeah, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Unsolved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. not unsolved, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Your suppositions do not a "guilty" verdict make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
62. post a link then.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. They also through DNA eliminated the Ramseys in the murder of their daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. DNA found wasn't theirs; doesn't prove ANYTHING about the Ramseys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boozepusher (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Fortunately in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Oh, got me on my semantics. Fine: The legal eagle can't claim the R's are "innocent" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boozepusher (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. They don't have to claim they are innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. They were exonerated both of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. No trial = no exoneration. It simply means the Boulder DA thinks there is a lack of evidence to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
42. I'm pissed that Joe Scabrous isn't behind bars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Who says "the public" ISN'T eager for justice everywhere? You will recall, however, the civil suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. they ALL should be in jail - don't blame the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. To be fair, I dont think there was a huge outcry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. I wonder where this is headed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Daniels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. I think lots of people would like to see justice in those cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcfrogs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Very good point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my2sense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. Excellent point - nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. I've seen plenty of people eager to see them behind bars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugaresa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. its all about money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. Are you kidding - who doesn't want to see these guys behind bars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. the media hoped to turn the Blake trial into something similar to OJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
58. That's partly Judge Lance Itos fault... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'd love to be on the jury for the Drew Peterson trial - and also Casey Anthony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Do we have to be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. Prison as garbage disposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. i'm as eager or more eager to see phil spector in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
22. of course. especially if they are CONVICTED. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
24. Of course not because he's white. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. That's how I read it, too, and I also find that notion offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
55. I gave the expected answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. Because of RACISM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. You know why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
30. To be fair, who has even thought of OJ to any degree the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
31. Nice race baiting . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
33. BECAUSE THOSE OTHER GUYS DIDN'T GO OUT AND COMMIT STUPID CRIMES *AGAIN*! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
34. Certainly, and Phil too. I am still amazed that the LA jury was prejudiced enough to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
floridablue (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
35. Do I need to be feeling guilty ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Apparently wer are all to feel guilty and also we're expected to pick on the families of victims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yep...... lock 'em all up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobinA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
39. Robert Blake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
40. Not as much as I'd like to see Dubya in stripes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Westegg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
46. Yeah, sure, but I don't get your post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. I asked the question because I didn't hear the talk radio got nuts over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
51. I don't think it's a racial issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
52. It's so sad that this question even needs to be asked. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
57. I sem to recall quite a bit of publicity and public interest in justice being served... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
59. I remember repugs creamin' their jeans because they thought Bill C. was going to prison... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
60. How can you compare? Murderers belong in prison, simple as that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-05-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
61. Yes!!! "I think I was eating a biscuit..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC