Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Hillary been mentioned as a potential SCOTUS nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:03 PM
Original message
Has Hillary been mentioned as a potential SCOTUS nominee
I always thought that she'd be on the short list for the first opening

I always thought that she'd BE the short list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd be fine with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. She said months ago she wasn't interested. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other people besides Hillary live on the planet Earth. Heck a lot of them are U.S. citizens! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary has found the perfect job for her as SOS.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 07:34 PM by Psychic Consortium
She has blossomed and has never looked more radiant
or happier. She will be one of the best SOSs in American
history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. It's a great job for a back room type of politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. It is the perfect job for her on many levels. Yes.
Obama was very smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I just heard that she is polling higher than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. He takes a lot of the heat while she can shine.
That was an attractive part of the job for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Obama was so smart for putting her in that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychic Consortium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Yes indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. You can fool some of the people most of the time......etc.
Unfortunately, I have not seen any examples of her meriting this type of rating. I have to chalk it up to nothing more than PR. When she actually brokers something that turns out positive I might change my opinion, but for now this is nothing but positive Clinton media PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Diplomacy takes time and she's only been on the job for a couple months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd go with that except . . .
We really need steadiness at State right now, and I think her leaving the post at this time would be damaging. There will be other slots to fill even during Obama's first term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, another person hoping to remove her from politics forever.
No judicial experience whatsoever but let's dump her in the court and get her out of our hair.

Of course, bye-bye all those helpful fundraisers.

Secretary of State keeping her too much in the public eye for you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. No, aquart--I have long thought of her for SCOTUS because I think she
Edited on Sun May-03-09 10:31 PM by tblue37
would be a powerful and effective voice for liberalism on the Court. Soemtimes we think of such things because we admrie her, not ebcause we want to get rid of her. I would hate to lose her as SoC, though, ebcuase she is prefect there, but a SCOTUS seat would not be a demotion for goodness' sakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Jeezus Krispy Kreme Christ.
Touchy Much? It's a Supreme Court Nomination, not a janitorial post in Siberia.

A little advice; the bug in your britches--- whatever it is, let it go.

Just a friendly suggestion. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. She'd make Scalia's head explode & Thomas would retire simply because he's afraid of her
2 more seats open on SCOTUS! I don't have a problem with that. :evilgrin:

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. What a vivid image. Those two would probably feel vital parts of themselves trying to crawl up...
... into their abdomens. I hadn't even thought of that bonus until you mentioned it. :evilgrin:

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why won't she just clone herself
then Barack could appoint her to every major post possible to make up for her not being president. Geesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think she has a job already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. I never thought she'd be considered, even in passing.
When was the last SC nominee with no experience? The '60s? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Or Harriet Myers? n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Perfect example, laughed off the stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. she's too new as SoS
I suspect that if there's a second term or late 1st if an opening comes up, you could hear that talk, especially since Obama has expressed interest in getting someone from congress in the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. how bout BILL? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That will never happen
He was disbarred because of his so called "perjury" over the blow job. Not going to argue over whether that should or should not have happened, but it did. And it doesn't make him a likely candidate for any judicial appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. the wing nuts would go insane if she was nominated, that makes me kinda like the idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. No, she's not done with politics
and she's doing a fine job at State. Besides, she's not interested in the job.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. No - and why would she be on a short list
She has no judicial experience and her legal career was mostly corporate law.

She also is SoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have long advocated for her on the SCOTUS. I would hate to lose her
as SoC, but she'd be great on the SCOTUS, and it's a lifetime appointment, so no one would be able to take it from her, either. She could have major influence for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. She would HATE that job..and would not take it, if offered..
She likes what she's doing now..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Yes she does. But the detail oriented worker-bee she is is oddly suited to the Supremes.
Some friends of mine that teach law say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. She's too old.
I think she is qualified, but this is a lifetime appointment and we should be hoping for someone younger who will be there for 20 or 25 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. I would prefer them to pick someone younger so that they can be on the court longer...
and she also said she's not interested.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. I think she's really working out well as SoS. I think she likes it, too.
I suspect it will be someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. Not her turn yet. She can have the next one so Susan Rice gets a turn at SoS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. The same Clinton who voted "yea" for the Homeland Security Bill?
No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. She's doing a great job as Secretary of State. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. She's just fine where she's at.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but no one has ever accused Hillary Clinton of being terribly good at being a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. She was twice on the list of one of the best 100 lawyers in the nation.
Edited on Mon May-04-09 02:59 PM by Beacool
Back when she was practicing law in Arkansas.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. That might have had more to do with who she was married to than her legal skill.
Really, she does not have a terribly good reputation as a practicing attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. Better question is why you think she's qualified in particular over others. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I guess they think qualifications don't matter. She is Hillary you know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Of course. Silly of me to think otherwise around this place. n/t
Edited on Mon May-04-09 04:22 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC