Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tokenism You Can Believe In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:15 PM
Original message
Tokenism You Can Believe In
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 02:24 PM by ihavenobias
NOTE: This was and I thought I would share it here. After you check it out, I recommend you watch this new video:

Tokenism You Can Believe In
By MRFred

The Republicans picked Micheal Steele as its chairman. What a surprise! Mr. Steel phrased it like this:

"This is a remarkable moment. Some say it's historic, but it's just one more bold step that the party of Lincoln has taken since its founding."

Let the freedom train roll on brother!

Well, on second thought, not as remarkable as the Republicans would have you believe. The Democratic Party elected its first black chairman, Ron Brown, in a remarkable moment in 1989. At the time the Democrats were unremarkably criticized by Republicans and "conservative pundits" for picking Brown, in their words, who was only chosen to "appease" black voters who supported Jesse Jackson in 1988. Limbaugh in his usual bombastic mode called it a "politically correct" move.

Regardless of Mr. Steele's spin (on his selection) all is not sweetness and light at the RNC. Steele was opposed by most "conservative" activists who accused Steele of being insufficiently conservative. You can read that to mean insufficiently white.

Mr. Steele has a daunting task, namely to convince minorities/African Americans, that the party that has sung the praises of segregationists like Strom Thurman, Trent Lott, Jesse Helms, Tom Tancredo and others, cares about them.

Particularly since the conservatives new spin on the housing crisis and resulting recession tosses the African Americans they openly courted in 2004 under the bus in 2008.

In 2004 the “ownership society” in the Republican lexicon was used by black Republicans to explain why blacks and minorities should support the GOP. The “ownership society” according to Bush in a 2004 speech (at Freddy Mac headquarters no less) meant " homes and small businesses, increased self-reliance and small government." All allegedly key Republican core values to be sure. Of course this was made possible in the Republican spin by less government regulation, entrepreneurship and low taxes.

Not so much in 2008. The “ownership society” as envisioned by Bush and the Republicans is a failure. A broken promise, more precisely a false promise, in light of sub-prime mortgage scams that preyed disproportionately on minorities by unregulated entrepreneurs.

Subsequently the collapse of Wall Street financial houses and the federal bailout of the party insiders and contributors who orchestrated the now global financial meltdown has rightfully pissed off the African Americans that may have considered the GOP in the past.

Yep, the . After all, they reasoned, they are largely responsible because they have crappy credit. Yes, that must be it, affirmative action and fair housing, not greedy bankers and duplicitous Republican politicians, caused the problem. You know, those shiftless sub-prime minority borrowers. Remarkable. (Note By Ihavenobias: to read some brilliant reporting from Daniel Gross of Newsweek on why the conservative argument on these issues is complete BS)

In another "remarkable moment" Mr Steele was trying to put the best spin he could on why so few black Republicans were present at the 2008 Convention. During an on-camera interview Steele said the outreach effort "was inadequate".

Inadequate indeed. Consider the photo below of the 2008 Republican Convention opening ceremony. 10 African Americans were in attendance. 11, if you count the TV camera man at the lower left.



Steele's task is made all the more urgent by a recent poll by . The JCPES noted a 60-percent decline in black identification with the Republican Party as compared to four years ago. In 2004 the Republican National Convention in New York City, BlackAmericaWeb.com reported on the "record number" of GOP delegates of color in attendance, 167 or nearly 7 percent of all delegates.

At least Mike has a pretty low bar. Overall there were 36 black delegates representing 1.5 percent of the participants, the worst showing in 40 years. All he needs to do is recruit 36 more black delegates to have a 100% improvement.

If that fails he can increase the attendance numbers by counting the concession and janitorial staff at the next convention.

Remarkable, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, I do, I do believe in it! Yep, it's tokenism, all right.
But I suggest that the GOP will find that this token won't let them ride all the way to the next election; and they don't seem to have any ability to acquire a transfer. It's likely that they can find no change in their right pocket, and won't look anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. As a token to the "ownership society" ...
they are the rich and their color is greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Such shameless pandering.
I wonder if this will drive a large part of their base right into the hands of a third party? From my experience these racists are generally highly motivated by their beliefs. I doubt they are going to forgive, much less forget, for political expediency's sake.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wouldn't that be awesome?
The party is already on life-support, and it'd be great if this pulled the plug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. oh my, a big K & R for MRFred. I'll have to check him out more often.
Interesting point he made about Slush Rumball calling it 'politically correct' when Ron Brown was elected.

What does the Son Of Blubber say now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azlady Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Chairman See-we've-got-one-too is still playing third banana to Rush and Palin**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC