Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the HELL are we importing Wheat from China?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:02 PM
Original message
Why the HELL are we importing Wheat from China?
they have so much surplus that they can send us poisoned food additives for our spoiled animals?

What the FUCK is going on here?
I thought China was a net importer of food, and would continue to be for the foreseeable future.
I thought that we were the second or biggest producer of wheat in the world.
I thought that companies feed my precious animals actually cared about quality.

I thought wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wal-Mart world.
Wal-Mart cares about low prices, period. Their standards are zilch. They drive the market. Blame them. I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. you are so right
for instance we purchased a microwave from chinamart recently that I wanted to disconnect the busser on and when I took it apart, remove cover, it was the sloppiest made item I have ever bought in my life, bar none, needless to say it was returned and I won't be tempted to be buying another anything from there again. went to sears then a bought one that is a work of art inside, all the little pieces that guide the microwaves to the heating compartment were so well fitted where as the one from chinamart was, well not acceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yeah, I know, I once made that mistake
and the thing started to rust out within the first 2 weeks.

My present one is from Target. It was only 5 bucks more expensive and the increase in quality is astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Did Wal-Mart make the microwave? No. I buy by brand, not retailer.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 12:44 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. Wal-Mart leads the market
I actually think they help compromise brand integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
50. I don't know how much that is worth now
Wal-Mart is so big that they can dictate standards to their suppliers. The brand may have made a microwave exclusively to Wal-Mart specifications and wholesale price limits. And to meet that standard, they scrimped on quality.

Not saying they did this, but it makes a certain amount of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. BINGO
we have a winner, Alex!

that's exactly how Wallyworld does it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. that is exactly what I was saying
upon taking the cover off it was obvious that it was a cheaply made pos. I have had many microwaves apart too, both for repair and just to look, see how its made etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
72. Also, I think they dictate standards in an unspoken way.
The competition to gain or keep an account with walmart is fierce and ruthless. If unconscionable compromises in quality means walmart will sell 50 million units, most will do it in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. You haven't been looking.
The US is now a net importer of foodstuffs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
96. Why are we a net importer of foodstuffs?
There's no logical reason for that--as far as I can tell anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. Because........
if it's grown somewhere else, one doesn't have to be as careful about paying farmers even what it takes to produce it.

Look at how coffee and tea and cashmere are produced some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a shame, isn't it? I think they'll ask us to start sending our piggy banks
to China, too, soon. They gotta get all our money. Well, whatever Hell O'Burden doesn't steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. That is curious, in that China had a 10% decline in its wheat production
because of drought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. One point: Menu Foods is a Canadian company. Here's a website link:
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 12:07 PM by CottonBear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. menufoods not updating their site, recall info - wtf?
just read that on the Pet Connection Blog website. Menufoods has their last update listed as Mar. 19th. Since then, more petfoods have been listed. Shameless.
My take - buy organic wheat grown in this country and buy organic pet foods without any wheat products in them.
Here's one I'm going to investigate which says that they do NOT use any "menu foods in their pet foods.

http://www.petpromiseinc.com/

Thankfully, I've been feeding our little doggy cooked chicken grown right here in Oregon. Yeah I know - no guarantees there either but can't afford to get the organic chicken just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. "amber waves of red grain" is the new added line to "America"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Good one!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
84. Wave after wave of RED GRAIN has descended on America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. If we keep sprawling onto what used to be farmland, this will be the norm...
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 12:09 PM by formerrepuke
..shopping malls & big box stores with acres of surface parking are devouring our landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yep.
Not to mention ticky-tacky subdivisions miles from the nearest anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Unfortunately, I fear the only way the trend will stop is when gas prices get too high.
Eventually, as fossil fuel-based transportation continues to increase in price, people will eventually try to alter their behavior by living closer to work, but for that to happen, they need to apply pressure on city councils to reimpose rent control and force the government to find ways to create affordable housing for people to work. Cities like Boston, unfortunately, abolished rent control and forced out many poorer residents in the following years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. It'll require political change locally, too--
Every town/city I've ever lived in, the city council (or equivalent) has always been made up almost esclusively of landlords, who then make sure that their interests are protected regardless of the public good. No one seems to notice, for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. Where I'm at, the city's largest landlord became the mayor.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 12:57 PM by Selatius
The city has no rent control, but the saving grace is the city operates on a weak mayor system. People don't notice because few local news outlets broach the issue of rent control laws and their effect on working class people and the working poor. The city added 2 percent onto the state's 7 percent sales tax in order to raise revenue, and it's hurting local consumers here, as sales taxes generally hurt the poorest.

My suggestion at the time when the mayor was elected was to repeal the 2 percent sales tax on local businesses and instead impose a local income tax on income derived from charging rent. It takes some pressure off the poor. Of course, this would anger the city landlords.

The mayor may be in the same party as I, but we are worlds apart on economic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
88. Didn't he defeat a guy from South side Boston progressive, too?
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:41 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Ended the man's political career?

Here in DC we are experiencing a series of "high-yeller Gold Coast oreo cookie mayors" who hire a vast majority of whites in management level positions, and the vast majority of black aides come from the wealthiest parts of the city to boot, despite it being a majority black city. They elected a city councilman who advocated for the elimination of scattered-site public housing on Capitol Hill, some of which was sold to the military (!) and turned a public school into a Gold's Gym (!)

because there were "not enough students left to justify" after tearing down all the public housing and replacing it with 1-BR loft condos for dual-income no-kids.

It is the stated policy of most "blue cities" to explicitly discourage parents with children, and poor people of any kind, from living there.

It's known as "ratables". Check with Boston's office of economic development or Zoning board. Pose as a concerned upscale citizen and ask what they are doing to enhance ratables. Let us know what you find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
87. Yes, and good luck finding an urban, elite liberal or even leftist from the coasts who cares --
I've had no luck. They are personally benefiting from the ethnic cleansing of their neighborhoods. And many "social issues" Democrats were never progressive on race or pocketbook issues, even in the 60s during the Vietnam War there were huge tensions. The overriding assumption then was "black people should riot, look how they've been mistreated, it's not like we live in their neighborhood anyway." Now it's "OK, poor people have had their fun, now it's time for us to 'take back the city' we abandoned. We'll start by tearing down what was there before..." The tolerance for integrated neighborhoods has actually DECREASED since the 60s, according to studies done by realtors and builders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. McMansions need at least 2 acres of land around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #53
80. In FL, CT and NY, they're being built cheek-by-jowl. I am renting in n. Stamford, CT & $750K/lot is
the asking price for property in this neighborhood. I called a realtor about a neighboring 8.5 ac. property and he said there are five lots subdivided at $750K/each lot. Trust me, people will be building McMansions on each one.

Same thing happening in sw FL, where I just visited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
90. 1.5 acre lot is "cheek by jowl"? To eliminate sprawl they need to be built MUCH closer together.
See, this is the problem I have with American attitudes toward land use, especially when environmentalists equate density with sprawl. 8.5 divided by 5 is not cheek-by-jowl. In America, McMansions on 1-acre lots are considered "cheek by jowl" for some bizarre reason. 1-acre lots are huge!

That land could be preserved if divided into 5 quarter-acre lots. I live in a semi-suburban area that is quarter-acre lots. They are large lots for an urban area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
79. you are so right---the RePIGS have been in charge of environmental policy for far too long!
I can't wait until Christine Todd Whitman is asked a few questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. America - We used to be the breadbasket for the world
We used to be the leading agricultural source for the world, but the sourcing of food stuff followed the jobs right out the door.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lou Dobbs is going to go bananas over this one
and rightly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. A Couple of Years Ago
A wonderful caterer in our area was sued and was forced out of business because of food poisoning
which resulted from tainted celery imported from Thailand. Of course they weren't even aware of
the fact it came from Thailand when they purchased it and put it in potato salad. How many of us
are buying produce coming from God knows where and under what growing conditions? Truly disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not that our own food supply is any better--
since the foxes are running the FDA henhouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. The foxes run the USDA too.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
58. Better Foxes than chimps N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why the hell are we importing food stuff from any place that doesn't meet our standards?
Answer: Because it's allowed, and it's cheaper than using food stuff that is held to higher regulations.

The contaminated wheat (or wheat gluten, it's unclear to me where the gluten was extracted) was actually sent to Canada if I'm not mistaken. Then the pet food was exported to the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piesRsquare Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
83. Actually...
The company (Menu Foods) is Canadian. But the tainted pet food was produced right here in the USA at plants in New Jersey and Kansas...THAT ARE STILL PRODUCING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Amazing, Chinese wheat contaminated with rat poison.
Aminopterin. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. My mother used to always joke that "China is trying to kill us"
Now whenever I think of her saying that, I stop laughing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. My 82-year-old mother always told me that China would rule the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I wouldn't disagree with her
Interestingly in a game of risk I had once with my mother, to prove a point she took over china/asia and simply amassed armies in china. Took over the entire game board after about 30 minutes of patiently waiting with pretty much just that one area and the rest of asia while me and a friend took eachother out...cleaned up pretty easily, even against one of my equally sized yet distributed armies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
76. After I heard the food came from China, that was my first thought. Your mom may be right.
The pet food was just a test to see how well it worked? Next experiment...food for humans?:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because we're growing too much corn here
Thanks to ADM and the other big ag companies we're walking corn chips.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. And why the hell are we feeding it to our dogs and cats?
Dogs are carrion eaters; cats are live-prey carnivores. Neither of them have digestive systems that can extract any useful nutrients from grain products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Buy local and organic whenver possible.
That's the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. CSA! CSA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Buy Fresh, Buy Local
CSA is the way.

Organic, Free range, pastured, grass fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. Exactly, know from 'whom' you buy your food!!
CSA is a win-win program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. Yeah!
CSA! CSA!

Gotta love 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
64. what is CSA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Community Supported Agriculture
ie buying a share of a farms produce and getting that from the farmer directly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community-supported_agriculture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
94. Do I remember that you're in Chicago?
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 09:40 PM by mycritters2
I have parishioners who run a CSA and sell in the city. I could put you in touch. Or go to localharvest.org and do a search for CSAs in Illinois. You can search for Farmers Markets, too. My parishioners sell at the Logan Square Farmers Market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
81. yes, if you can find it. In sw FL, local organic was hard to find.
A lot of the tropical fruits came from elsewhere, too. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. We export and import.
Welcome to globalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Other than soldiers, what do we export these days?
:shrug:

Corn?
Culture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. The 2005 value of US exports was $927.5 Billion. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Where is that info from?
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 01:23 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
I recently researched this and I thought it was $894.6 billion in exports vs. $1,677.4 imports in total trade of goods for 2005. Or at least that's what I have in my file. I site the US Census Bureau Foreign Trade Statistics.

I'm only curious as to if there were other information regarding trade that I missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. CIA World Factbook.
We're at $1.024 trillion for '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
62. Census bureau has different info
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/annual.html


I imagine the census bureau is more accurate since it's what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. What are we exporting? How can you ask such an
unpatriotic question? We are exporting DEMOCRACY! I'm sure the Prez will be on momentarily to explain all to you!:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. Yippee! Joy! Globalization Rawks!!!11111!!
That explanation makes me feel ever so much better.

Now I know why we've lost 4 pets in just under 3 years. We thought we were feeding them the good stuff--chunks in gravy--yummy food they'd enjoy from a label we trusted. WE'VE KILLED OUR OWN FURBABIES.

Relying on cheap products that are untested, made with lower standards, from overseas markets that are unregulated--just so we can save a buck, will end up killing us. Literally.

But that's just the very special, warm and fuzzy magic of an unregulated free market, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I highly doubt that pet food killed your animals.
As far as we can tell, this recall only goes to food produced in the last few months. If you've killed your "furbabies," it likely wasn't the result of globalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. No. It goes back further than that.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 01:26 PM by libnnc
Edit to add: I have no link. But it's a gut feeling from what I've read about this crisis. We will find out that this wheat has been in our pet food supply longer than just a couple of months. I'm betting at least 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ends_dont_justify Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
65. precisely
This was simply largescale. Not the "First". Just the straw that broke the camel's back. Remember, we hear about it because democrats have subpoena power and corporations don't want to try to lay low anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. In CA we have GILROY, the garlic capital of the world. Except

my garlic is imported from China!! along with wheat and just about everything else these days !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I just shocked my pals here in PA.---Mushroom Capital---showing all canned mushrooms are from
SouthEast Asia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. it all just boggles the mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. gotta' read them labels- country of origin
as a former Farmers Market manager, I will not buy imported produce. I know what California farm practices are, and have no idea how the foodstuffs are treated in other countries. My one exception are imports from EU countries (usually canned goods) because their standards are as high or higher than ours.

Push to keep country-of-origin labeling, and then do not buy
foreign-produced foods!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
61. I started reading labels last year
when I noticed that a store brand apple juice that I had bought for years suddenly said that it was made from apples grown in China. For crying in a bucket, I live right next to Washington state... no need to import freakin apples from China!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. We probably won't be importing wheat from China anymore
After this incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
75. Do people know the scale? Or are they still on the "10 dead cats" story?
I have a suspicion that many people - even those who "follow the news" - which is a small minority of people - do not know HOW MANY animals have been/will be affected.

And the news stories are emphasizing "RAT POISON" not "FROM CHINA".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
41. They grow wheat American farmers don't want to!
/me pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Not that they don't want to.
They don't need to, why grow when you can just put your land in CRP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'm sure the answer is money.
It's probably cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. Probably to drive down prices
Import just enough slave-wage produced wheat to drop American and Canadian wheat prices so things are cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. Wheat, just like everything else, is a commodity.
It's not sold to benefit the people who produce it, or for the benefit of those who use it. It's marketed for the sole benefit of those who trade it - brokers selling to other brokers. The system is set up so the farmer gets screwed and the consumer gets screwed.

Welcome to Corporate America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. This article is from 2003, but it seems to answer your question...
Though the volume of world wheat trade has changed little in the past 15 years, shares of trade volume in exporting countries have changed quite a bit. The U.S. remains the largest exporter, but U.S. farmers are increasingly producing other crops, like corn and soybeans, so the U.S. share of the wheat market has fallen from 40 percent in the 1970s to 23 percent (forecast) for 2002/03. This shift in U.S. agricultural production, combined with rising prices caused by drought in three of the largest exporters—U.S., Australia, and Canada—has created opportunities for “nontraditional” wheat exporters.

With their favorable climates and large land bases, the former Soviet Union (FSU) and Central and Eastern Europe are traditional places for wheat production. Reductions in agricultural subsidies during the 1990s, however, caused a sharp drop in livestock production, which, in turn, curtailed domestic demand for wheat as an animal feed. While wheat output also fell, recent large harvests, caused largely by favorable weather, have supported wheat exports. FSU wheat exports surged in 2001/02 and 2002/03 as increasing world prices generated the investment needed to expand port capacity. In 2002/03, Russia is expected to be the world’s third largest wheat exporter, behind the U.S. and the European Union (EU).

India, Pakistan, and China have also become net exporters of wheat in recent years. High government production supports during the 1990s boosted production and stocks. When the cost of maintaining these stocks became burdensome, exports increased, particularly as prices increased in 2002/03. However, these opportunistic exports are not expected to persist because these countries are unable to produce wheat cheaply enough to sustain increased exports without large subsidies.

The EU continues to be a large wheat exporter. Historically, EU wheat production and exports depended on large subsidies. Despite lower domestic wheat prices, EU wheat production has grown because of favorable net returns compared with those for other crops. Lower prices have increased the domestic feed use of wheat, limiting exports.

The U.S. is expected to remain the world’s largest wheat exporter, though its share will likely decline if U.S. producers continue to turn to other crops and if other countries find wheat profitable. As export shares shift, changes in U.S. supply will not affect prices as much as in the past. For example, when the U.S., Canada, and Australia suffered from drought in 2002/03, nontraditional exporters and the EU were able to export enough to keep a lid on prices.

http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/June03/Findings/NontraditionalExporters%20.htm


This information was published during the Bush administration, so I can't vouch for its truthfulness.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
60. Because we don't make anything here anymore, except
bombs and trouble???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
63. NAFTA and GATT....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
66. Well, there ya go, thinking again!
You got a permit for that? The thought police will be by to check it.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
67. My guess is the Chinese discovered they had a mountain of poison wheat
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 02:52 PM by Lasher
I figure they were just gonna have to throw it out. Can't feed it to Chinese people, you know. But instead of discarding it they offered it to the Canadians at a very low price. This is known as a win-win in the corporate world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
70. I know this may not be politically correct on
this site but I suspect the reason why we import Chinese wheat is to keep Chinese farmers in business. The same thing happened in the late 90's with the steel industry, there was a slowdown in the Asian economy and the Clinton Administration let the Chinese illegally dump millions and millions of tons of steel in the USA and it bankrupted the entire American steel industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
71. Maybe this will be a wake up call
for people to start reading labels and boycotting goods from China. (With this particular case, it wasn't known)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
73. today they poison your cat; tomorrow they poison your kid...
Globalism is such a sweet deal for everyone: China sends us heaps of shoddy, dangerous goods, and we only have to give up good jobs and entire industries in return. Good times!

:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #73
89. They are destroying the Purity and Essence of our Precious bodily non-GMO foodstuffs.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:43 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
74. Last year the US went from net producer to net importer of food - there was no media attention
blame the media for not doing their jobs - they had at least 24 months warning that something like this would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. pardon me while I hit meself with mine 2X4
WHEN DID the breadbasketcase, the corn, the soy, the wheat producer of the whirled, decide to get out of the business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
78. my first thought, too! I thought we were paying farmers NOT to grow wheat b/c of our oversupply
Now we find we're exporting it from China? :wtf:

Seriously the farming in our nation is disappearing. I was in FL recently and was very excited at the thought of getting fresh tropical fruits and veggies but most stores there, even ones that carry organic products, carry food grown elsewhere.

Very disappointing. Best oranges I hadt were picked unripe by neighborhood kids from their own tree.

WTF? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
82. Middlemen have to make brazillions of dollars and burn mass quantities of oil
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:19 PM by SoCalDem
in the process of procuring and moving the stuff around..

and bump up the almighty stock market in the process..

it's NOT about us..or the safety, access, and affordability of our food supply..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
85. If by "we" you mean the US - we don't - the US exports
more wheat than any other country. In marketing year 2005/06, the U.S. produced 57 million metric tons of wheat. The American public used over 31 MMT and 27.5 MMT was exported .

Menufoods, the source of the tainted pet food, is a Canadian company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #85
91. Facts!
It's rare to see facts sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
86. It's called Golbalization
Don't worry the free-market will adjust.

Oh in the meantime sorry about all the damage.

Where's that sarcasm thingie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
92. We have a huge debt to the Chinese, don't we?
We have a shallow understanding of economic questions.

We are living on credit. Our creditor will gain tremendous power over our lives. This is simple fact. We look babyish whining about it. We took what we took, we have to pay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
93. Probably because the Iraqis were too smart to let us pawn it off on them
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 09:38 PM by NNN0LHI
The Australians were "selling" some poisonous wheat to Iraq for human consumption a while back and the Iraqis got pretty honked off about it. Can't blame them.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
95. Perhaps there's a financial rationale: creative accounting,
right hand passing to the left hand, and back to the right, then to the left again, increasing the volume of cash flow for the corporatist, or some such gimmick.

But I really have no idea, just a guess, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
97. a big kick for Chinese wheat
For the last few years farmers in Texas have been selling their wheat just a little over the cost of production. Didn't have a clue until now that China was dumping crappy wheat on the us markets. Texas farmers don't use rat poison in the fields.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC