|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:04 PM Original message |
About William Black's claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. No comment? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Reading through some of the comments it does not look as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yep. Too much emphasis on the Bank Holding Company.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Because they are BHC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. BHCs are not immune from Federal action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Correction - Black was correct on all points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Precismo - correct on all points. No lie, no misstatement, not even misdirection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. What are you arguing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Appears that way, a few direct links to comments... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It's clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I'm not clear on all of the laws, so I'm not as willing to accept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Note that the "Appropriate Federal Banking Agency" for AIG is the Office of Thrift Supervision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Thanks for that piece of info, we need an investigation - S. Res. 62 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. ""Pot calling the kettle black - you are half wrong" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. But if he made a mistake that NEGATES all he said because Obama is "golden?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. "BHC's are regulated and governed by the Federal Reserve," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. You are not addressing the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Same issue for me, who should have regulated the BHC and what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. And yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Wow, et tu ProSense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thank you for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. there you go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Except that there are various comments in that diary which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. 1. so they're "Too Big To Follow Law" 2. What part of OR don't you understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. Where's the substance in this post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Ah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Can you actually make a substantial argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. That's a declaration, not a reasoned argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. Please Go Back to GD: P Where This Bullshit Is Welcomed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. What: Facts? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Party FIRST seemingly is the point of your thread because it conveys no new information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Oh BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 08:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Just Stop It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Show me exactly where the law specifically mandates takeover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. You're Just Too Damn Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. Be sure to read the update |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
37. Thank You for The Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
39. Wrong, because the banks owned by the BHCs are subject to the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
43. Just out of curiosity, when did William Black become an "enemy of the people"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. No one said William Black is an enemy of the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. There are no charges that the Obama Admin is corrupt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-05-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. There are charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC