Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'If We Want To Save The Planet, We Need a Five-Year Freeze on Biofuels.' Very Important read.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:53 PM
Original message
'If We Want To Save The Planet, We Need a Five-Year Freeze on Biofuels.' Very Important read.
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 01:54 PM by chaska
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/03/27/109/

Looks like we are about to let the powers-that-be screw us up real bad. Anybody notice how everybody (investors, anyway) is jumping on the ethanol band wagon lately. It gets much worse. Read on.



It used to be a matter of good intentions gone awry. Now it is plain fraud. The governments using biofuel to tackle global warming know that it causes more harm than good. But they plough on regardless.

snip

So what’s wrong with these programmes? Only that they are a formula for environmental and humanitarian disaster. In 2004 I warned, on these pages, that biofuels would set up a competition for food between cars and people. The people would necessarily lose: those who can afford to drive are richer than those who are in danger of starvation. It would also lead to the destruction of rainforests and other important habitats. I received more abuse than I’ve had for any other column - except for when I attacked the 9/11 conspiracists. I was told my claims were ridiculous, laughable, impossible. Well in one respect I was wrong. I thought these effects wouldn’t materialise for many years. They are happening already.

snip

Already we know that biofuel is worse for the planet than petroleum. The UN has just published a report suggesting that 98% of the natural rainforest in Indonesia will be degraded or gone by 2022. Just five years ago, the same agencies predicted that this wouldn’t happen until 2032. But they reckoned without the planting of palm oil to turn into biodiesel for the European market. This is now the main cause of deforestation there and it is likely soon to become responsible for the extinction of the orang-utan in the wild.

But it gets worse. As the forests are burned, both the trees and the peat they sit on are turned into carbon dioxide. A report by the Dutch consultancy Delft Hydraulics shows that every tonne of palm oil results in 33 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, or 10 times as much as petroleum produces. I feel I need to say that again. Biodiesel from palm oil causes 10 times as much climate change as ordinary diesel.

There are similar impacts all over the world. Sugarcane producers are moving into rare scrubland habitats (the cerrado) in Brazil, and soya farmers are ripping up the Amazon rainforests. As President Bush has just signed a biofuel agreement with President Lula, it’s likely to become a lot worse. Indigenous people in South America, Asia and Africa are starting to complain about incursions onto their land by fuel planters. A petition launched by a group called biofuelwatch, begging western governments to stop, has been signed by campaigners from 250 groups.

The British government is well aware that there’s a problem. On his blog last year the environment secretary David Miliband noted that palm oil plantations “are destroying 0.7% of the Malaysian rainforest each year, reducing a vital natural resource (and in the process, destroying the natural habitat of the orang-utan). It is all connected.” Unlike government policy.

You can join the campaign at www.biofuelwatch.org.uk. www.monbiot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, guess what. I struck a blow for the earth by removing a private street light....
It was costing me $8 a month and I hated the damn thing anyway.

I feel good about it. Bring back the night, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Biodeisel made from used cooking oil
causes what environmental damage, exactly?

Don't lump all biofuels together. Ethanol is a scam, I think we agree on that. But it would make zero sense to freeze production of biofuels from "used" sources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Biodiesel from cooking oil at a certain level of commercialization...
MAY become economically unworkable. As demand increases suddenly "free" used cooking oil is no longer free. Restaurants could start charging for it. But that day is a long way off.

It's not a bad idea at all though, especially for small time operators. It still produces carbon dioxide, unfortunately, but it's a whole lot better than doing nothing.

What we really have to be concerned about is cutting down the rain forests to plant biofuels, which is the main point of the article.

Boycott palm oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'd love to see the subject of the OP changed to
something that includes "boycott palm oil"

nearly every processed baked good in America contains palm oil, which only contributes to this problem.

Thanks for such an informative post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, it's too late. Can't edit now. How about this: BOYCOTT PALM OIL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. How many of our Grannies used palm oil when they baked?
or how many of the "family" bakeries did?

I would guess NONE.

It's the conglomeratization of every stinking facet of our lives that is doing us all in..

As a society, we value shelf-life & ease of preparation over everything else...even our health and tenure on the planet.

And our selfishness & greed is killing every other living thing on the planet...creatures & plants we have never even seen are dying because their habitat is being commoditized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I still hold out some hope of using algae
for mass-production of biodiesel. I agree that leveling rainforest for the sake of palm production is an unsustainable, unwise practice. It's very comparable to growing corn for ethanol - kinda dumb.

I don't see restaurants charging for their used oil, though. Most of them still pay the renderer to come by weekly and take their used grease away, and see it as a major boon when some enterprising biodiesel producer offers to take it off their hands for free. If at some point in the future they decide they want to charge for it, they can always be removed from the biodiesel maker's pick-up list and referred right back to their old renderer. ;-)

Biodiesel from trash should also prove more sustainable than biodiesel from fresh crops. The thermal depolymerization process will continue to improve over the years, and trash is not going to be in short supply for a long, long time. True, this is not a 100% solution to fuel scarcity, but it is progress.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. PLEASE KICK. I have to leave now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. HEMP FOR VICTORY!
And we should be looking at biomass and biomethane, much cleaner than biodiesel, don't have to use corn, in fact organic waste, animal waste and lawn waste that would other wise go into landfills can be used. The know-how has been out there for 30 years (I researched this subject for a debate team in the late 70's) and was kicked aside by the Reagan admin. We also need to boost public transit and make it socially unacceptable (if it doesn't become prohibitively expensive anyways)to drive inefficient vehicles for anything other than specific tasks. Ethanol is just an ADM/Monsanto shuck, and we need to get control of this arguement NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hun Joro Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Uh, oh....
It so happens our author (Alice Friedemann) has been a main factor in sinking the technofix illusion of hydrogen. Alice Friedemann's next report is on biofuels, and it ought to accomplish the same thing.

snip

Alice Friedemann has completed her new report on biofuels, and it will be in Culture Change soon. The report is based on her 6 years of studying biofuels and 3 years studying soil sciences. In seven parts, it has among its highlights (1) a muckraking section on why soil scientists aren't speaking out on the harm done to soil by harvesting crop residues for cellulosic ethanol; (2) a fresh way of looking at the EROEI (energy efficiency) of ethanol, and (3) it covers challenges with cellulosic ethanol from farm to fuel tank, reported nowhere else. - JL, March 26, 2007

http://culturechange.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=105&Itemid=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC