Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge James Pohl rejects Obama delay request.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:36 PM
Original message
Judge James Pohl rejects Obama delay request.
Page last updated at 19:45 GMT, Thursday, 29 January 2009


Judge rejects Obama delay request


A military judge at the Guanatanamo Bay detention facility has rejected a request by US President Barack Obama to suspend the trial of a detainee.

Correspondents say this could be a setback to Mr Obama's plans to close the facility.

Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a Saudi citizen, is accused of planning the USS Cole attack of October 2000.

The White House said it was consulting the Pentagon and justice department about its possible options.

Judge James Pohl said the request to halt the trial to allow a review by the new administration was "unpersuasive".

The trial of Mr Nashiri will go ahead, he ruled

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7859224.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. uh, isn't he his, like, commander-in-chief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, I thought so.
So I'm not sure what the judge thinks he's doing, other than bucking for early retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Subject to Laws
as ruled by Judges. Something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. insubordination...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's been awhile..
but the Judicial branch RULES on what the Executive and Judicial branches come up with. This is not insubordination because this is a Judge! The trial has already started. It's in his jurisdiction (check that word). This is the balance of power that has been lacking for the past eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. dang ..
this is supposed to say "Executive and Legislative branches" .. old brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I asked that on another thread
and it sanked like a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Military judges don't take orders from the CIC
Never have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. So what!! Move the fucker to another prison and have the trial there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC