March 06, 2009
Siegelman ruling and update...First, if you are new to the US Attorney scandal as it specifically relates to the alleged political prosecutions of American citizens seen as enemies of the WH (Rovegate), I urge you to read the links I provide at the end first and then come back to this entry.
##
Before you read the bad news - and it is bad news - remember that none of the evidence that was uncovered after the Siegelman trial was allowed to be part of this appeal. So what we know of Karl Rove's alleged involvement and his friendship with Billy Canary and Canary's wife - the US Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, Leura Canary - was not allowed as part of this appeal. And the Rove-Canary angle is just one example in a case surrounded by serious problems and questions. On the Rove-Canary issue alone there is enough to overturn on appeal. If other issues -for example, such as the issue of the 60 Minutes find that the key witness in the case, Nick Bailey, had been coached by the prosecution and forced to write out his testimony 72 times- are added in, this case would have been entirely dismissed and Siegelman entirely set free.
So what the 11th Circuit ruled on is essentially what was in the indictment and Judge Fuller's instructions to the jury - but they did not consider any of the now well documented facts that have created such an uproar and which have implicated Karl Rove and his pals in this saga. They did not consider, for example, the jury tampering that we now know had taken place, nor the witness intimidation and coaching coaching we now know about, nor the fact that Leura Canary did not recuse herself, etc. In other words, they considered nothing of what we now know about as the reality of this case. Even still, they struck down 2 of the 7 charges against Siegelman. So that should tell you something.
-snip-
Okay, now let's also recall something very important to both this case and that of Paul Minor. In Alabama, the former Attorney General who sealed the ballots during the 2002 election, not allowing Siegelman to get his rightful recount, was William Pryor. Within several months of his sealing the ballots, he was appointed on a recess appointment to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (the same court that just ruled on this case). Although Pryor was not part of the 3 judge panel reviewing this case, his recess appointment into a position of such authority raises questions about other judges. It should also be noted that Pryor was a former client of Karl Rove.
More @
http://www.atlargely.com/2009/03/siegelman-ruling-and-update.html