Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Plan for Replacing Certain United States Attorneys" exposes coordination with WH (Miers and Rove)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:02 AM
Original message
"Plan for Replacing Certain United States Attorneys" exposes coordination with WH (Miers and Rove)
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 12:09 AM by seafan
With a grand tip of the hat to this blog, for this great find.

Confirmation of specific details about a portion of the direct involvement of White House Counsel (Harriet Miers) AND the WH Office of Political Affairs (Karl Rove) is in the information below.

(Bolding and underlining added)





Documents: How to fire a U.S. Attorney

The "Plan for Replacing Certain United States Attorneys" lays out a step-by-step procedure for firing these "underperforming" attorneys. Page 2 of the document is especially interesting.]




Abbreviations used in the documents

AG: Attorney General
AGAC: Attorney General's Advisory Committee
DOJ: Department of Justice
EOUSA: Executive Office for United States Attorneys
OAG: Office of the Attorney General
ODAG: Office of the Deputy Attorney General
USAs: U.S. Attorneys
USATXW: U.S. Attorney, Texas
WHCO: White House Counsel
WH OPA: White House Office of Political Affairs





Mercer, William W
From: Sampson, Kyle
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:51 PM
To: Mercer, William W
Subject: Heads up

Attachments: USA replacement plan.doc

Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader — like across the board — plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for details.



PLAN FOR REPLACING CERTAIN
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS

STEP 1


Senator calls: On December 7, the following Republican home-state Senators or, where there is no Republican home-state Senator, the home-state "Bush political lead" are contacted:

* AG calls Jon Kyl (re Charlton)
* WHCO calls John Ensign (re Bogden)
* WHCO calls Pete Domenici (re Iglesias)
* WH OPA calls California political lead (re Lam and Ryan)
* WH OPA calls Michigan political lead (re Chiara)
* WH OPA calls Washington political lead (re McKay)

AG/WHCO/WH OPA inform the Senators/Bush political leads as follows:


* The administration has determined to give someone else the opportunity to serve as U.S. Attorney in for the final two years of the Administration.
* has been informed of this determination and knows that we intend to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007.
* We will look to you, Senator/Bush political lead, to recommend candidates that we should consider for appointment as the new U.S. Attorney. As always, we ask that you recommend at least three candidates for the President's consideration. Importantly, we ask that you make recommendations as soon as possible.

STEP 2

U.S. Attorney calls: On December 7 (very important that Senator calls and U.S. Attorney calls happen simultaneously), Mike Battle contacts the following U.S. Attorneys:

* Paul Charlton (D. Ariz.)
* Carol Lam (S.D. Cal.)
* Kevin Ryan (N.D. Cal.)
* Margaret Chiara (W.D. Mich.)
* Dan Bogden (D. Nev.)
* David Iglesias (D.N.M.)
* John McKay (W.D. Wash.)



Battle informs the U.S. Attorneys as follows:


* What are you plans with regard to continued service as U.S. Attorney?
* The Administration is grateful for your service as U.S. Attorney, but has determined to give someone else the opportunity to serve as U.S. Attorney in your district for the final two years of the Administration.
* We will work with you to make sure that there is a smooth transition, but intend to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007.

STEP 3

Prepare to Withstand Political Upheaval: U.S. Attorneys desiring to save their jobs (aided by their allies in the political arena as well as the Justice Department community), likely will make efforts to preserve themselves in office. We should expect these efforts to be strenuous. Direct and indirect appears of the Administration's determination to seek these resignations likely will be directed at: various White House offices, includiong the Office of the Counsel to the President and the Office of Political Affairs; Attorney General Gonzales and DOJ Chief of Staff Sampson; Deputy Attorney General McNulty and ODAG staffers Moschella and Elston; Acting Associate AG Bill Mercer; EOUSA Director Mike Battle; and AGAC Chair Johnny Sutton. Recipients of such "appeals" must respond identically:

* What? U.S. Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President (there is no right, nor should there be any expectation, that U.S. Attorneys would be entitled to serve beyond their four-year term).
* Who decided? The Administration made the determination to seek the resignations (not any specific person at the White House or the Department of Justice).
* Why me? The Administration is grateful for your service, but wants to give someone else the chance to serve in your district.
* I need more time! The decision is to have a new Acting or Interim U.S. Attorney in place by January 31, 2007 (granting "extensions" will hinder the process of getting a new U.S. Attorney in place and giving that person the opportunity to serve for a full two years).

STEP 4

Evaluation and Selection of "Interim" Candidates: During December 2006-January 2007, the Department of Justice, in consultation with the Office of the Counsel to the President, evaluates and selects candidates for Attorney General-appointment (or candidates who may become Acting U.S. Attorney by operation of law) to serve upon the resignation of above-listed U.S. Attorneys.



STEP 5

Selection, Nomination, and Appointment of New U.S. Attorneys: Beginning as soon as possible in November 2006, Office of the Counsel to the President and Department of Justice carry out (on an expedited basis) the regular U.S. Attorney appointment process: obtain recommendations from Senators/Bush political leads and other sources; evaluate candidates; make recommendations to the President; conduct background investigations; have President make nominations and work to secure confirmations of U.S. Attorney nominees.





Mercer, William W
From: Sampson, Kyle
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:06 PM
To: Mercer, William W
Subject: RE: Heads up

All Senators have been notified and are fine/no objections.
All USAs have been notified, except Iglesias and Chiara (Battle has left messages for them).
Who is calling you? Charlton? McKay?


---------Original Message----------
From: Mercer, William W
Sent: thursday, December 07, 2006 1:58 PM
To: Sampson, Kyle
Subject: Re: Heads up

I have what I assume is my first call. Before I respond, do you have a status report?

---------Original Message----------
From: Sampson, Kyle
To: Mercer, William W
Sent: Tue Dec 05 22:50:48 2006
Subject Heads up

Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader -- like across the board -- plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for the details.

<<USA replacement plan.doc>>





Mercer, William W
From: Mercer, William W
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:41 PM
To: Sampson, Kyle
Subject: Re: Heads up

Charlton

---------Original Message----------
From: Sampson, Kyle
To: Mercer, William W
Sent: Thu Dec 07 15:05:31 2006
Subject: RE: Heads up

All Senators have been notified and are fine/no objections.
All USAs have been notified, except Iglesias and Chiara (Battle has left messages for them).
Who is calling you? Charlton? McKay?

---------Original Message----------
From: Mercer, William W
Sent: thursday, December 07, 2006 1:58 PM
To: Sampson, Kyle
Subject: Re: Heads up

I have what I assume is my first call. Before I respond, do you have a status report?

---------Original Message----------
From: Sampson, Kyle
To: Mercer, William W
Sent: Tue Dec 05 22:50:48 2006
Subject Heads up

Administration has determined to ask some underperforming USAs to move on (you'll remember I beat back a much broader -- like across the board -- plan that WHCO was pushing after 2004). Calls will go out on Thursday. Wanted you to know in case you get some calls from the field and so you can help manage the chatter that may result. See the attached for the details.

<<USA replacement plan.doc>>




From: Sampson, Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:25 PM
To: Battle, Michael (USAEO)
Cc: McNulty, Paul J; Elston, Michael (ODAG); Moschella, William; Mercer, William W; Gooding, Monica; Sutton Johnny K. (USATXW)
Subject: USA replacements

Mike, Bill Kelley called to report that they are weathering two main complaints: In making the calls, Battle (1) wasn't clear whether the USAs in question would be permitted to resign, or instead were being fired; and (2) was too abrupt. Bill seemed nonplussed by the complaints, but nevertheless passed them on to me.

Perhaps a second round of calls from you, Mike, to the relevant USAs is in order? Talkers would be something like:

* I wanted to be sure you understood that DOJ intends not to say anything about your leaving, but instead allow you to announce your resignation and the reasons for it.
* We want to work with you over the next six weeks to ensure a smooth transition; and
* It's in our interest for you to land on your feet and maintain our good relations with the Department — how can I help?

Perhaps this is a bad idea? Thoughts?

Kyle Sampson
Chief of Staff
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-2001 wk.
(202) 305-5289 cell
kyle.sampson@usdoj.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Applause. Fabulous find
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Incredible. k&r (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sunday morning kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. They were planning this as thoroughly as
the war plan for the Persian Gulf war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Shut down everything
so the Dems can't investigate and so all the criminal cases against Rethugs would not thwart plans to steal 2008 . They were caught stealing the cookies AGAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. lots of talk on Sun shows today--but no dots to Elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Amazing they put in all in writing
But I expect they figured they were doing nothing wrong. Those USAs were endangering GOPers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC