Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Should Clean House at Justice-by Dan Abrams

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 01:23 PM
Original message
Obama Should Clean House at Justice-by Dan Abrams

Obama Should Clean House at Justice

by Dan Abrams

Bush took firing U.S. Attorneys to a whole new level so it would be poetic justice if President Obama purged the DoJ.

It should be one of the earliest and easiest decisions for President Obama. But don't count on it.

Next week, the new president should immediately ask all 93 U.S. attorneys, the top federal prosecutors in the country, to resign. If they refuse, fire them. Many of those prosecutors will have been honest, hardworking, apolitical public servants. And yet they should still get the boot.

What? Isn't that to repeat the partisan sins of Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzalez improperly seeking to stack the legal decks by firing U.S. Attorneys whose politics they don't appreciate? Isn't it precisely the sort of politicization of the Justice Department that people like me decried for months? Nope. It's the remedy.

Just because the Justice Department became "Bush League," doesn’t mean Obama has to start out in the legal minors.

After eight years of making obscenity and adult pornography the Justice department priority at the expense of pursuing hardened criminals, it's time to redirect and thoroughly disinfect the tattered department. Attorney General nominee Eric Holder had this to say about the DoJ a year ago: "There is a crisis of confidence that the nation has with regard to the department." Okay, so why not start anew when he takes charge?

more at:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-01-16/obama-should-clean-house-at-justice/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with Dan
100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ditto
Fire them all. They can re-apply and prove their qualifications against other applicants. We can do better across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Start with everyone who got their degree at Liberty U...
They probably weren't qualified (certainly less qualified) in the first place. It's a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You're thinking of Regent University.
Pat Robertson's fake university. That's where brilliant Monica Goodling got her "degree."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks Bonnie. I can take constructive criticism/edumacation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe it is customary for all the sitting US Attorneys to resign now anyway
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 01:59 PM by ThomWV
They hand in their resignations at the end of their patron's terms. The resignations are then accepted as their replacements are named and moved into position. I believe its always been that way. Some, but few, might be asked to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wish he still had a show on MSNBC
Do we really need back to back to back repeats of the same three shows all night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yup!. . Keep him on the legal beat, on his own show...
(doesn't even need to be a whole hour - could be a "1/2 hour of Law & Order" every night.) There is sure to be material available in the coming years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Agreed Fully.
The Bush-era DoJ has become a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Root'em all out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC