Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Daily Koz: Union Elections are Not Like Our Political Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 05:22 PM
Original message
Daily Koz: Union Elections are Not Like Our Political Elections

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/1/8/111310/0234/816/681585

by 4workers
Thu Jan 08, 2009 at 08:23:40 AM PST

One of the leading front groups for opponents of Employee Free Choice, the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, is out today with a new ad. The ad once again makes the false claim that Employee Free Choice would eliminate secret ballots (it wouldn't) and the false comparison of American political elections to workplace union elections.

Editorial in the San Jose Mercury News: http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_11388101

The comparison doesn’t hold water, and Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins and Oscar Dace make it clear why in an editorial in the San Jose Mercury News. The writers point out that union elections under the National Labor Relations act are "are as free and democratic as elections in Russia under Vladimir Putin - so rigged in the employer's favor that they are invoked exclusively as a union-thwarting tactic."

* 4workers's diary :: ::
*

The comparison between one-sided Russian elections and one-sided union elections (where the company holds the upper hand in every instance) is an apt one. The writers go on to further illustrate the comparison:

Imagine, for example, a presidential election in which the:

Incumbent (employer) threatens opposition voters and his penalty, if caught, is writing an apology.

Incumbent (employer) legally delays an election by months or years until opposing voters move away or give up.

Voters (workers) are required to attend campaign rallies for the incumbent and be browbeaten during one-on-one meetings with ruling party officials.

Voters (workers) are required to cast their ballots at the incumbent's party headquarters under the nose of his party bosses.

Challenger (union) manages to win, but the incumbent refuses to accept the vote and legally remains in office during years of litigation.

Elections aren’t always squeaky clean here in America, obviously, but for the opponents of Employee Free Choice to compare workplace union elections to American political elections is just deceitful. If our political elections are as unfair, one-sided, and undemocratic as union elections under current labor law, I’ll eat my ushanka hat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC