fumsm
(282 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 02:35 PM
Original message |
You know what else is cool....Chase +$50 bill... |
|
Bernie was stashing $50 bil in cash in Chase, and the bank never blinked an eye. Now if you were to stash $50 grand in the bank, they would turn your ass in. $50 fucking billion, and not a fucking word. How cool is that?
Why is no one talking about Chase and their part in the scandal?? I wonder????
|
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Because Chase is directly in league with Satan |
|
And if you question anything about them, they'll cause your livestock to go lame.
|
Waiting For Everyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Believe it or not, when a "money business" stashes MONEY in |
|
any bank, financial institution, or any where else, the recipican is happy. In all fairness, I don't see why they would have questioned him. You have to think BIG NUMBERS! Let's say I typically have a balance of $150,000 in my bank account. I come in and deposit a check for $20,000, nobody at the bank would blink. But if you (or someone else) maintains a balance of just over the $1,00 minumum to avoid charges did the same thing, all kind of bells would be ringing. Businesses like Bernie's deal in millions all the time. Why would anone question his transactions at any bank? The better question would be "Why didn't anyone notice that he never processed stock trades?"
|
fumsm
(282 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I guess a billion ain't what it used to be.. |
Gin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. if they have all of that...wouldn't that pay his victims off? |
Waiting For Everyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Eliot Spitzer's account was questioned wasn't it? n/t |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-19-09 04:12 PM by Waiting For Everyman
|
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So, who's getting the money? His wife or his victims? n/t |
onethatcares
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-19-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I would guess that the victims would |
|
have to prove they gave bernie x amount of dollars at a particular time which would then be parlayed into someone else that gave bernie a particular amount of dollars at a time to keep up appearances. So, the bottom line is: The victims will get nothing but a low budget tax write off.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |