Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate FINALLY Confirms Holdren & Lubchenco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 12:26 PM
Original message
Senate FINALLY Confirms Holdren & Lubchenco
The Senate on Thursday confirmed two of President's Obama top science picks. John Holdren will serve as director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and Jane Lubchenco will be administrator at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Holdren will also hold the title of "assistant to the president" for science and technology.

There was no controversy over these appointments. Why did it take 2 months for Senate confirmation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, it was about time.
My thinking is that the Republicans are just being obstructionists by sitting on these appointments.

Bastards.

They just can't stand the idea that real scientists will once again be making policy.

Hrmph.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My dear CP
You are probably right.

I wonder which senator(s) caused the delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this! I had posted earlier about these noms being blocked ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the link.
I wonder ...

Could Senators Merde and Scheiss have sat on the appointments indefinitely, or was there a time limit?

How were they persuaded to get off the potty?

Will we ever know who these cowards are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why did it take two months?
I'd lay a dollar on "Republican pissiness."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good question.
No bet. The odds are in your favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. An NOAA pick would likely worry Republicans...
on issues of global warming, ocean dumping, and such. Maybe what science picks need to do to placate Republicans is go into the hearings all wild-eyed and decleare themselves young earth creationists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Holdren worries them more.
The boss at NOAA is important, but the president's science advisor is more important, because he will have direct access to the president. He doesn't have to go through anybody. The religious right is afraid to let the president be kept up to date on issues that scientists deem important.

BTW, young-earth creationism is no longer in fashion. The latest slogan in the war against science is "intelligent design".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC