Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Parry: We ALL Failed Gary Webb. And his warning to American progressive community.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 05:42 PM
Original message
Parry: We ALL Failed Gary Webb. And his warning to American progressive community.
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 06:23 PM by blm
This article is long but should be read by every CITIZEN who cares about TRUTH and cares about how and for how long the corporate media has been helping distract the public from truth. All to the benefit of those BUSHInc. CRIMINALS still dictating policy to this nation - the same CRIMINALS who were protected by the media distractions of the day. It's time more of us REALIZE what the distractions are and WHY they are happening, and then work to counter the ploy with the only tools WE have left - the internet.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/120908.html

>>>>
No one reading this obit would understand the profound debt that American history owed to Gary Webb, who deserved the lion’s share of the credit for forcing the CIA to make its extraordinary admissions.

Though a personal tragedy, the destruction of Gary Webb had a larger meaning, too. Gary Webb was a kind of canary in the mine shaft, whose fate represented a warning about the dangers that can befall a nation whose journalists care more about their salaries and status than the truth and the public’s right to know.

Webb’s death should be a warning to the American progressive community, too – that it is long past time to build a media infrastructure that can support brave journalists who lose their mainstream jobs for telling difficult truths.

>>>>>


On edit: There's a compelling Diary at DKos that touches on more of this story.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/12/10/9337/2915/828/671427
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this. Webb does deserve to have his name cleared and his story
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 05:52 PM by BrklynLiberal
told. He was a hero. His story brought to mind the story of James Hatfield, who wrote the bio of George W. Bush "The Fortunate Son"..and he was also destroyed...and "committed suicide".

These are things you would guess might only happen in a third-world, despotic country. To think they happened here...is heartbreaking at least and terrifying at worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What was DONE to Webb was done to ALL OF JOURNALISM - many didn't realize it at the time.
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 05:58 PM by blm
With the demise of newspapers and the rise of 'broadcast' propaganda, it's apparent now that BushInc and its fascist agenda WON years ago by targeting reporters like Parry and Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Something's been missing for a long time. That much is evident.
It was hard to figure out where the roots begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Reporters who got too close in the 80s seemed to be accident-prone, too.
Promis comes to mind. Today's group of talking head 'journos' were TRAINED to look the other way - FEAR has been an effective training tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why can't an Al Gore type buy a media channel?
I mean, the Fox channel is not exactly purist when it comes to conservative sitcoms. Why doesn't Hollywood give television a shot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't understand that one bit. How much proof is needed that this nation NEEDS at least ONE
honest news organization that can be WIDELY accessed by the general public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. he did. It's called
Current.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Pretty sure he meant a major news channel with easy access for the general population.
Current was a good learning start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's what I meant, yes.
Hollywood should go mainstream. Can you imagine all the talent just itching to get a chance to see their work splashed on t.v.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Not just Hollywood - TOPNOTCH investigative reporters like Parry on TV would be the ultimate to me
and throw in some REAL brainy analysis of the Jack Blum, Jonathan Winer, Naomi Wolf and we'd have ourselves a REAL, democracy-protecting news network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. right. I think it's too bad they chose
such a terrible format. There is no way to tell what is on air or will be coming up. Dan Rather also has that HDTV news show, which I have never seen because I don't subscribe to HDTV. It's too bad they don't take the bones and give them to really top notch professionals. It's great to incorporate citizen journalism, but it needs real structure.

FSTV would be great if it were on more than just DISH (is it on cable?) Link really needs an update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Newspapers aren't "clean" on this...
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 02:12 PM by JHB
While reporters like Parry were out investigating, their senior editors and publishers were lobbied by the Reagan White House, telling them that the reporters were being fed propaganda by communist agents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yep - and also gave ink to Congressman Dick Cheney's smear of Kerry as a 'conspiracy theory nut'
for daring to investigate IranContra matters - it took a full YEAR of evidence PILING UP before any other Democrats would give Senator Kerry's investigation the time of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well worth reading. The synopsis of Volume Two is particularly vindicating for Webb.
Dark Alliance is one of the best pieces of investigative journalism, right up there with All the President's Men.

I've often wondered about the real identity of "Ivan Gomez". It wouldn't surprise me if the CIA was covering up the fact that it was actually a case officer, or someone else with a high ranking, the way "Maurice Bishop" may have been an alias for David Atlee Phillips. We need more real journalists to dig up the truth on stories like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. And it's important to note how EASILY Vol2 was covered up by the media at the time -
Clinton's carelessness with Lewinsky certainly was astoundingly beneficial to BushInc. The media made sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R for the hero Gary Webb
Important stuff indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. great article by Mr. Parry
glad you posted it :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. The systemic corruption in our CIA needs to be rooted out and the agency rebuilt from scratch.
There has been so much taint and corruption in the CIA that has been actively hidden from the American people. And right there facilitating all of it? The right-wing controlled media, which are as corrupt as their overlords. With the few exceptions of brave investigative journalists who are promptly vilified, marginalized and careers destroyed, we have very little access to the truth of what those rogues in our government have gotten away with.


Robert Parry: We All Failed Gary Webb, December 10, 2008

.....

Webb’s suicide offered the New York Times, the Washington Post and the L.A. Times one more chance to set matters right, to revisit the CIA’s admissions in 1998 and to exact some accountability from the Reagan-era officials implicated in the contra crimes.

But all that followed Gary Webb’s death was more trashing of Gary Webb.

The L.A. Times ran a mean-spirited obituary that made no mention of the admissions in the CIA’s Volume Two. The Times obituary was republished in other newspapers, including the Washington Post.

No one reading this obit would understand the profound debt that American history owed to Gary Webb, who deserved the lion’s share of the credit for forcing the CIA to make its extraordinary admissions.

Though a personal tragedy, the destruction of Gary Webb had a larger meaning, too. Gary Webb was a kind of canary in the mine shaft, whose fate represented a warning about the dangers that can befall a nation whose journalists care more about their salaries and status than the truth and the public’s right to know.

Webb’s death should be a warning to the American progressive community, too – that it is long past time to build a media infrastructure that can support brave journalists who lose their mainstream jobs for telling difficult truths.

.....





Thom Hartmann: Just Cut Out Their Tongues, September 20, 2004


.....

The Bush family's hostility to Rather first broke the surface of public attention back in 1988, when Vice President George H.W. Bush was confronted on network television about his various roles in the criminal affair now known as Iran/Contra. At the time, rumors were flying that in the fall of 1980 then-VP-candidate Bush had negotiated with Iran to hold the American hostages until after the election. The hostages were not only held throughout the election campaign, but were released the very hour Ronald Reagan was sworn into office. The ongoing dragged-out hostage crisis (and Carter's failed attempt at rescue) had knocked the incumbent president down so far in the polls that the long-shot ticket of Reagan/Bush won.

When it later came out, in part because of an investigation started by Senator John Kerry, that after the 1980 election Reagan/Bush were illegally selling American missiles to the Iranians "in exchange for hostages" at a time there were no hostages (the Iranian hostages had been freed, and the Lebanese hostages not yet taken), speculation intensified. The key to busting the whole deal open and indicting George H.W. Bush, some congressional investigators believed, would be Bill Casey. As the manager of the 1980 Reagan/Bush campaign, he would have known of the deal, and persistent allegations floated around Washington that he'd even helped organize the initial negotiations between Bush and Iranian representatives.

When Reagan/Bush took the White house, they elevated campaign manager Casey to the role of Director of the CIA. And the congressional committees looking into Iran/Contra so wanted to talk with Casey that they took the rare step of subpoenaing a sitting head of the CIA.

As White House insider Barbara Honegger wrote in her groundbreaking book "October Surprise," Casey "reportedly attended meetings in Paris, France, on October 19 and 20, 1980, with Iranian officials and agents of French intelligence to arrange an arms-for-hostages-delay deal with Iran. The morning of his first scheduled under-oath testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on the secret Iran initiative he was struck by seizures in his CIA headquarters office in Langley, Virginia, and underwent speech-incapacitating left-brain surgery shortly thereafter. Had he lived to testify, according to life-long friend and counsel Milton Gould, Casey would have told the 'entire truth.' He died on May 6, 1987."

Since the left temporal lobe of the brain - "Broca's region" - controls speech, some "conspiracy minded" folks suggested at the time that this was simply a hi-tech version of the mob cutting out an informer's tongue.

Six months after Casey was silenced, on January 25, 1988 in a CBS broadcast, Dan Rather cornered Vice President George H.W. Bush about the whole Iran issue, and Bush became furious. Barely able to speak, his face twisted with rage, Bush blurted out: "It's not fair to judge my whole career by a rehash on Iran. How would you like it if I judged your career by those seven minutes when you walked off the set in New York?" Bush's voice was cracking with hysteria as he added, "Would you like that?"

.....




Robert Parry: Democrats, the Truth Still Matters!, May 11, 2006


.....

If the full story of George H.W. Bush’s role in secret deals with Iraq and Iran had ever been made public, the Bush Family’s reputation would have been damaged to such a degree that George W. Bush’s candidacy would not have been conceivable.

Not only did Clinton inadvertently clear the way for the Bush restoration, but the Right’s political ascendancy wiped away much of the Clinton legacy, including a balanced federal budget and progress on income inequality. A poorly informed American public also was easily misled on what to do about U.S. relations with Iraq and Iran.

In retrospect, Clinton’s tolerance of Reagan-Bush cover-ups was a lose-lose-lose – the public was denied information it needed to understand dangerous complexities in the Middle East, George W. Bush built his presidential ambitions on the nation’s fuzzy memories of his dad, and Republicans got to enact a conservative agenda.

Clinton’s approach also reflected a lack of appreciation for the importance of truth in a democratic Republic. If the American people are expected to do their part in making sure democracy works, they need to be given at least a chance of being an informed electorate.

Yet, Clinton – and now some pro-Iraq War Democrats – view truth as an expendable trade-off when measured against political tactics or government policies. In reality, accurate information about important events is the lifeblood of democracy.

Though sometimes the truth can hurt, Clinton and the Democrats should understand that covering up the truth can hurt even more. As Clinton’s folly with the Reagan-Bush scandals should have taught, the Democrats may hurt themselves worst of all when helping the Republicans cover up the truth.




The truth still matters.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. BushInc DEFINITELY has a serious hold on NYT, WaPost and LA Times. When they need to
tap into their influence at those papers, you know something serious is being covered up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cell Whitman Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wish Rachel or Keith would have Parry on for analysis.
I doubt that will happen, he criticizes Newsweek and the media has too much invested in keeping his reality off the air. The comparisons to the yappers they have on now would make them look like the Bozos they are.

The "media" doesn't want anyone telling folks things like Lee Hamilton is a milquetoast front man.

http://192.220.64.45/collections/conspiracies/parryspeech.htm">A talk by Robert Parry given in Santa Monica on March 28, 1993

So this was what was happening by the Summer of '86, when Barger and I finally did a story - we had 24 sources by this point - it was getting silly, you know? You know, it wasn't like two sources, or three sources, we were up to 24, and some of them named, and we did this story in June of '86 where we laid a lot of it out - we didn't have all of it, I'll grant - we didn't know about Secord's flights, but we had Rob Owen, and we had Jack Singlaub, and we had how the intermediaries were moving the weapons and so forth. So we get to this point, and we put this story out, and finally Congress - which had been very afraid of touching this - the democrats were extremely timid - finally Lee Hamilton, who was then Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee takes our little story with the rest of the Intelligence Committee over to the White House and they sit down with Ollie North and they say, "Colonel North - we have this story that says you're doing these things which are kind of illegal, uh, what about it?" He said, "It's not true," they said "Thank you," and they went back to Capitol Hill. And I get a call from one of Hamilton's aides, and he told me, he said - I'll never forget this, because it was probably my worst moment in the whole Iran Contra Scandal - I get this call from a Democratic aide who tells me that Lee Hamilton has looked into my story, and he had a choice between believing these honorable men at the White House or my sources and it wasn't a close call. ....

And even when Oliver North finally told the truth, which was that he was ordered to do all this stuff, and that there was a cover-up going on - you see, he even told them there was a fall guy planned - it was the first cover-up that had been announced probably in front of 100 million Americans and still it was believed by Congress! So Lee Hamilton again, the same guy who had accepted North's word and other guys' back in August of '86, he decides, as Chairman of the Iran-Contra Committee, that we all should sort of say that it was just these 'men of zeal' - there'd been a coup d'etat in the White House, we'd find out - there'd been a junta of a Lt. Col and maybe an Admiral here and there you know who were running this policy and that somehow the CIA had missed it, the White House had missed it, NSA had missed it - it wasn't like the Russians were doing this, it was like, being done, like, under their nose! But, you know, okay - it's not very believable - a lot of Americans didn't believe it, to tell you the truth - but in Washington we believed it. We all believed it. Not all of us, but we pretty much had to believe it. And at Newsweek and elsewhere we were told in the press this was not a story anymore, this was not to be pursued, I guess because this wouldn't be good for the country to pursue it. ....

Anyway, so after the second show, there was this Congressional investigation, which the Republicans fought, which George Bush personally strategized to stop, and it was stopped in the Senate with a filibuster, but the House approved an investigation - the Senate did a little one in one of the subcommittees, and it just has to be that Lee Hamilton was of course assigned to head the investigation. It wouldn't have been fair otherwise - see, Lee Hamilton was a very honorable man, in many ways, I think, except he doesn't believe anyone else can lie, I guess. He was chairman of the Middle East subcommittee when the Iran stuff was happening - the Iran arms stuff and he missed it. He was then chairman of the intelligence committee when North was going full board - missed that. He was then rewarded by being made head of the Iran-Contra investigation and he kind of missed that. And so, because of his sterling record they made him head of the House Task Force on the October Surprise! And of course then the House Task Force found that it was just fantasy, and they put out their report - and I must say I've read a lot of reports and I think it's the worst one I've ever read - but it was well-received in Washington but I'm going to tell you one little - I mean when people talk about fantasy in Washington - there is this section in this report, and this I think is emblematic of it, where the House wants to put Casey somewhere, and they decide that on August 2nd, 1980, Bill Casey was on Long Island. And you look for why they think that - this becomes important to the story and I'll make it brief. When you look back at this, what they have is that, on August 2nd, Richard Allen - who was then a foreign policy advisor to candidate Reagan, wrote Casey's Long Island phone number on the bottom of a sheet of paper. It was Bill Casey, 516, you know, whatever, and there's no notation of a call or conversation, and Allen when he testified he said I think I called the number, he said, but I don't recall talking to Casey or even if the call was answered. And there's no phone bill showing a call. So what normally people would say, even my four year probably would say, is that doesn't prove anything. That proves, like, zero! If someone calls my number in 703 in Arlington hey, I'm not there! And it doesn't matter that they call my number, or write it down. Yet this becomes conclusive proof to the task force that Bill Casey was on Long Island.



more from DN

Robert Parry: .......And it goes back, really, to what Lee Hamilton was doing in the 1980s. I do have to disagree a bit with Mel in that I never found Hamilton to be a junkyard dog in his investigations. When we did our first stories about Oliver North in '85 and '86 at the Associated Press, they finally -- those stories finally went to Lee Hamilton at the Intelligence Committee. He arranged a meeting with Oliver North, which involved Dick Cheney, who was on the Intelligence Committee at the time, and Henry Hyde and some other members, and they essentially asked Ollie if these stories were true, and he said they weren't. And that was pretty much the end of the investigation at that point. And it was only because a plane was shot down, one of Ollie's planes was shot down, in October of 1986 that the Nicaraguan side of the story started spilling out.

AMY GOODMAN: That was the downing of Eugene Hasenfus's plane?

ROBERT PARRY: Correct. Eugene Hasenfus survived the crash and began talking about what was actually going on. And that sort of put Hamilton back on the spot. When the Iran-Contra scandal sort of broke open in November of '86, he was made head of the investigation. But again, he led it in a way that was not designed to find the truth. It was designed to sort of reach a political solution, which was not to have impeachment of Ronald Reagan, not to have it go too far, not to damage the CIA. It wasn't to find the facts, as much as it was to sort of reach a consensus that enough people could agree on.

And we've seen that repeatedly with Hamilton. We saw it in the October Surprise investigation, which he headed in 1992, which, when at the end of that investigation so much evidence was pouring in, in late 1992, about this 1980 matter that the chief counsel, Larry Barcella, went to Hamilton and said, "We need another three months, another few months to review all this new incriminating evidence about the Republicans." And Hamilton said "No," that "we're not going to continue this. We're wrapping it up."

AMY GOODMAN: And just to be clear, you're talking about 1980, this allegation that somehow the Reagan forces, before Ronald Reagan became president, worked to stop the hostages from being released under Carter, what would have been the October Surprise, and have them released on Inauguration Day, when President Reagan was being sworn in, that allegation, and this possibility, though many have discounted it, of a meeting that was held in Paris in October, where US officials, perhaps like Vice President George H.W. Bush, met with Iranian officials.

ROBERT PARRY: Right. And there's actually a great deal of evidence that has built up to support that. But again, the idea was, of that investigation, was to avoid having the kind of political crisis, the crisis of confidence, that might occur if the American people began to see their government as it was actually functioning, not as some people in Washington would like them to see it, which is as a more fair, a more decent operation. So, Hamilton has always been the guy who sort of steps in and sort of smoothes things over, tries not to have too many rough edges, and moves on. So that's been his record and, of course, now he's working on the Iraq Study Group. But he's never been the fellow who actually goes to find the truth and lets the facts stand where they may. He has never been that guy.


Parry is too honest for TV. Hell, for that matter you won't see many top blogs ever link to him including TPM and TP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Because Parry has always been first and foremost a REAL JOURNALIST - corpmedia wouldn't ALLOW him
the airtime, and I doubt Rachel or even Keith has the power to INSIST that he be heard. You didn't even see journalists like KnightRidder's Jonathan Landay on TV when they had a number of CIA agents warning that WH was cooking the Intel Books on Iraq, did you? Corpmedia bosses STILL control WHO gets heard. Those decisions are MADE in the production offices and KEPT in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cell Whitman Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I agree that they don't have the power
and Rachel should get an award of awards just for playing the game well enough to get as far as she has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. consortium link not workig for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cell Whitman Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. try it again xxqqqzme
it works fine for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, blm.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Thanks for reading it....this article lays out flat the REALITY of BushInc's media power.
Too bad some of our most powerful Democrats helped Bush EVERY STEP of the way while DESTROYING systematically the investigative news business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. The False Reality
I bet Gary Webb hated lies.

From the OP:



The false reality – of an honorable Ronald Reagan waging a heartfelt “war on drugs” and of the major American newspapers serving as watchdogs for democracy – was so much more comforting.

Who cared that the CIA inspector general had found that not only had the contras helped the cocaine cartels get their goods into the United States, but that the CIA and the Reagan administration had covered up the evidence?

Yet, today, when trying to understand how the United States ended up with a national press corps that so eagerly swallowed George W. Bush’s propaganda about Iraq’s WMD, it is worth recalling the story of Gary Webb and the contra-cocaine scandal.



Liars like these friends of the BFEE who import drugs and export war are NAZI types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. As should EVERY citizen, Octafish.
It always AMAZES me that even so many Democrats have given up on their right to accountability of an OPEN GOVERNMENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. CIA Drug Trafficking and remembering Gary Webb
Agree 100-percent, my Friend. Some have been, er, "motivated" with what Hitler termed "the fear of sudden death."

For those interested in the truth:

A Brief History of CIA Involvement in Drug Trafficking

Knowledge is the first step.
Then, comes action.
That's how democracies work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Drug importation would not be successful without a distribution network...

which may explain much of the shadowy historical alliances between right-wing politicos and the underworld. This may have faced a turning point with the Kennedy assassinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Salute to you, patriot.
n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC