Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama DNI choice won't call waterboarding torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:41 PM
Original message
Obama DNI choice won't call waterboarding torture
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 03:46 PM by babylonsister
Obama CIA choice won't call waterboarding torture
Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:32pm GMT


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's choice to head National Intelligence declined on Thursday to call waterboarding "torture," only days after his attorney general nominee condemned the interrogation practice as precisely that.

Retired Adm. Dennis Blair replied cautiously when pressed on the waterboarding question at a hearing on his nomination to be director of national intelligence.

The caution reflected a public debate over whether to prosecute CIA employees who used the simulated drowning technique. Torture is banned by U.S. and international laws.

"There will be no waterboarding on my watch. There will be no torture on my watch," Blair said, refusing to go further.

In contrast, attorney general nominee Eric Holder flatly told his confirmation hearing last week, "Waterboarding is torture." The statement was a break from years in which Bush administration officials rejected that characterization.

Michigan Democratic Sen Carl Levin told Blair, "If the attorney general designee can answer it, you can too,"

more...

http://uk.reuters.com/article/usPoliticsNews/idUKTRE50L63F20090122?sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. well then, time for some water-boarding
to see if we can get an answer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait - what happened to Panetta?
Did he drop out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Panneta is to be head of CIA
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 03:45 PM by bigtree
Blair is up for Director of Intelligence who oversees ALL of the (16?) intelligence agencies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. uh, Leon Panetta is director of the CIA.
Pathetic that they can't even get that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, you're right. Blair is the nominee for Director of Nat'l Intel. OP edited. nt
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 03:48 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. especially bad for this story
it would have been a major flip flop if it were Panetta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is badly written, unless I am mistaken - Blair isn't the head
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 03:44 PM by jsamuel
he is the sub-head. Panetta is going to be the head, while Blair is a holdover from Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. "There will be no waterboarding on my watch. There will be no torture on my watch,"
He is probably not wanting to call his future employees torturers. It will be up to Holder and the DoJ to call it torture and pursue investigations and indictments. It is Blair's job to end the practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. good for Levin for asking him
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC