Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:44 PM
Original message |
OK. Someone explain it to me: Stimulus |
|
I get the money going to infrastructure, and programs. I don't understand the tax rebate. How is it working? Are we getting checks, or more money in our paychecks, or is it only money for unemployment?
I'm sorry, but when it comes to tax stuff it usually leaves me :crazy:
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. more money in our paychecks |
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. that's what I thought too |
|
but I'm also wondering how much a week, or what the percentage it is going to be per week so I can figure it out.
|
Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. I believe the figure is now $400. per person per year |
|
I don't know how many checks you get a year but divide that number by four hundred dollars Or eight hundred if married and you will know how much extra per check you will receive..Obama wanted five hundred per person but had to settle for less to get Republican support.
|
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. that's less than 20 dollars a week. |
TWiley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. That is why republican tax cuts generally do not work |
|
They are so small that they are ineffective. $20 bucks a week at least is reoccuring, the single check the bushtapo issued was a real waste of money and time.
I doubt enough tax could be cut to do any good as there comes a point where nothing will work anymore. No school bussing, no snow plowing, no mail delivery, no police, no fire and so on.
The republicans are truly retards. They can only say one thing ..... TAX CUT. What if a football team only had one play?
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. and, if I understand correctly, Joe the Plumber would have his child support back |
|
payments deducted from that, too ... so he'd bitch about Obama's stimulus taking money out of his pocket again ... (mind you, his kids might be a bit pissed that they're not getting their child support payments ...)
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. And if you don't have a paycheck? You GET NOTHING AND LIKE IT! |
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. if you're on unemployment, as I understand it |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-11-09 04:51 PM by Maine-ah
there's an extra 25 per week, with the average UC being 300 a week that would be 325 a week. I don't know what the plans are for the unemployed and not getting an unemployment check.
Hope you can find something to tide you over. :hug:
edited to finish a sentence...duh.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. Depends on why you aren't getting a paycheck. |
|
If one is collecting unemployment, they will get an increase. If one is self employed, the tax table will be reduced for them as well, and they can reduce they estimated quarterly payments. If one is a senior, then there is a break in reference to 401Ks. You do not have to withdraw your 401K, and if you do, you will only be taxed on the forced amount....I believe. If you don't pay income tax, although you work, your EIC payment (if you have opt to get this payment including into your check will increase). If you don't work and have never have worked, then yeah.....you don't get a tax break, unless you are married, and your spouse works.
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. You get the possibility of getting a job from the infrastructure projects. |
|
And yes, you should like that.
|
hamsterjill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Do we know for sure that this stayed in the plan? |
Myrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
17. ... so unemployed people, who could use it most, get ZILCH |
|
... because if you have nothing coming in, there's no 'taxes' to 'rebate'.
:spank: Leave it to the GOP to fuck America again.
|
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. If you read up-thread.. |
|
you will find some comments to correct your perception.
|
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It's one of the things the thugs managed to make cuts on. |
|
wouldn't want us getting to much of a payroll tax reduction. Sort of the same way the pubs don't want to repeal the amt cause they know where going to need it.
|
Bolo Boffin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The payroll tax decrease does support jobs as well, theoretically |
|
Because what comes out of your check is matched by your employer. You paying less means they pay less. Paying less taxes helps employers either save money or hire another person. So there is a possible gain of jobs in a payroll tax cut.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It's my understanding that people making $75K or above will again receive no tax break. That's $150K |
jmg257
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Well, that sucks - again. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |