Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:13 PM
Original message |
Blagojevich: Victim of illegal wiretapping? |
|
I was just wondering if anyone knows or believes if the Blagojevich investigation resulted from the illegal Bush/NSA wiretapping program or if it was his boldness and greed that caused an investigation to be initiated?
|
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Listen to Patrick Fitzgerald's press conference.
|
Robbien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Fitz got a warrant. A legal warrant |
|
Remember this investigation has been going on for three years. Fitz had some pretty damning evidence with which he obtained a legal piece of paper to wiretap Blago.
|
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. So, it is possible to get one of those things. What's it called again? Warrant? n/t |
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
23. He described "step by step" in his Presser Today what he had to go through to get a legal warrant to |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 05:52 PM by KoKo01
wiretap. The OP bloviates so much he should go read Fitz's statement (probably on You Tube) right now and the actual 73 page Indictment to enlighten his mind. But, nooooo! The OP would rather have folks here think he has "insider info" and he's the only one posting his skepticism. :rofl:
|
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't even care. Just send him to prison already! nt |
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No... he's been under investigation for 5 yrs. Fitz had warrant... |
|
This was apparently "by the books," as I would expect with Fitzgerald.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Is DU turning against St. Patrick Fitzgerald? |
|
I'm beginning to wonder.
I guess Fitzgerald is a saint only when he goes after corrupt Republicans...not corrupt Democrats.
|
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
countingbluecars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I don't see that happening. n/t |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Where did this St. stuff come from? nt |
Robbien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. The conspiracy theorist impulse around DU can't seem to turn off even when the story is |
|
as straightforward story of corruption as is the life and times of Gov Blago.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. No, corrupt is corrupt. |
|
I wish he had gotten Cheney but I think the willingness of people to lie for Cheney stopped him.
Plus Cheney learned a few things by watching what happened with Nixon and with Iran/Contra.
|
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
26. I wonder if he had tried to get wiretaps on Cheney, but was rebuffed? n/t |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
6. he is only a "victim" of his own greed, apparently. |
RayStar
(195 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Isn't it unbelievable that he would get diarhea of the mouth on an electronic device?
|
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
10. They had a warrent based on...any number of crooked things he's been up to. |
|
He's got a file big enough to get 100 warrents.
|
Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
13. No need to be an asshole about this, apparently. |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 05:50 PM by Raskolnik
I made a mistake about the OP, and I apologize.
|
tammywammy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. I think some like the OP wear their tinfoil a little too tightly some days. |
Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 05:51 PM by Raskolnik
But I do think you probably should have actually read about the case before posting.
But I was in the wrong and I apologize.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. Willful ignorance? EDITED: Post abbreviated due to accepted apology. n/t |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 05:51 PM by Texas Explorer
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Look god damn it...I was simply asking a question. It is no tinfoil |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 05:55 PM by Texas Explorer
fantasy that illegal wiretapping has taken place. Thank you for being so rude.
|
tammywammy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
I'm tired and I confess I confused you with another poster. I shouldn't be snarky when I'm tired anyways.
Sorry.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. Accepted. And thanks. n/t |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thank you for answering my question. But, |
|
the attack wasn't necessary.
A) This is my first post on the subject of Blagojevich so "continuing to post about it nonetheless" doesn't apply to my post.
B) I didn't know the wiretap was authorized.
C) My post was an attempt to educate myself about the case, rather than me refusing to educate myself.
D) There is volumes of posts discussing Democrats being the target of illegal NSA wiretapping by a hostile rethug administration.
E) Why do you have to be an asshole about it?
|
Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. Oh, shit! My bad, and my sincere apologies. |
|
It's been a long day.
You are not Texas Observer, you are Texas Explorer.
I was mistaken and I apologize.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. Apology accepted. my OP has been satisfactorily answered. Thank you all. n/t |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-09-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No. Victim of entirely legal wiretapping. He's been under investigation for THREE F'ING YEARS. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |