Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Massachusetts: Galvin: No foreclosures -- Plan will ask to give homeowners day in court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:14 PM
Original message
Massachusetts: Galvin: No foreclosures -- Plan will ask to give homeowners day in court
With a growing number of Massachusetts homeowners facing the prospect of losing everything, Secretary of State William Galvin today will call for an immediate halt to all foreclosures in the state.

Galvin said he will propose a sweeping revamp of the state’s foreclosure process while at a State House hearing on measures to crack down on predatory lending.

---
Galvin contends the current set of proposals now being discussed on Beacon Hill - including a $10 million bailout fund for distressed homeowners and the licensing of loan officers - aren’t adequate to deal with a record surge in foreclosures. Nearly 20,000 homeowners across the state faced foreclosure proceedings last year.

“We need to move in with emergency legislation,” Galvin said. “You are literally talking about tens of thousands of people in this state who I would call the pre-homeless.”

---eoe---

http://business.bostonherald.com/realestateNews/view.bg?articleid=191079
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm wondering whether the courts will invalidate provisions of the mortgage
contract they find unconscionable, that is, so unreasonable that they must be unreasonable, such as the adjustable rate that makes it impossible to continue to pay the mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This is good press but going to be very hard in practice for existing loans.
How do you separate sub prime loans from standard ones. Are all ARMs going to be included. How do you weed out homeowner fraud? Sometimes the buyer wants just that kind of loan since they are planning on flipping. Its not always clear cut.

What it comes down to is that if there is a contract, voluntarily signed by competent adults, legal at the time with all required disclosures, its going to be hard to for the court to legitimately set all or part aside.

The cynic in me sees a situation where the pols are doing cosmetic stuff in the press ($10M is a drop in the bucket for housing in MA) and hoping the economy and the courts will bail them out.

Sorry I can't be more positive on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's good to see action on this problem.
http://www.affil.org/

Americans for Fairness in Lending Calls on Regulators to Step Up and Rein In Rogue Practices in Subprime Mortgage Lending Industry

( March 23, 2007) Kirsten Keefe, Executive Director of Americans for Fairness in Lending (AFFIL), released the following statement in response to the crisis in subprime mortgage lending:

“Regulators can turn this crisis into an opportunity by reining in rogue practices in the subprime mortgage lending industry. The inherent design flaws in the subprime mortgages can and must be changed. Foreclosures not only have a devastating impact on families, they impact communities, lower property rates, affect tax bases, and prohibit asset-building. Predatory practices need to end immediately and solutions must be designed to help the millions of distressed Americans who have mortgages they cannot afford and are forced to sacrifice basic necessities to pay profits to lenders. Read Full Release...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Funny
I totally support this. In Michigan, Workers World Party has been showing up at public town hall meetings with Granholm and asking her why she won't do this in Michigan..foreclosures haven't been this bad here since the depression. I sent this over to them. I hope they can embarrass her into doing it. She is really starting to get hassled about it and I am dissapointed she hasn't. She is such a panderer to big business sometimes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Elizabeth Warren, Harvard law professor,
said the mood in Washington is changing.

She's involved with Affil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashlighter Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sigh, This is stupid. Did these people NOT sign the contract??
Everyone talks about how these people are being "victimized" by the lending industry. Five years ago, anyone who had taken Econ 101 would have told you that taking out a $500,000 Adjustable Rate Mortgage on the one bedroom in Southie was a foolish choice.


Are we legislating to protect people against stupid decisions now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC