Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michelle Obama's conquest of Europe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:37 PM
Original message
Michelle Obama's conquest of Europe
As the president seeks to rebuild ties, the first lady is unveiling her own foreign engagement, blending a high-wattage celebrity with a message of self-reliance and personal possibility.

By Christi Parsons
April 5, 2009
Reporting from Strasbourg, France -- So far on her trip to Europe, Michelle Obama has hugged the queen of England, double cheek-kissed the glamorous first lady of France and electrified the celebrity-obsessed tabloids.

When she talked to students at a school for underprivileged girls in London, though, her message was about her working-class childhood and her success gained through strong values and hard work in school.

In other words, she may be wearing Jimmy Choo kitten heels these days, but the first lady pulled herself up by an old-fashioned pair of American bootstraps.

In President Obama's first official visit overseas, he is preaching a new foreign policy, calling on Europeans to set aside negative feelings toward the U.S. in favor of an era of friendship and cooperation.

And Michelle Obama is unveiling her own policy of foreign engagement, one that blends a high-wattage celebrity with a message about self-reliance and personal possibility -- a story of special resonance on a continent where no minorities have risen to such prominence.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-michelle-obama5-2009apr05,0,6697503.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. A big old KKKKK&RRRRRR! (nt)
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. why does every article/thread/post about M.O
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 11:45 PM by Djinn
have to refer to what she's wearing or whether or not she's aesthetically pleasing?

The fashion press pronounced her every bit the equal of Bruni, with whom she seemed to have formed a friendship during the NATO summit here

Who gives a crap if some over paid writer who spends their time around dresses that cost more than my flat think she's the "equal" of Bruni or not?

I can't believe a woman of her talents is being steadily reduced to a charming, pretty clothes horse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you old enough to remember Jackie Kennedy?
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 12:05 AM by pacalo
For me, Michelle Obama brings back those memories of Jackie's style, beauty, class, & grace. I was only 9 years old when John & Jackie Kennedy moved into the White House, but I was quite impressed even at that age.

I don't begrudge the cost of a first lady's clothes, but I do like to see them choose their clothes well, which Michelle definitely does.

We have a local newswoman you would love (as I do). For about 10 years now, she has worn an outfit every Monday that she purchased at the local Goodwill Store & she'll take a moment to urge women viewers to shop there, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. why do you care what they wear?
it's not a cost issue for me, if she deliberately only wore the same ratty old tracksuit she bought 20 years ago I'd still view it as irrelevant.

Why are people still so impressed/unimpressed by what a woman looks like in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omnibus Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Part sexist, part cultural.
Part of the issue is that women have a broader range of ACCEPTABLE outfits in formal situations in our culture. Part of it is that there's a larger pressure for women to be "fashionable" in our society. I don't like the latter part, but it's true. The public pays more attention to female attention to fashion than it does for males, and so reports on female apparel more than males. Part of it is a sexist trivialization of women, too, and part of it is a trivialization of presidential spouses.

For the record, I don't like the lack of options for a male in formal occasions either, and would like to see that changed as well. I'd also like to see fashion considered irrelevant for political heads of state.

I can't wait until we DO get a "First Gentleman". How would Bill Clinton have dealt with that if Hillary would've won? It could help us realign how we report on the First Spouse, in a potentially hilarious and eye-opening way, and I can't wait to see it. Maybe 4 years of a First Gentleman will finally break the back of our obsession with outer appearance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. After 8 years of dresses that look like they are made from curtains,
it is a welcome change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC