Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Officials "concerned that harsh limits" on executive pay could discourage firms from asking for aid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:36 PM
Original message
Officials "concerned that harsh limits" on executive pay could discourage firms from asking for aid
A Multi-Pronged Bank Plan
Administration Finalizing Strategy, Probably Won't Toughen Pay Restrictions

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003742.html?hpid=topnews

By David Cho
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 31, 2009; Page D01

The Obama administration has finished drafting the central elements of its plan to rescue the financial markets and is gathering feedback from regulators and Wall Street executives, sources familiar with the matter said yesterday.

While some details need to be hammered out, the strategy is likely to be laid out publicly in about a week, the sources said.

In finalizing the plan, officials have made a policy decision that could dismay lawmakers. The administration is likely to refrain from imposing tougher restrictions on executive compensation at most firms receiving government aid but instead retain looser requirements initially included in the Treasury's $700 billion rescue program, a source familiar with the deliberations said. Officials are concerned that harsh limits could discourage some firms from asking for aid.

The administration envisions a range of initiatives to jump-start the consumer credit markets, provide aid to struggling homeowners, and motivate banks to increase lending. The plan will also offer banks more capital and buffer them against losses on portfolios of "toxic" assets, backed by failing mortgages and other troubled loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL - then don't ask for it.
:rofl:

*poutyface* they want us to cut salaries, well to hell with them, we just won't ask for their help - we don't need them *poutyface*

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. If exec comp makes them hesitate to ask for aid
they don't need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, if they'd rather go down rich, let 'em go down.
This argument is as idiotic as the one justifying the bonuses as necessary for retention of key personnel in a RECESSION. Supposedly, the bonuses were based on profit AND THERE HAVEN'T BEEN ANY PROFITS, unless the bailout money is counted as profit in which case we need to stop that thinking immediately.

Protecting the mansions of executives should not be our goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's called FREE MARKET.....
it's been so long since folks saw a true free market in actio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good! Let those that don't liquidate their own assets to pay for their too high salaries. (nt)
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 12:44 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good!
It will show just how "greedy" these guys are, and how little they care about the country and the problems we are in, and only care about their own bank account! If they don't want to have restrictions set on them, let them go under!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think its a silly argument,
and hope that President Obama rejects it as a reason NOT to demand something from the b******s who begged and THEN gave bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. tough shit for them, then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. They they either don't need or don't deserve it - Easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good
I don't see a problem here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, now, doesn't that just peg your irony meter?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh for fucks sake ...what a bunch of horse shit.
Wall street executives should be tar'd and feathered and then kicked out of this country, bunch of diaper wearing sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. then they fail, and they are out of work and get no pay.
fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. And that would be bad because... ?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, because four hundred grand a year is right at the POVERTY level! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. 400k / yr .... or ..... minimum wage. Which is "harsh"?
how ever can they make ends meet on $200 per hour? poor things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Pfffft. Fine. If the company is sinking the board of directors will ask for aid -
and they will fire who ever needs to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Awwww, don't that just break your heart?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. At the very least excutive pay should be tied to company performance
If the company does well reward them for a job well done. But this horseshit about getting golden parachutes when they run a company into the ground needs to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Tie it to CEO pay in Japan
Republicans have no problem making hourly auto workers pay even with those a the transplant factory. I think they approved the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC