Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

173,000 Troops in Iraq, More than at any point so far

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:03 PM
Original message
173,000 Troops in Iraq, More than at any point so far
Baghdad, March 22, 2007: There will soon be more American soldiers in Iraq than at any point in the war so far. The incoming surge of 21,500 troops is only part of that picture; in addition, the U.S. commander, Gen. David Petraeus, has asked for an additional Army aviation brigade, as well as a couple thousand military police. Other support troops will be coming in to Iraq as well, and they weren't all included in the original 21,500 estimate announced by President Bush last month. When all this is complete, sometime in July, the grand total of U.S. troops in Iraq will be 173,000, U.S. military officials here confirmed on background, apparently because of the sensitivity of these details. And it's likely that U.S. troop numbers will stay at that level for months more, perhaps even into 2008. That's only part of the picture, however; the total number of U.S. troops deployed into the war theater, that is, Iraq and neighboring countries, may be as much as 100,000 more than that. Last August, for instance, the Congressional Research Service, quoting the Department of Defense's Contingency Tracking System, put the total deployment at 260,000, while the number actually in Iraq was at 140,000 to 160,000.

http://checkpointbaghdad.talk.newsweek.com/default.asp?item=536357

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. To our Vietnam vets...is this a really bad sign...is this what
happened during Vietnam. An out of control troop increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yup, we are digging in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. they'll be needing a lot more than that-
when the cheney mis-administration decides to go after iran.

and/or turkey goes after the kurds.

there are still plenty of interesting times ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You are right but they are going to need a draft to fight their
wars and I don't think that's going to go well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. What they are not counting are the 'private mercenaries' like Blackwater....
Numbers regarding troop deployments can be funny things...

It all depends on how you count supporting personnel, private contractors and their security, 'advisors' , etc.

The real numbers of deployed will likely breach 200,000.

For history buffs, this is the LBJ strategy --keep sending more troops.

And yes there is no doubt the issue of a draft will have to be addressed and soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's only about 1/2 to 1/3 of what is actually needed..
From paragraph 1-67 of Army field manual 3-24 Counterinsurgency, recently updated by General Petraeus.

http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf

A better force requirement gauge is troop density, the ratio of security forces (including the host nation’s military and police forces as well as foreign counterinsurgents) to inhabitants. Most density recommendations fall within a range of 20 to 25 counterinsurgents for every 1000 residents in an AO. Twenty counterinsurgents per 1000 residents is often considered the minimum troop density required for effective COIN operations; however as with any fixed ratio, such calculations remain very dependent upon the situation.

Twenty troops per 1000 population works out to 120,000 for Baghdad alone and about 450,000 for all of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Turkey has a conscript 1 million plus army.
Plus all that stuff that we have sold them as a NATO member. Makes 173,000 seem sorta small, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC