Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

200 years ago tommorow the British Empire made it illegal to own slaves.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:08 PM
Original message
200 years ago tommorow the British Empire made it illegal to own slaves.
That's not that long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. So when are they going to stop having slaves in the former
empire? Maybe 200 years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was only in Britain
the said Brits kept slaves in the Caribbean until 1834 and then announced a four year apprenticeship until 1838. Then they everything they could (passed a whole pile of laws denying property rights, introducing vagrancy acts etc, built prisons) to keep our ancestors on their plantations and dragged hundreds of thousands of Indians from India as indentured labourers.

And how different is what they're doing in Iraq? Imperialists will never fool me or mine again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was only the slave trade, ie transportation of slaves from Africa
that was abolished in 1807. Slavery itself wasn't abolished for another 26 years.

The slave trade was deeply embedded in the economies of England, the Americas, and much of Europe; many merchants, ship owners, bankers, and politicians feared an economic collapse if the slave trade were abolished. But others, particularly eyewitnesses of the slave trade, were so appalled that they resolved to put a stop to it. Leading this crusade was William Wilberforce (1759-1833), a Member of Parliament whose evangelical convictions made him an exemplar of humanitarianism. Wilberforce and a cadre of like-minded reformers worked tirelessly to raise public awareness of the cruelties of the trade and to pressure Parliament for reforms. After years of setbacks and defeats, the slave trade was abolished in the British Empire in 1807. It took 26 more years of agitation to abolish slavery within the British Empire. In the U.S., the movement to end slavery, abolitionism, also involved many Christian activists.

http://demo.lutherproductions.com/historytutor/basic/modern/genknow/end-slavery.htm



After the passing of Abolition of the Slave Trade Act in 1807, British captains who were caught continuing the trade were fined £100 for every slave found on board. However, this law did not stop the British slave trade. If slave-ships were in danger of being captured by the British navy, captains often reduced the fines they had to pay by ordering the slaves to be thrown into the sea.

Some people involved in the anti-slave trade campaign argued that the only way to end the suffering of the slaves was to make slavery illegal. A new Anti-Slavery Society was formed in 1823. Members included Thomas Clarkson, Henry Brougham, William Wilberforce, Thomas Fowell Buxton, Elizabeth Heyrick, Mary Lloyd, Jane Smeal, Elizabeth Pease and Anne Knight).

Parliament passed the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833. This act gave all slaves in the British Empire their freedom. The British government paid compensation to the slave owners. The amount that the plantation owners received depended on the number of slaves that they had. For example, the Bishop of Exeter's 665 slaves resulted in him receiving £12,700.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Lslavery33.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely correct...
...and a needed corrective to the Hollywood revisionism of Amazing Grace, which makes the abolition of the slave trade into the high point of the fight for emancipation in order to provide a cliched "happy ending" to the movie. (In truth, Wilberforce carried on his fight against slavery, but died an old man several months before the final Slavery Abolition Act passed.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC