Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S&P 500 Index Annual Growth Rates, Carter to Bush 43

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 06:52 AM
Original message
S&P 500 Index Annual Growth Rates, Carter to Bush 43
The S&P 500 closed on December 31 at 903.25, ending the last full calendar year with George W Bush as President. Now it's time to reflect once more on Wall Street performance over the years.



GWB just presided over a 2008 loss of 38.5%, by far the worst annual performance of the S&P 500 since its inception in 1950. The previous record was set in 1974, with a 29.56% loss under Presidents Nixon and Ford. Former second place and now third was the only other year that suffered a percent loss into the twenties, with a 23.37% loss in 2003 under The Decider.

Even The Worst President of All Time has some redeeming value. After all, this truly has been a president who broke records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lets hope Obama's 8 years
are like Clinton's.

How is George W. Bush different than Hoover? Hoover did not start a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How is GWB different from Nixon?
Nixon didn't start a depression.

Junior embodies all the bad characteristics of all the worst presidents in modern history.

I'll permit myself a little whining here: I'm surprised I got just your comment and no recs on this one. I put a little effort into building and updating that spreadsheet from time to time. Boo hoo, poor me. Nobody loves me.

OK, self pity session over. I'm OK now. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually Johnson started the Vietnam War
but Nixon did enough other crazy stuff.

I like your spreadsheet very much, and I appreciate you putting it together. It is amazing to think that we lost 12 years in the stock market. This decline has prompted me to put 40% of my retirement into Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. Kind of fire and forget for my portfolio that will hopefully give me a living income when I go to retire. It is hard not the eye the 10%-15% gains that I have had with these bonds in the last two months and not wish that it had been 100% which I now could sell a portion off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Right, I blame LBJ more than any other single person for Vietnam.
Peace, it's still a good idea. :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Nixon started the EPA, Bush wanted to eliminate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. How ya doin' Thom?
I thought you were gonna quit on us awhile back. Glad you didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Except for the vast and growing wealth inequities part, yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Happy to be the 5th K&R on this post. Great work, Lasher!
Keep 'em coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Thank you.
Wasn't nothin'. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandrine for you Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Notice that the big Bush loss was not in 2001
It was in 2002 (and later in 2008 of course). The market didn't tank because of 9-11. It tanked because of the cumulative effect of neocon policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No shit, and also notice that it did NOT happen on Clinton's watch. Clinton didn't hand Bush a turd
Bush turned the good economy Clinton left him into a turd. The Republicans claim that we were going into recession the day Bush took officey - horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree.
And the market didn't tank because of something Jimmy Carter did. Or Clinton or FDR. All you have to do to see the truth is look at the numbers and not be a neo-liberal supply-sider in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC