Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vermont's largest newspaper (a Gannett paper at that) strongly endorses same sex marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:55 AM
Original message
Vermont's largest newspaper (a Gannett paper at that) strongly endorses same sex marriage
This is a great editorial, even if it does come from the corporate media. And Vermont business groups and most religious leaders have also strongly endorsed the same sex marriage legislation currently under consideration in the legislature.

EDITORIAL: The time has come for marriage equality
March 17, 2009

With legislative leaders set to take up a bill that would grant same-sex couples the full legal right to marry, the time has come for Vermont to move forward with this important piece of civil rights legislation when it comes before the Legislature. We should no longer deny that which is offered to a selected portion of the population.

Gov. Jim Douglas would do much to bring Vermonters together on this still controversial matter by signing such a bill into law if and when it is presented to him. If he opposes the concept of same-sex marriage, he must articulate his reasons beyond saying it is unnecessary with our civil union law and that he wants to avoid a divisive issue.

In an April 1999 editorial, the Free Press editorial board wrongly warned Vermonters against gay marriage. The years since then have proven our position to be unfounded.

Ten years ago, as the case that would eventually lead to Vermont adopting civil unions was making its way through the courts, we argued that our laws discriminate when a valid reason is found to do so, giving the 21-year drinking age as an example. We also argued that marriage was not a right.


Our state Supreme Court saw things differently, saying that the state must provide at least the legal equivalent of marriage to same-sex couples. The ruling gave birth to the first-in-the-nation civil union law, a compromise that was best for the times.

In the 1999 editorial we spoke of the need to bridge the cultural divide to reach a consensus if we were to embark on such a major change to a fundamental social institution. We went so far as to warn that becoming the only state to allow same-sex marriage would make Vermont a target hostile to the idea, solemnly predicting, “there will be violence.” That prediction of course was pure nonsense.

<snip>

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090317/OPINION/90317043/1006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Us folks in Massachusetts can reliably tell Vermonters
that the sky has not fallen because of all the same-sex marriages that have happened here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3.  Vermonters already know this
After all, Vermont's SC decision paved the way for the MA decision, which came years after it. And Vermont will become the first state to enact marriage equality through through the legislative process rather than through a court mandate.

I think people forget, or never knew how truly revolutionary VT's court ruling was 10 years ago. And the majority of Vermonters support marriage equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know - I was very proud of our neighbor to the north when they legalized civil unions
What are the chances that marriage equality will make it past the governor's desk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. There's virtually no doubt that it will pass.
The question is will Doesless veto it, and will the legislature override the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. lovely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. it is lovely watching the support for marriage equality
that's being demonstrated by Vermonters. A far cry from what went down 10 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC