Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Mormons Posthumously Baptize Hitler, Dracula, Ted Bundy and Others?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:23 PM
Original message
Did Mormons Posthumously Baptize Hitler, Dracula, Ted Bundy and Others?
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/03/03/did-mormons-posthumously-baptize-hitler-dracula-ted-bundy/

Did Mormons Posthumously Baptize Hitler, Dracula, Ted Bundy and Others?
Jon Ponder | Mar. 3, 2009
When the leadership of the Mormon Church ordered its followers to donate $20 million to the Proposition 8 hate campaign in California last year — instead of, say, giving the money to feed the hungry or house the homeless — the leaders also invited unwanted scrutiny of the church’s bizarre practices and beliefs.

One of the strangest of these is the practice of “saving” dead people through posthumous baptism, which they call “proxy rites.” According to this belief, the dead are not automatically saved. Instead, the rites give them the option to choose salvation in the afterlife.

In a letter to the Salt Lake City CityWeekly last week, local resident Helen Radkey claimed that the list of famous people who have received these rites includes dictators and their henchmen like Adolf Hitler, Martin Bormann, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin and Mao Tse-Tung; pirates like Blackbeard and Jean and Pierre Lafitte; and gangsters like Al Capone, Bonnie and Clyde and Benjamin “Bugsy” Seigel, who was, of course, Jewish.

Also on the list, according to Radkey, are two infamous serial killers, Vlad the Impaler, whose exploits were fictionalized in the Dracula story, and the only known Mormon serial killer, Ted Bundy.

Bundy raped and killed as many as 100 women on a cross-country crime spree from 1974 to 1978. He became a Mormon around 1974, while he was attending law school at the University of Utah. It’s unclear whether he was excommunicated before or after he was executed in Florida, in 1989, but Radkey says the list of those given posthumous rites includes Theodore Robert Cowell, the name given Bundy when he was born on Nov. 24, 1946, in Burlington, Vt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vlad the Impaler?
That's just plain weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mao and Bugsy are the only ones there who were not baptized.
The rest, of course, were already recipients of the Sacrament of Baptism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I don't think Mormons count Baptism unless they do it

by their formula, which is not the standard one. Otherwise they wouldn't want to baptize dead people who had their own religions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
51. Mormons have a huge library, now computerized, of obituaries and
routinely baptize everyone, including your relatives and mine, after death.
They don't bother to ask permission, nor do they care about anyone's religious preferences or lack therof.

If you read about the details and beliefs of the Mormon religion, you may be surprised.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the good laugh. Aren't religions fun ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Crazy religious folks sure have a fascination with the unborn and the dead
Meanwhile the living can go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, forget all the good people in the world that aren't "saved", "Save" the famous evil people.(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Is the Mormon practice of baptizing the dead the same as the "saving" that evangelicals do?
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 09:45 PM by Fridays Child
Would any Mormons, or students of the practice, care to enlighten us?

In any case, for whatever reason they do it, it has the side effect/benefit of generating lots of genealogy records that the church makes available to all, Mormon and non-Mormon alike. And, while I would never rely on their records as the sole source of genealogical data, they often provide good starting points for research or confirmation for information found elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. From what I know (and so fwiw)
they only "baptize" their direct ancestors, so I doubt they baptized Hitler or Mao.

dg

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Here is a link that explains more or less why we do what we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Any "ancestor" can be "saved" by the Mormons
I don't really understand it but some people I know that are into genealogy were upset that their records were used to retroactively do whatever weird rites the Mormons do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I'm glad they do that
makes my job easier, since they research the heck out of those records.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. But the Mormon records are reportedly inaccurate
They take whatever has been submitted without requiring sources or verification. Pretty much anything is accepted to add to their ancestor lists. OTOH, their free Personal Ancestry File software (http://www.familysearch.org/eng/paf/) is pretty good for the price. ;) But it is set up to make it easy to upload the records to the LDS site.

I need to get back into my families' geneaology while my Mom is still around so I can get all the stuff she has collected over the years. People now tell me the best internet site for researching is Ancestry.com though the fee is steep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yeah, Ancestry is expensive
but worth it.

They have a really cool "find famous relatives" button...found out that (if the records are correct) that I am a direct descendant of Thomas More.....I guess that means I have to go read "Utopia." :( :rofl: And I think my dad would have gotten a hoot to find out that he was a distant cousin of Mark Twain, his favorite author.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Cool - how are they on the centuries old stuff in England and Wales?
My grandmother and mother exhausted most of our ancestors on this continent but did little on the people before they came to the US. A few families have family histories going back far beyond that but the ordinary people were harder to find back when they were researching in the 30s to the 60s.

One family may go back to Sir Francis Drake's brother, but we don't have hard proof of that one. Another branch goes back to William the Conqueror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I haven't had to delve into those
so I don't know how extensive those archives are, but they do have them. :)

Hey, Cousin! The branch through Thomas More extends to Bill the C too! :hi:

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Cool about the Thomas More connection!
If I get around to getting back into geneaology I will let you know how Ancestry.com is on the really old stuff. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Great!
Every now & then they have a "try us out for 2 weeks free" thing, so give it a whirl if you can. :hi:

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SurfinBetty Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's weird but I support their right to do it.
This is America, isn't it? Freedom of religion, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. you get no points for killing the strawman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SurfinBetty Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I wasn't aware it was a contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Freedom of religion IS what it's about ... not hoisting your beliefs on dead people
I speak from experience with this and mormons. My mother was not a mormon but her sister was. When my mother died my aunt arranged for a MORMON service, a MORMON preacher, and MORMON mourners! My mother didn't need any bused in mourners, but there they were all the same. My mother's children were furious with the arrangements that had been made and knew that my aunt had also arranged for her name to be added to the big list in the vaults under the desert. She would have taken over my brothers funeral in the same way if we had not barred her from even attending due to her behavior at my mother's passing.

Yes, she thought she had a right to "baptize" my mother after she died because my mother would NEVER of participated in that were she alive.

Yes, freedom of religion is what it's about and no one has a right to force it on someone, even after their death. If they were going to join that religion, they had ample opportunity to do so while they were alive, they don't need anybody forcing them to be members after they are dead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SurfinBetty Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Just think about that for a while.
Maybe something will come to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Can one force the deceased to do anything? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Um so let the dead sue them if they're upset about it
I have a super-duper Catholic cousin who insisted on sprinkling holy water on my dad's remains, and my dad was not Catholic. Unlike your aunt, however, he didn't make a big scene of it & it was no BFD. Your aunt's behavior at your mom's funeral was inexcusable, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Do you really think the dead people care?
You care and you're obviously upset because of what your aunt did at your mother's funeral, and I appreciate that. But what does that have to do with the dead?

IF someone's ancestor should be aware that someone baptised after their death, then I suspect they're in a pretty good position to say 'no thanks' when offered their chance to get into Mormon heaven - or laugh about it.

This is about the living, not the dead. The Mormons' do it because they are encouraged to do it by their church, just like evangelicals are encouraged to proselytize to strangers.

Some non-Mormons get upset by the practice, in the same way that non-evangelicals get upset when the proselytizers come knocking on Saturday morning.

I really, really don't think it bothers the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. The recipients of baptisms for the dead are dead.
If there is no after life than we are the greatest fools in the world. If not, then Mormon doctrine states that the deceased have the right to reject the baptism and it is of no effect. No one is forced to become a Mormon in the afterlife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
52. You are free to believe anything you want, no matter how laughable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, they did.
And didn't they also hold a ceremony to 'symbolically' baptize all non-living Jews?

This is our enemy, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Baptisms for the dead are performed one at a time.
You cannot symbolically baptize all non-living members of any religious group. For starters it would require several million people standing as proxy for the dead. As there are no temples with baptismal fonts of sufficient size for such an activity, your claim is preposterous. Have deceased Jews had proxy baptisms performed for them, yes. If you look at some of the posts noted above, assuming there is an afterlife, Mormon doctrine states that the deceased have the right to accept or reject the ordinances done in their name. If there is no afterlife, then this is an academic argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. They probably baptized Ted Bundy because he was such a good Republican.
They'll be wanting him to run for office in "Heaven".

I guess they liked the "racial purity" ideology of Hitler.

I can't imagine why anyone would want to proxy-baptize Vlad. Maybe a Mormon high leader is his great, great, great, great grandson or nephew or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. They needed to baptize Dracula because nobody else wanted to be a missionary to Transylvania
So what if he's a vampire? As long as he's got the holy long johns under the cape, its all cool with Elohim, our Heavenly Father!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Oh, that's gooood! LOL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes and don't forget:


They have to get to everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. They better do me too, when I'm gone
cuz I'm gonna need all the help I can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
53. Are you planning on becoming a mass murderer or arch criminal? Famous evil may be a key qualifier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Religions and there damn forgiveness...SCREW THEM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. What's worse is they baptized me.
Edited on Fri Mar-06-09 12:07 AM by leftofthedial
A friend and former co-worker--good guy--did whatever it is they do to add me to the rolls of the cleansed.

I don't know if there is enough whiskey and depravity in the world to overcome that, but I'm trying. I'm trying like hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Someone broke some rules to make that happen.
The Mormon church will not baptize a living person by proxy unless they have personally requested it, and even then it takes A LOT of red tape to make that happen. Including repeated interviews with Mormon church officials.

I know of a woman who was married to a Mormon man all her life but never joined. She was in the nursing home after her husband died and told one of her kids she was ready to be baptized, but getting her to the local ward building was impossible. It took no less than 5 interviews at 4 different levels of the Mormon church leadership in order to get her baptism by proxy approved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Were you actually baptized?
Unless you actually went through the ordinance, You aren't baptized. We don't do proxy baptisms for the living. Did he put you on the temple roll? That's a whole different matter, the temple roll is a list of people who are going through difficulty who are being prayed for. People are only on that list for 2-week intervals. If he did so without getting your permission, he made a serious mistake. That said, you are on no church records as a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. whatever it is they do for "lost souls"
is what they did.

I don't try to keep their sacraments straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. You would have noticed, we baptize by immersion, so if you didn't get dunked, you're not a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I never thought I was a member.
Well, I'm a dick, but not a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. LOL.
Seriously though, if you were not immersed, and then confirmed (another ceremony done afterwards) you are not on the church rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Thank god.
I mean, non-god.

You know what I mean.

I hope I can still keep drinking whiskey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Yep.
But I'd wait until happy hour, the only thing worse than a hangover is paying too much for it. :cheers:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have better things to worry about.
If the Mormons want to wave their dead chickens over my corpse after I die, why should I care? I'd be dead anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. Oh the Irony of it all.
So I suppose there's really no such thing as hell...for those that deserve to be there.

Mormons have been caught several times conducting baptism for the dead on behalf of holocaust victims. They had promised some of the Jewish leadership they would stop...but then a couple of years later resumed.

So here's the irony. According the the Mormons then, it would appear that those holocaust victims will be able spend eternity with Adolph. Then there's Bundy's victims spending eternity with...well you get the picture. Isn't that just so special? 300 billions years...and eternity hasn't evn started. 700 million billions years..and yep, they are still not done buddying up to these lovely specimens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Funny you should mention Mormon Hell, because it is a relative thing.
The reality is though, that Hitler would have had to undergo a repentance process in the afterlife to be able to even be in a position to take advantage of a proxy baptism. Being that we believe that repentance is far more difficult in the afterlife than it is here on Earth, and that Murder is one of the most serious sins one can commit, and that Mr. Hitler is clearly guilty of the murder of millions, if a proxy baptism was done for him (and I would seriously consider the source of this report before believing it) it was a mere formality, as is done for everyone, so that the opportunity, if not the reality of salvation is open to all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. According to Mormon Doctrine, the spirits of the deceased must all recieve the opportunity
To accept the Gospel, and hence it is our duty to offer that opportunity to everyone via proxy baptism. The dead may choose to accept or reject it as they wish. They will still have to answer for their sins, and depending on the life they lived in mortality (Hitler, etc...) they will be more or less likely to accept such an ordinance. As to Bundy, having been excommunicated prior to execution, I somewhat doubt his having vicarious work done for him. Anyway, who is Ms. Radkey anyway, and how does she claim to know this? I'd be fascinated to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
49. Trick question. Dracula is undead. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illuminaughty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. I thought you were going to reference "Religulous"
Just saw it tonight with friends and we were howling at the section on Mormons. And yes, they brought this very thing up. People here are always refering to the "magic underwear" and I finally got to see what that was all about. I'm still hurting from laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC