Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say there is a new constitutional convention and you are one of the delegates...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:05 PM
Original message
Say there is a new constitutional convention and you are one of the delegates...
what would you like to be in a new US Constitution?

Would you keep the current presidential system, go to a semi-presidential system like France (executive power is split between the president and prime minister), or a parliamentary system like Germany and the UK (the presidency is mostly ceremonial)?

Should Congress have one or two houses? How should each house be set up?

Should Congress be filled by Winner-Take-All as is now? By Winner-Take-All plus run-offs? Proportional Representation? a mixed system using both Winner-Take-All and PR like in Germany?

How should the SCOTUS be set up? Should justices be elected or appointed? Have set terms or have lifetime tenure?

What should the relationship between the federal government and the states be? what powers should only the states have? what powers should only the federal government have?

Should national referenda, initiatives, and recall elections be allowed? Should constitutional amendments be ratified by the state legislatures or by majority vote?

What should be in a new "Bill of Rights"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Extradition for war crimes
Would fix a lot of wrong thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. parliment
proportional rep

I'd do away with the states if I could-it's criminal that a person in one state has rights that another one in a second state doesn't

lifetime tenure for judges

one house

no recall elections-you saw what happened in California




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I love the constitution
but we still have kings. Acountibility is the key to keeping corruption down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty much keep it the way it is
only make all political appointments subject to approval by the opposition party in Congress. That one will avoid one party rule.

Recess appointments to be done only in time of national emergency, specified as attack on any or all of the 50 states by a foreign power, massive natural disaster, or financial or infrastructure meltdown. Make those appointments contingent on approval by the opposition party in Congress as soon as Congress returns. If Congress fails to address it, the post will be vacated in 30 days.

Add the ERA to the Bill of Rights. Make abrogation of any of the provisions of the Bill of Rights subject to charges.

Force the registration of all PACs favorable to a foreign power (such as AIPAC or PACs influenced by Saudi Arabia) as foreign agents and regulate them accordingly.

Amendment to cover the right to every citizen to his or her own body concerning matters of birth and death and self medication in the meantime. In other words, codify the protection of reproductive rights, the right to refuse end of life medical torture in favor of the right to as comfortable an exit as possible, and end the drug war.

Amendment to establish a national health insurance program with no opt outs for the very rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's not go there.
I just think it would end up in chaos with no-one able to agree on anything.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Remove the horrendous concept of "corporate personhood" from the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC