Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The True MATH: Confirming Election Fraud 2000-2008 (TIA) - x

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:07 AM
Original message
The True MATH: Confirming Election Fraud 2000-2008 (TIA) - x
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 06:49 AM by tiptoe


The True MATH: Confirming Election Fraud 2000-2008 — TruthIsAll


...

2004 Final Pre-election Polls

The Kerry/Bush vote split of the difference (1335) in sample between the RV and LV subset (57.8–42.2%)
matched the 12:22am Preliminary National Exit Poll  'New Voter'  shares: 57–41–2%.


The 1769 difference — i.e. 5-poll RV samples (10310) exclusive their LV subsets (8541) — comprised 17.2% of the total (RV) sample.
In 2004, there were approximately 21.4 million newly registered and other new voters (i.e., 'DNV' 2000) — 17% of 125.7m votes cast.
Of the 21.4 million, approximately 13.8m (11% of 125.74) were first-time voters. Kerry won 55% of first-timers.
The average pre-election poll projected turnout of registered voters was 82.8% (117m of 142m registered).
The census reported an 88.5% voter turnout (125.7m of 142.1m registered).

 

 

 

Actual Poll (%)

 
0.75
0.25
Undecided Voters Allocated

   RV
1-Nov
31-Oct
31-Oct
31-Oct
30-Oct




   LV
1-Nov
31-Oct
31-Oct
31-Oct
30-Oct
Poll
CBS
Fox
Gallup
ABC
Pew

Total
Average

Poll
CBS
Fox
Gallup
ABC
Pew

Total
Average
Sample
1125
1400
1866
3511
2408

10310
2062

Sample
939
1200
1573
2904
1925

8541
1708
Kerry
46
48
48
48
46


47.2

Kerry
47
48
49
48
48


48
Bush
47
45
46
47
45


46

Bush
49
46
49
49
51


48.8
Spread
-1
3
2
1
1


1.2

Spread
-2
2
0
-1
-3


-0.8
 
Kerry
50.50
52.50
51.75
51.00
52.00


51.55

Kerry
49.25
51.75
49.75
49.50
48.00


49.65
Bush
48.50
46.50
47.25
48.00
47.00


47.45

Bush
49.75
47.25
49.25
49.50
51.00


49.35
Spread
2.0
6.0
4.5
3.0
5.0


4.1

Spread
-0.5
4.5
0.5
0.0
-3.0


0.3









Projected
Turnout
83.5%
85.7%
84.3%
82.7%
79.9%


82.8%
 

Pre-election Polls Final RV and LV Samples

 
Registered Voters (RV)
 
Likely Voters (LV subset)

 
CBS
Fox
Gallup
ABC
Pew

Total
 
Total
1047
1302
1754
3335
2192

9629
93.4%
Kerry
518
672
896
1685
1108

4878
47.3%
Bush
529
630
858
1650
1084

4751
46.1%
 
Total
901
1128
1542
2817
1906

8294
97.1%
Kerry
441
576
771
1394
924

4106
48.1%
Bush
460
552
771
1423
982

4188
49.0%
 

 
RV – LV [Less-Likely Voters]
 
"RV minus LV" Voters


CBS
Fox
Gallup
ABC
Pew

Total
Total
145
174
213
519
286

1335
Kerry
76
96
125
291
184

772
Bush
69
78
88
227
102

563
 
Kerry
52.6%
55.2%
58.8%
56.2%
64.3%

57.8%
Bush
47.4%
44.8%
41.2%
43.8%
35.7%

42.2%
Spread
 5.2%
10.3%
17.6%
12.4%
28.7%

15.6%
 
• If Final NEP weightings indicate a mathematically impossible number of
   returning voters, then simple logic dictates the weightings are impossible.
• Since impossible weightings were necessary to match to the official vote count,
   then the official vote count must also be impossible.
• Since the vote count is impossible, then all demographic category cross tabs
   must use incorrect weights and/or vote shares to match the count.

Polled Pre Vote: 10,310. 'RV-LV' sample: CBS + Gallup + ABC + FOX + Pew
 

Post-Election 12:22a Prelim NEP
57%
41%
 
Polled Exit Vote: 13,046. Shares = 3.4m Dem margin  (17% DNV == 21.4m)

Post-Election   1:25p  Final NEP
54%
45%
 
'Forced' to match the vote-count = Dem margin dis-count, 1.5m votes  12

 
NATIONAL EXIT POLL
...

Full article: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x512608






 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. "If Final NEP weightings indicate a mathematically impossible number of returning voters, ...
If Final NEP weightings indicate a mathematically impossible number of returning voters, then
simple logic dictates the weightings are impossible.

Since impossible weightings were necessary to match to the official vote count, then
the official vote count must also be impossible.

Since the vote count is impossible, then
all demographic category cross tabs must use incorrect weights and/or vote shares to match the count.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x512608


















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Late Votes: The Democratic late vote exceeded the Election Day share by 7% in each of the last ...
three elections.

Late Votes

2008
Election Day
Late
Total

2004
Election Day
Late
Total

2000
Election Day
Late
Total
Total
121.21
10.16
131.37

Total
116.7
5.6
122.3

Total
102.6
2.8
105.4
Obama
63.4
6.01
69.46

Kerry
56.4
2.6
59.0

Gore
49.5
1.5
51.00
McCain
56.1
3.81
59.94

Bush
59.8
2.2
62.0

Bush
49.3
1.2
50.46
Other
1.64
0.34
1.98

Other
0.40
0.80
1.20

Other
3.8
0.1
3.95
Obama
52.3%
59.2%
52.87%

Kerry
48.3%
46.9%
48.27%

Gore
48.2%
53.6%
48.38%
McCain
46.3%
37.5%
45.62%

Bush
51.3%
39.4%
50.73%

Bush
48.1%
42.9%
47.87%
Other
1.4%
3.3%
1.51%

Other
0.4%
13.7%
1.00%

Other
3.7%
3.5%
3.75%
 
Dem Margin
+  6.0
+21.7
 

 
–  3.0
+  7.5
 

 
+  0.1
+10.7
 
 


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x512608







 




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pre-Election CBS +Gallup +ABC +FOX +Pew Affirm Post-Election PRELIM Exit Poll (not 'forced' Final)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like there isn't anyone buying
the crap that TIA is selling these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Every election since mid and late-1960's is in question . . .
that's when the computers came in --

And, yes, I'm sure that Obama probably had a much bigger win.

Remember, the large computers used by MSM came in first . . .

questionable crashes and then "new" results.

Evidently, many anchors, journalists came to understand what

was going on and how the computers were being used -- many left.

So even back that far, we have a corporate-media complicit in

aiding election steals.

I'd say the Nixon/Humphrey election rates suspicion.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC