Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A possible reason why the official reported pet death numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:48 PM
Original message
A possible reason why the official reported pet death numbers
are so low????

Yesterday a client reminded me of a case 18 months ago that was EXACTLY like these current cases, and so I wanted to report it to the FDA. When I have tried to call the area Complaints Coordinator over the past 2 days, the phone message says to leave a contact number in voicemail, but THE VOICEMAIL BOX IS ALWAYS FULL.

They appear to have inadequate staff to field all the calls, or aren't checking their voicemail, so OF COURSE they don't know the real numbers. How many vets with REAL CASES of this give up trying to contact the FDA because they are busy practitioners with work to do?

I still haven't reached FDA. I was able to fax a report to LA COunty, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's awful, and should never happen, but there's also another
reason the death numbers are low. In my case, my cat is 19 years old. Sure he seems happy & healthy, but if he died tomorrow, it would never have occurred to me that it was caused by anything but old age.

I would think alot ofanimals fall into a catagory like that. Renal failure is difficult for the average person to diagnose, and I suspect many would believe the pet had died from natural causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I'm surprised the outbreak was noticed.
I'm curious to see how the FDA linked 10 pet deaths to the food. It seems to ba a small number to base a recall on. I wonder if there is more to the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't trust the FDA anymore.
Ever since they got too cozy with Big Pharmas, all they care about is the money. If something is not approved by the FDA, I assume it will probably be better for me or the pets. How screwed up is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Blame USDA for this
Its these guys responsibility to inspect factories the process food. There aren't nearly enough inspectors for human food let alone pet food. Thats why we will keep seeing this kind of crap for both human and pet products. FDA's responsibility is to keep track of the contamination. Its not what FDA and USDA (and EPA too) are DOING thats the problem. Its what they are NOT doing. No enforcement of regs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Wrong. FDA is in charge of inspecting pet food manufacturing.
I called USDA at the start of this and they said they had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I thought that USDA..
did all the animal work. I swear I read an article quoting a USDA guy complaining that they were way understaffed. Hmm. Maybe the article was wrong. Of course I bet FDA and USDA will point fingers at each other to blame. Isn't that the way things work these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. USDA inspects meat for human consumption.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 06:50 PM by kestrel91316
When I called USDA they indicated they had nothing to do with animal feeds.

Here you go:
http://www.fda.gov/cvm/aboutcvm.html

But here's the rub. FDA REGULATES. There is no ongoing inspection like there is for human foods. They apparently only get involved when a problem turns up. And then pass more regulations.

Not the way I'd do it if I were in charge, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks for the info
Passing regs only helps if you actually enforce the damn things and it doesn't seem like that happens. But maybe enough "bad press" will help. I think certain pet food companies are going to be filing bankrupcy very very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. how the hell is this pet food made?!
It sounds really weird that so many companies are purchasing from one source.

This is really sickening. I don't have pets right now (except fish) but if i do get a dog someday (allergic to kitties, unfortunately), they're eating home-cooked, organic, or pet food from Whole Foods. I don't trust brand-name canned foods anymore!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. You should think about how OUR food is made /processed too.
Think of all the once-independent companies that are now just a part of another giant conglomerate.

Their products are probably made the same way.

all those "ingredients" in your food that you cannot pronounce come from somewhere...probably all come form a few (or less) suppliers..

this scare might be the canary in the coal mine that starts to wake people up..

take Kraft for instance.. It's not just mac & cheese anymore:

Most of these "kraft family brands" used to be independent companies , sourcing their ingredients from many places.

http://www.kraft.com/brands/namerica/us.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pugee Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought that they were only referring to the "test" animals that died
Petconnection is informally trying to get some idea of the number just to show that it is a big problem. They were advocating reporting to the FDA, but the FDA is not making it easy. They do link to the FDA site, although their main concern is the recall and source of the poison. Too many people don't trust the government to worry about it anyway. More info on who to report to here:

http://www.petconnection.com/blog/category/2007-food-recall/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. THis is the underfunded, crony-filled FDA
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. along with USDA and EPA as well.
I think all us pet owners should send our cans of recalled food to the White House and have it fed to their pets and see how they like it!!!:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You may be getting a visit from Agent Mike.
Make sure to have a beer for him. I hear he drinks Bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. We had to put down our sheltie about a year and a half ago when
she suddenly developed kidney failure. Up until a month or so before she died, she had always been very healthy.

One of the first things my husband asked when I told him about the pet food problems was, "Do you think that's what happened to Sweetums?"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I lost a feline pationt a year ago to ARF, and never suspected food.
It turns out (I know because the owner called me yesterday about it) that he was feeding the cat a lot of Authority chicken slices in gravy.

Was the contaminated gluten in use then, with less of the aminopterin, so it took more to do the job?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is not a statistic if it is not recorded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC