Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court reverse discrimination case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:42 PM
Original message
Supreme Court reverse discrimination case
Edited on Wed Apr-22-09 05:42 PM by FLAprogressive
"WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments this morning on a reverse discrimination complaint by a group of white New Haven firefighters who claim they were denied promotion because the city illegally rejected their top promotional examination scores when black colleagues scored relatively poorly on the same test.

*snip*

The Ricci case grows from a 2003 test administered by New Haven to screen candidates for promotion to the positions of fire lieutenants and captains. One hundred and eighteen people took the test; 56 passed. Nineteen of the top scorers were eligible for promotion to 15 open lieutenant and captain positions.

Of the 15 top scorers 14 were white and one was Hispanic. None of the 19 African-American firefighters who took the test qualified for promotion, the city said.

Interpreting the results, the city said that no minorities would have been eligible for lieutenant, and two Hispanics would have been eligible for captain. After a racially charged debate, the city threw out the test results because no blacks could be promoted. The city said the examination, designed by a private contractor, had a "disparate impact" on minorities and likely would have violated the 1964 Civil rights act."

http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-webpreview-race-discriminationapr22,0,2488602.story?track=rss

-------

this is interesting....doesn't seem fair to throw out test results simply based on race but it seems like there's a lot more to the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. What was the point in the test anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. to see whether candidates could qualify for a promotion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. has anyone except the judges et all seen the the test? it would be very interesting
to see if it was indeed scewed toward white culture? I mean a question like ...was lynching during the 1920's legal? the answer might be yes based on the times...but as a black person (which I am not) I would say EMPHATICALLY NO!..I know it is not that cut and dried, but I would love to see the test!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. maybe it is slanted toward what is required
of a fire fighter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well,if it got all the way to the supreme court..and judges et all have seen the test....maybe not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC