ORDagnabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:33 PM
Original message |
anybody care to remember how long our government denied shipping arms on the Lusitania that got us |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 11:34 PM by ORDagnabbit
riled up to join world war 1? oh thats right they never admitted it.... it took researchers until dec 2008 to go down and find out we did. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1098904/Secret-Lusitania-Arms-challenges-Allied-claims-solely-passenger-ship.html
|
ORDagnabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Winston Churchill, who was first Lord of the Admiralty and has long been suspected of knowing more about the circumstances of the attack than he let on in public, wrote in a confidential letter shortly before the sinking that some German submarine attacks were to be welcomed.
He said: 'It is most important to attract neutral shipping to our shores, in the hope especially of embroiling the U.S. with Germany.
|
Whoa_Nelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yes, it was okay to forfeit citizens of many nationalities |
|
all for the good of war :sarcasm:
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. And the Germans took the bait, apparently |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 11:56 PM by Occam Bandage
unable to see as clearly as Churchill did that killing American citizens was likely to cause America to officially get off the fence. Sending the Zimmerman telegram, though, that was like double stupid, especially given American-Mexican relations...
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yep. Boy, it was stupid of Germany to do that. |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It took us two years after the Lusitania was sunk to get involved in the war. |
|
It was not the proximate cause.
|
Hobarticus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-04-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Shhhh.....inconvenient facts not welcome, thanks. |
|
Just sit back and watch history transform before your very eyes...
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-05-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just like when people blame the 2001 downturn on 9/11? |
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-05-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm no expert, but he had some massive failures in his WW1 role that cost the lives of lots of soldiers under his command.
He certainly learned well from his mistakes, but the thing I find fascinating about him is that he was quite comfortable sacrificing the lives of his troops if it meant a better position to win the War. I could not knowingly do that.
We all know from history all governments lie their asses off. It's interesting that we all seem to think the days of government lying are over, when so much evidence to the contrary is constantly thrown in our faces.
Which is why yet again I'm going to see my Congressman John Larsen this afternoon to nag him yet again about bringing the Bush White House to justice. I will not stand for my tax dollars supporting torture and kidnapping. And never holding the criminals to account insures that in the future the crimes will be repeated on an even greater scale than before.
The Nixon pardon led to Bush the stupider's crimes with many of the players from Nixon. And Iran-Contra. recycled criminals serving in government again is despicable.
And now we're enjoying the fruits of not prosecuting the S&L criminals of 20 years ago.
THE MESSAGE WE NEED TO BROADCAST IS THAT NO AMERICAN IS ABOVE THE LAW! Or that WE THE PEOPLE expect all criminals to be brought to justice.
-90% jimmy
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |