Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More disgusting news about Mexico and NAFTA.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:23 PM
Original message
More disgusting news about Mexico and NAFTA.
While NAFTA has cost us dearly with job losses, downward wage pressures, and increased social costs, Mexico's fragile economy has been wrecked by this fake free trade agreement. Thanks to CAFTA, expect similar statistics from Central America in the coming years.


http://tradealert.us/news_item.asp?NID=2550032

Free trade agreements spur immigration
By Gina-Marie Cheeseman
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Mar 15, 2007, 01:14

NAFTA is an acronym that should be mentioned every time the corporate media reports on the illegal immigration issue. It stands for the North American Free Trade Agreement, which established a free-trade zone in North America. Signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1992, it took effect on January 1, 1994, but immediately lifted tariffs on the majority of goods produced by the three participating nations, and called for the gradual elimination of most trade barriers over a 15-year period.

Touted as a means to lift Mexico out of poverty, NAFTA has actually driven it further into poverty. According to the Economic Policy Institute’s 2001 report, “Mexican wages have decreased 27 percent since NAFTA, while hourly income from labor is down 40 percent.” Free trade did not benefit the Mexican economy because by definition free market trade includes privatization, which in turn eliminates state subsidies and controls, and almost never includes redistribtion.

The 2001report by the Economic Policy Institute also found that when Mexico began NAFTA negotiations it had “noncompetitive production costs . . . due to higher prices for inputs such as diesel and electricity, higher financial costs, and higher marketing costs (due to deficient infrastructure in highways and warehouse storage . . . among other factors).”

John Warnock, economist and author of The Other Mexico: The North America Triangle Completed, defines free trade as being “about private investment rights.” Warnock cited a World Bank Report from March 2006 where it is mentioned that the poorest 10 percent of the population earns only 1.5 percent of the total Mexican income, but the richest 10 percent earn 42.8 percent. “The distribution of wealth, which would be very hard to measure, is believed to be much worse.” The March report by the World Bank also claimed that since NAFTA the number of Mexican people that live below the poverty line is “62 percent of the economically active population.” The minimum wage has fallen by 40.7 percent. The Mexican government sets the poverty line at two daily minimum wages for a family with five members, or 80 pesos, about seven dollars.

A startling statistic comes from the Mexican government. Between 1993 and 2000 the disparity between Mexican and American manufacturing wages has increased from $9.6 to $12.1 per hour. Reports by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) state that wages in Mexico have dropped by 10 percent since 1995 while labor production increased by 45 percent. Work hours have increased from eight to 12 hours a day during the same time period. The number of people working more than 48 hours per week has increased since 1988 from 2.3 million to 9.3 million.

<snip>

Please read the entire article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Chomsky
did a good job describing the real reason for NAFTA. It was really a twofer for US imperialism. not only did it provide us with cheap labor, NAFTA also locked Mexico into a right wing corporatist economic policy. They cannot increase social spending or change trade policy or the banks will cut off their loans and send them into a downward spiral. it was meant to block any chance for a social revolution in mexico. Thank Clinton for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sad isn't it?
Clinton, Gore, Richardson, Foley, Matsui, and so many other dems participated in this grand corporate scheme. I can't count the times I wanted to throw something at the TV during those debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Go Big Dawg!
Part of the 'free' trade legacy of Bill Clinton. I can't wait to see what the Mrs. has in store for us when she's in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC