Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Predator drones to protect US airports, planes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:21 AM
Original message
Predator drones to protect US airports, planes?
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070323/1a_lede23.art.htm

Drones could defend airports
Anti-missile system to be tested in USA

By Mimi Hall
USA TODAY

The Homeland Security Department and the military this summer will test whether drones flying 65,000 feet above the nation's busiest airports could be used to protect planes from being shot down by terrorists with shoulder-fired missiles.

Dubbed "Project Chloe" after a character on Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's favorite TV show, 24, the anti-missile strategy is the latest to be explored by government leaders looking to thwart potential missile threats at commercial airports. Other methods are being considered, but Homeland Security officials say they may be too costly or impractical.

The drones, to be tested over the Patuxent River Naval Air Station outside Washington, would be outfitted with missile-warning systems and possibly anti-missile lasers that could send plane-bound missiles veering off course, says Kerry Wilson, a deputy administrator of Homeland Security's anti-missile program.

An unmanned plane's warning indicators could pick up the ultraviolet plume from a missile's rocket booster and trigger an anti-missile laser, which could be shot from the drone or from a site on the ground. That laser would lock on to the missile, essentially blinding it.

The tests follow four years of research on anti-missile laser systems that could be mounted on the bellies of planes for $1 million or more per plane.

Those systems, regularly used by the military, are being tested on nine Federal Express cargo planes to see how well they hold up. Early military tests showed they broke down after 300-400 hours of use, a failure rate that's problematic for commercial use.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh HELL yeah! I'd feel LOTS safer with those things buzzing
around over the airport. With lasers on it? Oh yeah.

"Dubbed "Project Chloe" after a character on Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's favorite TV show" - And which show would this be, curiosity sake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "24", if you can believe it. You can't make it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. 24. Factoid of the day: The actress who plays "Chloe" is dating Rush Limbaugh in real life. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. If this is the same thing, my cousin is the chief engineer
for the Predator Drone program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess we are going to be fighting them over here after all.
Odd that, I thought the whole point (version 7.9: why we are killing Iraqis at around 400/day) was to fight them over there so we didn't have to fight them over here.

DHS is slowly developing the command and control methodology of our counter insurgency operations overseas. But I wonder who exactly are the insurgents here that they are fighting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd be happy if they could just scramble jets on time
Or at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casper Alabaster Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is a complete fantasy;
there's no way such a system will be funded, as it's rather trivial in the grand scheme of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC