Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warren spits in Obama's face; stains unity theme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:35 PM
Original message
Warren spits in Obama's face; stains unity theme
We have a long tradition in this country of invocations and benedictions at public events that are non-denominational and ecumenical. Warren violated this tradition by inserting Evangelical Christian-specific language into the beginning and end of his prayer.

This was a spiteful display of arrogance and division that undermined the inaugural them of unity ("We Are One"). President Obama showed great magnanimity in going out on a limb to include someone whose extremist, bigoted religious beliefs are greatly at odds with his own and his supporters'. Warren response was like spitting in his face.

The middle paragraphs of Warren's prayer were wonderful. However, the beginning and end were unacceptably exclusive. Interfaith prayers should never mention Jesus or non-universal principles. He ended his invocation with the Lord's Prayer, a contentious point which decades ago led to the first bans on school prayer because some of the words differ slightly in the Protestant and Roman Catholic version.

I'm a non-believer, but I can tolerate benedictions at public events because of historic and cultural reasons as long as they are ecumenical and universal. I found Warren's invocation offensive and dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeeBee Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was happy to see Obama include non-believers
in his speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Me too...and very surprised, pleasantly surprised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also the "Oh God of Israel" statement
I understand what it means, but it shouldn't have been included.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That was the final straw for me
I have stayed on the sidelines on the whole Warren issue, deferring to Obama's judgement on the matter. I may not have agree with it personally, but I wasn't letting anything rain on the day.

But Warren's prayer was horrific and divisive. It only sought to seperate people who didn't agree with his worldview by saying "hey, God loves you too - even though you're wrong"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:53 PM
Original message
It was more of a performance than a prayer. He looked a damn fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
47. Ain't that the truth. He behaved just like the jerk he is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Yes, I noticed that one too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Warren sucked and he was just trying to bag applause. I was waiting for "Go Steelers!" or something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. And it wasn't a mere prayer. It was a SERMON with the Lord's Prayer
at the end.

Truly inappropriate and offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Damn straight. It was a sermon, not a simple invocational prayer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. He also has a terrible hair cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Well, if you won't let gays cut your hair, it's a risk you run. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
58. LOL. Good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. As a non-believer, I agree with every word of this.
I have long been used to accepting interfaith religious benedictions in public, for the reasons you state. But the unnecessary invocations of Jesus were a purposeful goad, I believe. It could have been quite powerful without that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't remember any of Billy Graham's invocations
nor do I remember others, so it's hard to comment.
Did Graham ever mention Jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. I heard on NPR this morning, before the inauguration, that he did NOT
Warren was incredibly, over-the-top, irredeemably tacky to take the opportunity Obama gave him--he knew perfectly well that there was controversy over his selection, and instead of thanking Obama by doing the classy thing and going out of his way to be inclusive, he rolled around in the undeserved attention like a dog rolls around in a dead squirrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I didn't think any of what he said was wonderful.
I admit that I violated my long-standing distaste for Presidential inagurations and actually watched this one, including Warren's little gibber jabber. Could someone not have told this fuckwit to shave and buy a suit that fits? Seriously, he's like some kind of sweaty lecher uncle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama should have known Warren was a snake before he picked him up
I just hope this is the last time Obama kisses his considerable ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkaway Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. let's hope that pulled his teeth and he can go back to being...
the leader of a bunch of idiots who believe in his sky god bullsh*t.

What a horrible, small man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Ummm...Those who believe in in a "sky god" are between the ages of about three and five..
..Stop misrepresenting something you know little about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Double Ummm -- Didn't Warren say "Our father, who art in heaven...?"
That's not the sky god? :shrug:

Yeah, I know, since we've explored space, theists have to be inventive to find places for their gods to live.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. I didn't listen to Warren and he is hardly representative of all Believers..
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 08:20 PM by whathehell
As for Heaven being "in the sky"?...No, In twelve years of religious schooling, I never heard that heaven had a geographic location.

Many believe who do believe in the afterlife think it may lie in another dimension, not in another "place".

I'm an agnostic by the way -- I just dislike the cheap shots that are regularly taken at any and all on this board who are NOT atheists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. The term "sky god" isn't geographic either.
You should allow others the leeway you reserve for yourself. When people are talking about an omniscient, omnipotent, creative intelligence that transcends natural law, that's the sky god. It used to be the top of Mt. Olympus, now it's another dimension. What dimension might that be? The core issue here is what's real and what's imaginary. Every culture has its mythology. The conceit here is that some think theirs and only theirs is real. All but one of them must be wrong. And that's a maximum.

Think about how much trouble poor habits of thought has gotten us into. It's not cheap.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. "The term "sky god" isn't geographic either"...It's NOT?...Gee, then .
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 07:48 AM by whathehell
that contradicts you're last two messages!..I can see that in the face of challenges, you just re-define!

"The core issue is what's real and what's imaginary"...Uh huh..and YOU have a lock on that?...Shit, even scientists allow that the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven...You know something that they don't?

"Every culture has its mythology..The conceit here is that some think theirs and only theirs is real"...
Yes, but what you do NOT see is that you share that conceit with you're dogmatic disbelief...Guess no one has ever told you that prosyletizing atheists are as tiresome as prosyletizing believers.

As for the question of dimensions, familiarize yourself with the theories of Einstein (who was not an atheist, by the way) and those of Quantum Physics...I don't have the time, space or inclination to do the work for you.

Frankly, I don't give a flying fuck WHAT you believe, I simply wish that the aggressive atheists here would stop using the most TANGENTIAL of circumstances to start the "god argument" again complete with the usual insults hurled at everyone who does NOT view things as they do.

I've had this argument too many times on this board and I refuse to be pulled into it again.....I have nothing to "prove" or "disprove" and so as far as I'm concerned, this conversation is over:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. I think you're begging the question.
You're the one who is suggesting that heaven is not in the sky. So what do you do when you "gaze toward the heavens?" I understand that words can have multiple meanings, and I'm no more inclined to play games than you are. The ideas of other dimensions are mathematical constructs and they have not been observed, and their existence not demonstrated.

Einstein, (who actually was an atheist, his euphemistic references to god playing dice and such being his "faith" that there is some order to the universe, which he never found) worked in the four dimensions of space-time, not some alternate universe. Unless you have some evidence for the existence of god or direct contact, your notion of god comes from your, or someone else's imagination, right? Is there another choice? Agreed that there is no proof either way for god's existence, but that is true for Zeus, Odin, Baal, Santa Clause, or any other imaginary being. Do these all have the same probability of reality? According to you, they do.

Proselytizing is telling you what to believe. AFAIAC, you can believe anything you want. I am not leading any prayers. I also did not offer up any dogma. Just because people take offense doesn't mean that insults were intended.

You needn't respond if you don't wish to. But I'm always willing to learn new things. :)

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #45
60. I must have a different translation than you have.
Luke reads, "Then he led them out of the city as far as bethany, where he raised his hands and blessed them. As he was blessing them, he departed from them and was taken up into heaven." Jews of His time believed that the earth was a flat round circle supported by four columns and that heaven was an abode in the sky above the clouds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
54. Really?
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 03:23 AM by Seldona
Just about every representation of heaven I have seen involves clouds. Why does a search for 'gates of heaven' show about 19 in 20 images of them embedded in CLOUDS? That's some pretty sophisticated shit for a 5 year old.

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=Gates+of+Heaven&gbv=2

Then there is the bible itself, "And I saw a stairway DESCEND from heaven."

Sky god is in no way out of line at ALL. I know, sounds silly. Doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Ever hear of "metaphor"?
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 10:06 AM by whathehell
Fact is, dear, most Christians don't take everything in the Bible literally...In fact, many believers don't "take" the Bible at all...They take the Koran, the Torah...or no particular book at all.

It looks like continuing the "sky god" attack will necessitate an examination of ALL of the world's religions for reference to it....Good luck with that!

As I told IMModerate, I'm done with the gratuitous "god argument" and so I am, if you will, done with you on this conversation.

P.S. A suggestion: if you'd rather not bother educating yourself on world religions, maybe you could save time by just looking up the DU Rules mandating respect for the personal beliefs of others...See ya:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Metaphor?
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 04:26 PM by Seldona
Please. Why would an angel need WINGS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. Why can't you allow that the term "sky god" is also a metaphor?
You give theists a lot of leeway, but apply the strictest literalism to non-theists. "Sky god" is a term that applies to the omnipotent, supernatural being that is responsible for the workings of the universe and erratically applies his/her whims to our fate. You want to "catch" us on pinning down where he lives. But believers get a lot of latitude from you where their notions contradict reality.

Then you do the hit and run. You make your statement and then close down the discussion. I contend that it's because your arguments are rather thin and wont stand up to scrutiny. You mention world religions and physics and Einstein, but you don't demonstrate any depth of knowledge of those things.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Precisely why the glbt community are up in arms, we were pretty sure
this maroon would pull this crap and why we so strenuously objected.
This and the snubbing of Bishop Gene Robinson have punctured our excitement for Obama. I did not hear it I turned down the volume on the tv and left the room.
I started to lose enthusiasm for Obama, but still had hope after the FISA vote.
I will hold my judgement in reserve, but frankly I am not really all that hyped up anymore. This stuff just licked the red off the candy for me.
Thanks Rpigkkkreestians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. a Steaming Pile of Patriarchal BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. ALL the 'spiritual' leaders for concert and inaugural have been men. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. so noted.
but pR!ck had to make sure we all knew G-d was the FATHER. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Hmm...if God is Father of all
then he must be one seriously horny dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Aretha is all woman and all soul
I thought Warren was rank and inappropriate and would rather had a take two of Maya Angelou for poetry rather than the woman who did her best today but Lowry tickled my heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Never being a Christian, I was highly offended with him bringing in Jesus.
It brought back memories for me of prayer in school where the Lord's Prayer. It always made me feel isolated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kixel Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. #1 reason we must keep church out of the government
I realize the importance of other reasons-but to me, I always think that using religion to exclude is the opposite of what my faith is about. I'm sorry you were made to feel that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wait til Hercules comes back
He'll fix those pagan Christians for stealing ALL his titles of adoration.

Son of Man
Good Shepherd
Prince of Peace
Saviour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. I guess Warren and Roberts didn't get the memo: Play nice! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. "..Joe Biden, a Catholic."
I thought that was a bit much.

As many of you know, I have little love for KOM/SMOM and Opus Dei, but I think that was way off the reservation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Besides offensive...
it was boring and uninspiring. Can't hold a candle to the benediction. That one was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. I have to agree
My expectations were not high to say the least. He not only was boring, but offensive and divisive, too.

I can only hope that most Americans came away thinking the same thing. Its high past time to sweep this kind of thinking into the dustbin of history. Change is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Who's Warren?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. I hope the president and his people learn from this because
we all were dragged through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Dunno -- they were all "singing along" during the lord's prayer...
I don't think they noticed how bad Warren was.


--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
road2000 Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Wish I'd seen if Biden went along with the Prot version.
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. He was terrible. It's over. Time to get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Nope. Not that easy. He's been given a leg up. Tie that to the PIC
crap over Robinson, etc.

It is by no means over.

This is just the beginning. Civil Rights for all. Pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Has Prop 8 been overturned or repealed yet? No?
Well then how bout you stick a sock in it? The "Rev." Warren led efforts to pass Proposition 8 stripping away full civil rights from US citizens on the basis of sexual orientation, and he will never be forgotten or forgiven for that. Getting over it first requires that it be over. It's just begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Thanks for your Democratic "solidarity"
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 05:33 PM by kenny blankenship
So fucking typical. It really warms the heart on a cold day.
Evidently you do need some assistance, since you appear to believe that Obama could not chosen anyone else for the Invocation who would be an Evangelical minister and not also a notoriouos leader in stripping away people's civil rights.
That's pretty fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Who started the subthread with "get over it"?
Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Yeah. Who played the Scalia "Get over it" game?
Just Sayin....


C'mon folks.

"Get over it" needs to get over it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. You seem to be mixing up non-denominational with non-religious and non-Christian. In a
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 04:40 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
country where you are a small minority, why would you expect its leaders to defer to your group's wishes in a matter of such primordial importance, whether you're a believer or not?

Just as some, if not all, atheists, think prayer is just talking to yourself - and that makes perfect sense if you don't believe - religious believers would surely find any personal, "ecumenical and universal" benediction composed and delivered by an atheist would be daft and meaningless, unless the latter had proved that he had the charism to bestow a divine blessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Not at all
I fully expect a benediction to be religious. Tradition dictates that it also be ecumenical. That can mean ecumenical in the Christian-only, non-denominational sense - in a more parochial setting - or ecumenical in the broader sense in a larger inter-faith setting.

Shorthand: you can say "God" or even "Lord," but stay away from "Jesus."

I can't imagine what a benediction from an atheist would sound like! One hand clapping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. How about...
"May good fortune always favor your endeavors, and the kindness you bestow on others be returned a thousandfold."

I could go on, but you get the gist, I'm sure. A benediction does not have to be religious. (You could look it up.)

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
63. As long as its not the "one-hand clap" Hunter Thompson gave a supercilious
Zen Buddhist teacher!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. great magnanimity?
please, Obama sucked up to the very worst of the bigoted right - and you expected Warren to respond with INCLUSIVITY? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. Now Rick Warren can get back to his saddlebacking or whatever it is he does.
I think it has something to do with farm animals, but I'm not quite sure, and I really don't want to know...



http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/artists/artpages/alexander_hoda_saddleback.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
53. I refused to listen to that mo fo. I had the sound on mute.
Fuck Warren! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
56. I left the room when the Rolling Funder appeared. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
59. It sucked
worst thing I have ever heard of the sort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. I keep saying, He's a sociopath
He shouldn't be allowed to give a a prayer at a small ice cream stand. AND he's an asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
65. nothing about Warren's presence or participation is defensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
66. That wasn't really very reachy-outy of him was it? n/t
As far as I can tell, the Republicans are still pulling their partisan BS today. The magic Warren bullet doesn't seem to have been the reassuring panacea we were assured he was going to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC