Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Employee Free Choice Act - GREAT explanation. Save this post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 09:40 PM
Original message
The Employee Free Choice Act - GREAT explanation. Save this post
MYTH: EFCA will prevent the use of secret-ballot elections.

REALITY: EFCA does not strip workers of their right to choose a secret-ballot election to decide whether to select — or not to select — a union representative. EFCA simply gives workers the additional option of selecting a union representative by majority sign-up.

Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), there are three ways for workers to form a union:

1) By secret-ballot: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) will conduct a secret-ballot election to select a bargaining representative if at least 30 percent of workers have signed a petition or authorization cards in favor of a union. If a majority of workers voting select a particular union, the NLRB will certify that union as the employees’ bargaining representative. EFCA does not change this process.

2) By voluntary card-check recognition: An employer can voluntarily decide to recognize a union representative if a majority of employees have signed authorization cards in favor of the union. EFCA does not change this process.

3) By NLRB-ordered recognition: As a last resort, the NLRB can order an employer who has engaged in unfair labor practices that make a fair election unlikely to recognize a labor union if a majority of employees have signed authorization cards in favor of the union. EFCA does not change this process.

EFCA would simply add a fourth choice for workers seeking to form a union. The legislation would require the NLRB to certify a union representative if a majority — more than half — of workers sign authorization cards in favor of the union.

The majority sign-up, or “card-check,” option would simply streamline the union selection process for workplaces that have a majority of workers who want to join a union. This is the same majority that would be voting in a secret-ballot election. Moreover, the majority sign-up process already exists, but only if the employer chooses to recognize it. EFCA would extend the right to select a union representative via the majority-sign up process to workers themselves.

BUT, the EFCA goes much deeper than just opening up the election process.

The EFCA makes organizing a viable, but not mandatory, option. The viability comes primarily from removing the loopholes that corporations use to make organizing almost impossible.

Loopholes such as stalling in contract negotiations for a year so the entire process has to start all over again. (EFCA requires good-faith bargaining followed up by mediation and then, if necessary, binding arbitration by a neutral third party.)

Loopholes like refusing the union’s access to employee’s while the corporation tells the employees anything they want. Lies, hollow promises and intimidation are frequently used. What about about fair and equitable access? What we have now is a system that would be like running a presidential election where only one candidate can campaign!

Loopholes like the one that says the EMPLOYER decides if the employees can form a union! (Where’s your democracy support now???)

Loopholes like corporate fines that are so small that companies laugh them off and do whatever they want.

http://www.tonyskansascity.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will the EFCA be a top priority of the incoming Obama administration and the Democratic Congress?
Edited on Wed Dec-31-08 10:10 PM by EconomicLiberal
It would be nice if it were brought up for a vote in the House within the first 90 days. Or will the Democrats continue to throw labor under the bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They say it will be
But with the economic crisis, who can tell. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EconomicLiberal Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, right now is the best time to bring up the EFCA to vote.
It would be nice if our elected representatives didn't back down from the right wing noise machine for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcsmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Added Info (some videos)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. If a majority of workers sign a union card
Then it should be no problem to find a majority of those same workers with the privacy of a secret ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. only TWO Democrats voted against the EFCA last year
The far-right racist nutjobs that call themselves "Democrats", Gene Taylor (MS) and Dan Boren (OK).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC