Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

45% Suspect Obama Team Involved in Blagojevich Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:00 PM
Original message
45% Suspect Obama Team Involved in Blagojevich Scandal
Via Rasmussen:

Monday, December 15, 2008
Forty five percent (45%) of U.S. voters say it is likely President-elect Obama or one of his top campaign aides was involved in the unfolding Blagojevich scandal in Illinois, including 23% who say it is Very Likely.

Just 11% say it is not at all likely, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey taken Thursday and Friday nights.

Voters nationally are more skeptical than those in Illinois. Thirty-two percent (32%) of Illinois voters said in a survey late last week that there is no way Obama was involved in the Blagojevich case, while only 13% said it is Very Likely that the president-elect was involved, with another 13% saying it is Somewhat Likely.


Comments from Matthew Yglasius:
his morning on MSNBC there was a lengthy discussion of Obama's involvement in Blagojevich's corruption. Of course, there was no evidence of any involvement on Obama's part. Nor, despite this being a news channel, was there any original reporting of any kind whatsoever. There was, however, a ton of time spent criticizing the Obama campaign's PR strategy with regard to this issue -- the suggestion being that had Obama adopted a better PR strategy, then people wouldn't be on television making evidence-free guilt-by-association accusations against him.


This {struck} me as odd. The people making the accusations kept acknowledging that they had no evidence. One might think that communicating to television personalities the fact that there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Obama's part would constitute a good PR strategy. Given that they knew there was no evidence of wrongdoing, they should have ceased implying that there was wrongdoing. But they didn't do that at all. Not, I would submit, because of any failings on Obama's part, but because Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, John Heileman, Mark Halperin, and Pat Buchanan don't care at all about the accuracy of the impression their coverage gives.


The Corporate Media Is Our Greatest Enemy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. The data in the poll is inaccurate
and has likely been fabricated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's the washingtonpost/ABC News poll....which shows different results....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. MSNBC??? Fuck those dudes and fuck Joe Intern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Yes, because if you don't like a poll's results.
Its probably fabricated.

That's the lesson I've learned from 2008 at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The fact that there is polling on this matter shows that Rasmussen
is as involved in attempting to control the nation's public opinion as the corporate media is. In fact Rasmussen is part of the Corporate cabal.

The sicken me!

I wrote this in reference to your overall point ---> http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-part-of--Motherf-cke-by-FrenchieCat-081213-581.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Nice! What I found interesting...
...about the Rasmussen piece, is this:
"The Chicago Tribune on Saturday reported that Obama’s White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had conversations with Blagojevich’s staff about candidates who were acceptable to the president-elect to fill his vacant Senate seat. Obama resigned from the Senate following his election as president."

Where's the "there"? Would Obama have a list of preferred Senatorial candidates? Duh. Would a (sane) Democratic Governor be interested in knowing what candidates the head of his party might consider to be the best of the crop of potential candidates? I would expect so. Would this consideration of a list be prudent? Yup. Normal? Yup. Is there some kind of double-blind taste-test involved? I doubt it.

Now, Mr. Sane B. Guvnor would still make the final decision based on all the info he/she has and the input from trusted advisers and party leaders. He could also have a different idea and appoint someone off of the list. Sometimes folks get ornery. I'm sure there is history. But Bloggo wanted to SELL the seat. Kind of a, you know, crime.

Ras and others want to take the facts of the normal approach of Obama and the avaricious criminality of the not exactly sane Bloggo and do to the facts what the lenders did with all of the bad mortgages. The media takes the facts, chops them up into little pieces, blends them in different proportions and pours out spoonfuls atop a steaming pile of pundit-sourced bullshit.

The discussion of "the discussions" is gonna get us all killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Corporate Media Is Our Greatest Enemy! We have to fix this
If we even want any semblance of a democracy again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. In other news, 95% of Americans believe Joe Scarborough or Charles Manson are guilty of murder
It remains to be determined whether it is Joe Scarborough, or Charles Manson, that people believe to be guilty of murder.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's obvious that
The media is keeping this thing going. The elections are over, and they need to do whatever they can to not only prop up the ratings, but start making Obama and the democrats into the party that is corrupt, and who "caused" the entire mess that Bush is going to leave Obama!

In my opinion the media is useless! The owners of the media are right wing, and will do everything in their power to make sure Obama does not get elected for a second term. No matter what side they took during the election, it's now time to get down to smearing Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I see Rasmussen is licking those hallucinogenic toads again. n/t
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 02:20 PM by woodsprite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. DUzy!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. We knew it was coming
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 02:32 PM by hawkowl88
A lot, if not most of us knew that the corporate media would start its relentless campaign against Obama just like they did against Clinton. That the MSM will try and cripple the president because he will work for the people and not for the corporations. I have to admit that even I am surprised at how early the attack is beginning. Obama hasn't even taken office yet! This means that the corporate owned, traitorous MSM is worried. They are looking to cripple the new president with a first strike and hope he can't or won't retaliate, and are hoping he ends up as impotent as President Clinton.

I think the MSM is mistaken. If a lot of us foresaw these attacks by the MSM on Obama, I am absolutely sure that Obama knew this was coming and that he WILL take action. I've been extremely impressed with his actions so far, and again, he hasn't even taken office! He is essentially controlling policy in Iraq and Afghanistan as evidenced by Gates actually stating Obama's rather than Shrub's policy! It is stunning. His continual and measured press conferences reassuring the country about the economic crisis are also while Shrub dodges shoes is, well, stunning. People forget that Obama has no official power yet, and he is still having at least as large an impact as the sitting president! This is entirely unprecedented!!

So, once he takes office, I think the MSM corporate owned, traitorous whores are going to get taken to the woodshed. I am unsure what Obama will do to them in the woodshed, or whether the MSM will ever come out of the woodshed, but I have no doubt they are in for a world of pain. At the very least a few more networks could find themselves in Fox's place at press conferences. No questions allowed, no access to administration officials etc. However, I feel in my gut, that Obama has something more planned for slanderous, traitorous MSM networks. No doubt it will be subtle, firm, devastating and done with Obama's invincible charm and style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't imagine why anyone would think that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. MSNBC just announced that an Obama spokesperson says
that the investigation is complete and that NO ONE from the Obama team spoke with Blago about who should have is senate seat. Fitz has asked that no official word be released until Dec 22.

Then MSNBC immediately said "Until we know who in Obama's office spoke with Blagojevich and when, this WILL NOT be over anytime soon."

The media are our enemy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yup. As Frenchiecat wrote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The problem with that and with what Blago said on the tapes is that
it implies that someone from Obama's team actually DID speak with Blago about it. Therein lies the confusion and fuel for the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Well, new info here.
New as in posted to Kos around lunchtime:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/12/15/14536/475/899/673366

Dan Pfeiffer, Obama Transition Communications Director, released the following statement moments ago regarding contact between Governor Blagojevich and the Obama transition team:

At the direction of the President-elect, a review of Transition staff contacts with Governor Blagojevich and his office has been conducted and completed and is ready for release. That review affirmed the public statements of the President-elect that he had no contact with the governor or his staff, and that the President-elect's staff was not involved in inappropriate discussions with the governor or his staff over the selection of his successor as US Senator.

Also at the President-elect's direction, Gregory Graig, counsel to the Transition, has kept the US Attorney's office informed of this fact-gathering process in order to ensure our full cooperation with the investigation.

In the course of those discussions, the US Attorney's office requested the public release of the Transition review be deferred until the week of December 22, in order not to impede their investigation of the governor. The Transition has agreed to this revised timetable for release.


Dear lying media bastards. There Is No There There.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. As Ceci Connolly explained (whined) on the Chris Matthews Show...
Despite the evidence that Obama wouldn't give Blago anything but appreciation, Ceci insisted that the question of Obama's involvement IS an important issue for the news media to pursue.

Why? Because all but one of the reporters' questions at Obama's latest press conference was about Blago!

In other words, reporters have determined that Obama's involvement is an important question that needs to be answered because... reporters are asking a lot of questions about it!!!

How's that for circular reasoning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. No shit they were involved
by denying Blagojevich's request
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. 45% is close to what McCain polled on Nov 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Too bad... he's still gonna be president. GOP smear can't work now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Blago himself had enough guts to admit he fucked up...
Quit being a selfish prick Blago, resign and own up to your mistake!

That more than anything could help with this crazy Obama gossip.

Of course, Blago would have to put the party's interest over his personal interests, which seems unlikely. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I814U Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Welcome to your stolen election
You guys didn't think they were going to pull the ol' Diebold trick yet again did you? Despite the soon-to-vacate vacuous face of their party these people are not stupid. They got us to look right and they ducked left.

They held onto to this scandal for over 3 years for just such a moment. Everybody knew Obama was going to be president in 2004 when he keynoted the DNC. You knew it, I knew it...THEY knew it. They could have pulled the plug on Blago years ago but they saved him for when they could do the most harm to Obama: before he is inaugurated and while the repugs still held a majority.

If--and this is a mighty big IF--we are lucky he isn't being blackmailed. Why do you think he's moved to the right so much? He's no righty they're telling him how he's going to run things for their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Rassmussen polls the 28% who claim to be republicans/"independents"
and 45% of them say "Obama is the devil-incarnate, and HAS to be "involved"..."

move along..nothing to see here:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. whipped up by the media frenzy.....they can't get to blagojevich so they after obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. The media sucks. How are you going to regularly say Obama clearly is NOT guilty of wrongdoing
BUT

In the next breath that he needs to set the record straight on all the particulars or this story is going nowhere but front and center.

How does that not sound stupid?

Fuck 'em I sez. Let them spin their wheels on this nonsense while we start undoing Reagan. Unfortunately, they'll get tired of this bullshit by Jan. 20th and can focus on derailing change we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I814U Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. That's simple my friend...
...they'll say they know he didn't do anything PERSONALLY but you'll hear lots of, "What did he know and when did he know it" accompanied by, "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up."

Tried-and-true formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC