Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where Are the New Jobs for Women?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:10 PM
Original message
Where Are the New Jobs for Women?


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/opinion/09hirshman.html?_r=1


BARACK OBAMA has announced a plan to stimulate the economy by creating 2.5 million jobs over the next two years. He intends to use the opportunity to make good on two campaign promises — to invest in road and bridge maintenance and school repair and to create jobs that reduce energy use and emissions that lead to global warming.

Mr. Obama compared his infrastructure plan to the Eisenhower-era construction of the Interstate System of highways. It brings back the Eisenhower era in a less appealing way as well: there are almost no women on this road to recovery.

-snip-

The bulk of the stimulus program will provide jobs for men, because building projects generate jobs in construction, where women make up only 9 percent of the work force.

It turns out that green jobs are almost entirely male as well, especially in the alternative energy area. A broad study by the United States Conference of Mayors found that half the projected new jobs in any green area are in engineering, a field that is only 12 percent female, or in the heavily male professions of law and consulting; the rest are in such traditional male areas as manufacturing, agriculture and forestry. And like companies that build roads, alternative energy firms also employ construction workers and engineers.

Fortunately, jobs for women can be created by concentrating on professions that build the most important infrastructure — human capital. In 2007, women were 83 percent of social workers, 94 percent of child care workers, 74 percent of education, training and library workers (including 98 percent of preschool and kindergarten teachers and 92 percent of teachers’ assistants).

Libraries are closing or cutting back everywhere, while demand for their services, including their Internet connections, has risen. Philadelphia’s proposal last month to close 11 branches brought people into the street to protest.

-snip-

A public works program can provide needed economic stimulus and revive America’s concern for public property. The current proposal is simply too narrow. Women represent almost half the work force — not exactly a marginal special interest group. By adding a program for jobs in libraries, schools and children’s programs, the new administration can create jobs for them, too.
-------------------------------


come on Obama give us our due
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus Christ.....
You know...if you create construction jobs, that's going to add a lot of other jobs down the line.

The Government should not be a placement agency. And it should not be a place agency for particular demographic groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. you have heard of equal rights - the govt. is involved with equal rights


as it should be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe 50% those construction and green jobs can be earmarked for women
Why should women stay in the pink collar ghetto when they can make more in construction?

What I fear is that those jobs in construction will end up going to undocumented immigrants who will make way under minimum wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Unfortunately, strides made during "good times"
often slip-slide back during downturns..

As we entered into a "service economy", we created our own "downfall", because people are only willing to pay just so much for a "service".. Would YOU pay $50 for a haircut? Probably not, but I'm sure that philosophically, you also want that haircutter to be paid more that $5 an hour...therein lies the rub..

Same for teachers.. They traditionally are very underpaid, but as long as we finance education primarily through property taxes, are we willing to pay higher taxes so teachers can make more?

Tangible goods are easier to affix "worth" to, because we can easily figure out how much the raw materials cost, and how much the transportation costs are, and the labor to produce that shoe or car or whatever...but if it's a "service", it gets pretty murky..and the first thing people cut out, when they get financially stressed..

No matter our gains, heavy manufacturing, construction and even light manufacturing is still heavily populated by men, and the jobs for women are pretty much what they have always been..and as the economy contracts, everyone gets hit hard..:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. LMFAO!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Linda Hirshman Sounds Like Quite The Idiot. What A Bunch Of Mindless Nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC